Local Financial Impact of the Paycheck Protection Program: County Level Determinants

Divyanshi Singhal
{"title":"Local Financial Impact of the Paycheck Protection Program: County Level Determinants","authors":"Divyanshi Singhal","doi":"10.18776/tcu/br/7/176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) was one of the key components of the government’s response to the economic fallout of COVID-19. Enacted on March 27, 2020, the program had ambitious goals that included keeping workers off the unemployment rolls, boosting consumer spending, and ensuring small business continuity during the shutdown. Nonetheless, empirical evidence on the success of PPP is mixed. In order to contribute to this literature, I examine the impact of PPP loans on unemployment and consumer spending at the county level. Congress amended the PPP in 2021 by passing the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and Venues Act (Economic Aid Act), which was intended to provide additional support to many small businesses. Since most of the existing studies are limited to 2020, I study PPP loans disbursed in both 2020 (pre-Economic Aid Act) and 2021 (post-Economic Aid Act). My study addresses the following three economic questions: i. Did the Paycheck Protection Program result in lower unemployment rates in participating counties? ii. Did the Paycheck Protection Program stimulate consumer spending in participating counties? iii. Was aid given in 2021 through the Economic Aid Act more effective than the initial 2020 Paycheck Protection Program? Through pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) and fixed effects regressions, I find that the counties that received PPP loans experienced a decrease in unemployment rates and an increase in consumer spending. Additionally, my analysis indicates increased effectiveness of the PPP loans in 2021 relative to 2020. Overall, my analysis indicates that the PPP achieved its objectives.\n","PeriodicalId":406644,"journal":{"name":"The Boller Review","volume":"35 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Boller Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18776/tcu/br/7/176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) was one of the key components of the government’s response to the economic fallout of COVID-19. Enacted on March 27, 2020, the program had ambitious goals that included keeping workers off the unemployment rolls, boosting consumer spending, and ensuring small business continuity during the shutdown. Nonetheless, empirical evidence on the success of PPP is mixed. In order to contribute to this literature, I examine the impact of PPP loans on unemployment and consumer spending at the county level. Congress amended the PPP in 2021 by passing the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and Venues Act (Economic Aid Act), which was intended to provide additional support to many small businesses. Since most of the existing studies are limited to 2020, I study PPP loans disbursed in both 2020 (pre-Economic Aid Act) and 2021 (post-Economic Aid Act). My study addresses the following three economic questions: i. Did the Paycheck Protection Program result in lower unemployment rates in participating counties? ii. Did the Paycheck Protection Program stimulate consumer spending in participating counties? iii. Was aid given in 2021 through the Economic Aid Act more effective than the initial 2020 Paycheck Protection Program? Through pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) and fixed effects regressions, I find that the counties that received PPP loans experienced a decrease in unemployment rates and an increase in consumer spending. Additionally, my analysis indicates increased effectiveness of the PPP loans in 2021 relative to 2020. Overall, my analysis indicates that the PPP achieved its objectives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
薪酬保护计划对地方财政的影响:县级决定因素
薪资保护计划 (PPP) 是政府应对 COVID-19 经济后果的关键措施之一。该计划于 2020 年 3 月 27 日颁布,其雄心勃勃的目标包括将工人从失业名单上除名、刺激消费支出以及确保小企业在停摆期间的连续性。然而,有关购买力平价成功与否的经验证据却不尽相同。为了对这一文献有所贡献,我研究了 PPP 贷款在县一级对失业和消费支出的影响。美国国会于 2021 年通过了《向遭受重创的小企业、非营利组织和场所提供经济援助法》(《经济援助法》),对 PPP 进行了修订,旨在为许多小企业提供额外支持。由于大多数现有研究仅限于 2020 年,因此我对 2020 年(《经济援助法案》通过前)和 2021 年(《经济援助法案》通过后)发放的 PPP 贷款进行了研究。我的研究涉及以下三个经济问题:i. "工资保护计划 "是否降低了参与县的失业率?工资保护计划是否刺激了参与县的消费支出?2021 年通过《经济援助法案》提供的援助是否比最初的 2020 年薪资保护计划更有效?通过集合普通最小二乘法(OLS)和固定效应回归,我发现获得 PPP 贷款的县的失业率有所下降,消费者支出有所增加。此外,我的分析表明,与 2020 年相比,购买力平价贷款在 2021 年的有效性有所提高。总体而言,我的分析表明,购买力平价实现了其目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Current and Emerging Applications of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Shadows in the Shape of Swan Lake Lizzy’s Royal Ice Cream Utilizing Digital Thermal Monitoring (DTM) to Measure Reactive Hyperemia of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus on Cardiovascular Endothelial Function An Examination of the Effectiveness of Ballet on Gross Motor Function in Children with Intellectual Developmental Disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1