Effects of a Novel Blended Virtual Reality and Clinical Learning Environment on the Learning Transfer of Anesthesiology Residents

Q3 Medicine Acta medica Iranica Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.18502/acta.v61i9.15285
S. Mousavi, Morteza Karami, S. Mireskandari, S. Samadi
{"title":"Effects of a Novel Blended Virtual Reality and Clinical Learning Environment on the Learning Transfer of Anesthesiology Residents","authors":"S. Mousavi, Morteza Karami, S. Mireskandari, S. Samadi","doi":"10.18502/acta.v61i9.15285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of educational technology is considered a necessity due to the increasing changes in medical education. This study aimed to design a novel blended virtual reality and clinical learning environment (CLE) and to investigate its effectiveness in the learning transfer of anesthesiology residents during spinal anesthesia procedures. In this experimental study, 25 residents (academic year 2020/2021) were randomly divided into blended (n=11) and clinical (n=14) groups. Spinal anesthesia training for the blended group was performed in the virtual training laboratory (week 1) and the operating room (from week 2 to week 4), while for the CLE group, it was only performed in the operating room. Training, based on task-centered learning, was provided for both groups, and then, a 360-degree assessment of learning transfer was conducted by professors, patients, co-workers, and self-assessments using a standard questionnaire. Data were analyzed using non-parametric tests. There was a significant difference in the learning transfer of residents between the blended and CLE groups (U=39, P=0.03<0.05). There was also a significant difference in the subcategories of learning transfer according to the professors and co-workers; however, there was no significant difference according to the patients and self-assessments. The blended VR/CLE learning environment was more effective than CLE in improving residents’ learning transfer. Besides, an increase in scores indicated an improvement in professional competence.","PeriodicalId":6946,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica Iranica","volume":"83 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica Iranica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/acta.v61i9.15285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of educational technology is considered a necessity due to the increasing changes in medical education. This study aimed to design a novel blended virtual reality and clinical learning environment (CLE) and to investigate its effectiveness in the learning transfer of anesthesiology residents during spinal anesthesia procedures. In this experimental study, 25 residents (academic year 2020/2021) were randomly divided into blended (n=11) and clinical (n=14) groups. Spinal anesthesia training for the blended group was performed in the virtual training laboratory (week 1) and the operating room (from week 2 to week 4), while for the CLE group, it was only performed in the operating room. Training, based on task-centered learning, was provided for both groups, and then, a 360-degree assessment of learning transfer was conducted by professors, patients, co-workers, and self-assessments using a standard questionnaire. Data were analyzed using non-parametric tests. There was a significant difference in the learning transfer of residents between the blended and CLE groups (U=39, P=0.03<0.05). There was also a significant difference in the subcategories of learning transfer according to the professors and co-workers; however, there was no significant difference according to the patients and self-assessments. The blended VR/CLE learning environment was more effective than CLE in improving residents’ learning transfer. Besides, an increase in scores indicated an improvement in professional competence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型混合虚拟现实和临床学习环境对麻醉学住院医生学习迁移的影响
随着医学教育的日益变革,教育技术的使用被认为是一种必然。本研究旨在设计一种新颖的混合虚拟现实和临床学习环境(CLE),并调查其对麻醉科住院医师在脊髓麻醉过程中学习转移的有效性。在这项实验研究中,25 名住院医师(2020/2021 学年)被随机分为混合组(11 人)和临床组(14 人)。混合组的脊柱麻醉培训在虚拟培训实验室(第1周)和手术室(第2周至第4周)进行,而 CLE 组仅在手术室进行。两组人员都接受了以任务为中心的学习培训,然后通过教授、患者、同事以及使用标准问卷进行的自我评估,对学习转移进行了 360 度评估。数据采用非参数检验进行分析。混合组和 CLE 组住院医师的学习迁移有明显差异(U=39,P=0.03<0.05)。根据教授和同事的评价,学习迁移的子类别也有显著差异;但根据患者和自我评价,没有显著差异。在提高住院医师的学习迁移方面,VR/CLE 混合学习环境比 CLE 更有效。此外,得分的增加也表明了专业能力的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta medica Iranica
Acta medica Iranica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: ACTA MEDICA IRANICA (p. ISSN 0044-6025; e. ISSN: 1735-9694) is the official journal of the Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The journal is the oldest scientific medical journal of the country, which has been published from 1960 onward in English language. Although it had been published quarterly in the past, the journal has been published bimonthly (6 issues per year) from the year 2004. Acta Medica Iranica it is an international journal with multidisciplinary scope which publishes original research papers, review articles, case reports, and letters to the editor from all over the world. The journal has a wide scope and allows scientists, clinicians, and academic members to publish their original works in this field.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Gestational Hypertension on Neonatal Hemoglobin Level A Review on Novel Methods of Pharmacology Teaching Concerning Iranian Academic Context Transcatheter Closure of a Huge Congenital Coronary-Cameral Fistula With Amplatzer Occluder Erythrocyte Antioxidants and Hexokinase Activity Alterations in CCl4-Induced Cirrhotic Rats Through Naltrexone Treatment Upright Versus Recumbent Position in the Second Stage of Labor for Women With Epidural Analgesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1