Lala Shakti Swarup Ray, Bo Zhou, Sungho Suh, P. Lukowicz
{"title":"A comprehensive evaluation of marker-based, markerless methods for loose garment scenarios in varying camera configurations","authors":"Lala Shakti Swarup Ray, Bo Zhou, Sungho Suh, P. Lukowicz","doi":"10.3389/fcomp.2024.1379925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In support of smart wearable researchers striving to select optimal ground truth methods for motion capture across a spectrum of loose garment types, we present an extended benchmark named DrapeMoCapBench (DMCB+). This augmented benchmark incorporates a more intricate limb-wise Motion Capture (MoCap) accuracy analysis, and enhanced drape calculation, and introduces a novel benchmarking tool that encompasses multicamera deep learning MoCap methods. DMCB+ is specifically designed to evaluate the performance of both optical marker-based and markerless MoCap techniques, taking into account the challenges posed by various loose garment types. While high-cost marker-based systems are acknowledged for their precision, they often require skin-tight markers on bony areas, which can be impractical with loose garments. On the other hand, markerless MoCap methods driven by computer vision models have evolved to be more cost-effective, utilizing smartphone cameras and exhibiting promising results. Utilizing real-world MoCap datasets, DMCB+ conducts 3D physics simulations with a comprehensive set of variables, including six drape levels, three motion intensities, and six body-gender combinations. The extended benchmark provides a nuanced analysis of advanced marker-based and markerless MoCap techniques, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses across distinct scenarios. In particular, DMCB+ reveals that when evaluating casual loose garments, both marker-based and markerless methods exhibit notable performance degradation (>10 cm). However, in scenarios involving everyday activities with basic and swift motions, markerless MoCap outperforms marker-based alternatives. This positions markerless MoCap as an advantageous and economical choice for wearable studies. The inclusion of a multicamera deep learning MoCap method in the benchmarking tool further expands the scope, allowing researchers to assess the capabilities of cutting-edge technologies in diverse motion capture scenarios.","PeriodicalId":52823,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Computer Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2024.1379925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In support of smart wearable researchers striving to select optimal ground truth methods for motion capture across a spectrum of loose garment types, we present an extended benchmark named DrapeMoCapBench (DMCB+). This augmented benchmark incorporates a more intricate limb-wise Motion Capture (MoCap) accuracy analysis, and enhanced drape calculation, and introduces a novel benchmarking tool that encompasses multicamera deep learning MoCap methods. DMCB+ is specifically designed to evaluate the performance of both optical marker-based and markerless MoCap techniques, taking into account the challenges posed by various loose garment types. While high-cost marker-based systems are acknowledged for their precision, they often require skin-tight markers on bony areas, which can be impractical with loose garments. On the other hand, markerless MoCap methods driven by computer vision models have evolved to be more cost-effective, utilizing smartphone cameras and exhibiting promising results. Utilizing real-world MoCap datasets, DMCB+ conducts 3D physics simulations with a comprehensive set of variables, including six drape levels, three motion intensities, and six body-gender combinations. The extended benchmark provides a nuanced analysis of advanced marker-based and markerless MoCap techniques, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses across distinct scenarios. In particular, DMCB+ reveals that when evaluating casual loose garments, both marker-based and markerless methods exhibit notable performance degradation (>10 cm). However, in scenarios involving everyday activities with basic and swift motions, markerless MoCap outperforms marker-based alternatives. This positions markerless MoCap as an advantageous and economical choice for wearable studies. The inclusion of a multicamera deep learning MoCap method in the benchmarking tool further expands the scope, allowing researchers to assess the capabilities of cutting-edge technologies in diverse motion capture scenarios.