Definition and application of the Péclet number threshold for water quality analysis in water distribution networks

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Hydroinformatics Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.2166/hydro.2024.102
Stefania Piazza, Mariacrocetta Sambito, Gabriele Freni
{"title":"Definition and application of the Péclet number threshold for water quality analysis in water distribution networks","authors":"Stefania Piazza, Mariacrocetta Sambito, Gabriele Freni","doi":"10.2166/hydro.2024.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n To assess the water quality within the distribution networks, simplified models are used, which adopt an advective–reactive approach and neglect diffusion–dispersion phenomena. Although such simplifications can be sufficiently accurate in complete turbulent uniform flow regimes, literature works demonstrated that they could produce wrong results in laminar and transitional regimes that are relevant when analysing low flows, dead-end pipes in looped distribution networks or service connections. On the other hand, advective simplification allows for considerable computational savings during the simulation of large networks. Therefore, a criterion is needed for better discriminate pipes in which the advective approach is sufficient or the diffusive approach is required. The present study aims to investigate the use of the Péclet number to discriminate the use of advective simplification both adopting the two-dimensional (2D) advection–dispersion equation and the one-dimensional (1D) cross-section averaged advection–dispersion equation. The numerical analysis was applied to a linear pipeline using the EPANET, 1D advective–dispersive–reactive, and EPANET-DD (Dynamic–Dispersion) models. The results showed the inadequacy of the Péclet number in discriminating the dominance of the advective–dispersive process in real systems, as it is linked to the pipe's length, regardless of the flow regime occurring on the pipeline.","PeriodicalId":54801,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydroinformatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydroinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2024.102","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To assess the water quality within the distribution networks, simplified models are used, which adopt an advective–reactive approach and neglect diffusion–dispersion phenomena. Although such simplifications can be sufficiently accurate in complete turbulent uniform flow regimes, literature works demonstrated that they could produce wrong results in laminar and transitional regimes that are relevant when analysing low flows, dead-end pipes in looped distribution networks or service connections. On the other hand, advective simplification allows for considerable computational savings during the simulation of large networks. Therefore, a criterion is needed for better discriminate pipes in which the advective approach is sufficient or the diffusive approach is required. The present study aims to investigate the use of the Péclet number to discriminate the use of advective simplification both adopting the two-dimensional (2D) advection–dispersion equation and the one-dimensional (1D) cross-section averaged advection–dispersion equation. The numerical analysis was applied to a linear pipeline using the EPANET, 1D advective–dispersive–reactive, and EPANET-DD (Dynamic–Dispersion) models. The results showed the inadequacy of the Péclet number in discriminating the dominance of the advective–dispersive process in real systems, as it is linked to the pipe's length, regardless of the flow regime occurring on the pipeline.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
输水管网水质分析中佩克莱特数阈值的定义和应用
为了评估配水管网中的水质,我们使用了简化模型,这些模型采用了平流-反应方法,忽略了扩散-弥散现象。虽然这种简化方法在完全湍动的均匀流状态下具有足够的准确性,但文献研究表明,在层流和过渡状态下可能会产生错误的结果,而在分析低流量、环状配水管网中的死角管道或服务连接时,层流和过渡状态是非常重要的。另一方面,平动简化可在大型网络模拟中节省大量计算量。因此,需要一个标准来更好地区分哪些管道采用平动方法就足够了,哪些管道需要采用扩散方法。本研究旨在探讨如何使用佩克莱特数来区分采用二维(2D)平流-扩散方程和一维(1D)横截面平均平流-扩散方程的平流简化。使用 EPANET、一维平流-分散-反应模型和 EPANET-DD(动态-分散)模型对线性管道进行了数值分析。结果表明,在实际系统中,佩克莱特数不足以区分平流-分散过程的主导地位,因为它与管道的长度有关,与管道上发生的流态无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydroinformatics
Journal of Hydroinformatics 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
59
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Hydroinformatics is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the application of information technology in the widest sense to problems of the aquatic environment. It promotes Hydroinformatics as a cross-disciplinary field of study, combining technological, human-sociological and more general environmental interests, including an ethical perspective.
期刊最新文献
Sensitivity of model-based leakage localisation in water distribution networks to water demand sampling rates and spatio-temporal data gaps Efficient functioning of a sewer system: application of novel hybrid machine learning methods for the prediction of particle Froude number Quantile mapping technique for enhancing satellite-derived precipitation data in hydrological modelling: a case study of the Lam River Basin, Vietnam Development and application of a hybrid artificial neural network model for simulating future stream flows in catchments with limited in situ observed data Formation of meandering streams in a young floodplain within the Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon in the Tibetan Plateau
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1