{"title":"Après la pilule. Le choix contraceptif des jeunes femmes à l’épreuve du rejet des hormones","authors":"Cécile Thomé","doi":"10.3917/spub.241.0087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nAlthough the pill is still the contraceptive method most commonly used by young women in France, since the ‘00s there has been a decline in its use and a questioning of its centrality in the contraceptive norm. This questioning is part of a growing climate of mistrust toward hormonal methods.\n\n\nPURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH\nBased on an analysis of a corpus of twenty-one interviews with women aged between twenty and twenty-eight on the subject of contraceptive choice, this article aims to provide information on the ways in which rejection of hormones is expressed and to determine its concrete effects on the interviewees’ contraceptive choices.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe survey shows the prevalence of mistrust of hormones among the young women interviewed. This mistrust is rarely rooted in their contraceptive experience; with a few exceptions, it seems to be more diffuse. This mistrust is most often expressed by women when it comes to justifying stopping the pill, the logistical burden of which becomes increasingly heavy as the years go by. However, the vast majority of women who reject the use of hormones continue to use medical contraception, including hormonal contraception, as long as it is perceived to be easier to use than the pill.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nBy questioning hormonal contraception, and the pill in particular, young women are denouncing the lack of choice: they are not asking for less contraception, but for contraception that is better suited to their needs.","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.241.0087","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Although the pill is still the contraceptive method most commonly used by young women in France, since the ‘00s there has been a decline in its use and a questioning of its centrality in the contraceptive norm. This questioning is part of a growing climate of mistrust toward hormonal methods.
PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH
Based on an analysis of a corpus of twenty-one interviews with women aged between twenty and twenty-eight on the subject of contraceptive choice, this article aims to provide information on the ways in which rejection of hormones is expressed and to determine its concrete effects on the interviewees’ contraceptive choices.
RESULTS
The survey shows the prevalence of mistrust of hormones among the young women interviewed. This mistrust is rarely rooted in their contraceptive experience; with a few exceptions, it seems to be more diffuse. This mistrust is most often expressed by women when it comes to justifying stopping the pill, the logistical burden of which becomes increasingly heavy as the years go by. However, the vast majority of women who reject the use of hormones continue to use medical contraception, including hormonal contraception, as long as it is perceived to be easier to use than the pill.
CONCLUSIONS
By questioning hormonal contraception, and the pill in particular, young women are denouncing the lack of choice: they are not asking for less contraception, but for contraception that is better suited to their needs.
期刊介绍:
La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs,
professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie
des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions
de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de
soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale.
Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur
l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants
et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé,
organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques
de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation
et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille
sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents
secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique
d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources,
politiques de régulation et de financement, etc