Improved cardiac auscultation competency interweaving visual, auditory, and tactile stimuli: a preliminary study.

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES International Journal of Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.5116/ijme.6607.27a6
Harrison A. Patrizio, Riley Phyu, Bum Kim, Nils V Brolis
{"title":"Improved cardiac auscultation competency interweaving visual, auditory, and tactile stimuli: a preliminary study.","authors":"Harrison A. Patrizio, Riley Phyu, Bum Kim, Nils V Brolis","doi":"10.5116/ijme.6607.27a6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Methods\n  A pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted at our institution's simulation center with 32 first year medical students from a single medical institution. Participants were randomly divided into two equal groups and completed an educational module the identification and pathophysiology of five common cardiac sounds. The control group utilized traditional education methods, while the interventional group incorporated multisensory stimuli. Afterwards, participants listened to randomly selected cardiac sounds and competency data was collected through a multiple-choice post-assessment in both groups. Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the data.\n\n\nResults\nData were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher in the multisensory group (Mdn=100%) compared to the control group (Mdn=60%) on the post-assessment (U=73.5, p<0.042). Likewise, knowledge acquisition was substantially better in the multisensory group (Mdn=80%) than in the control group (Mdn=50%) (U= 49, p<0.031).\n\n\nConclusions\nThese findings suggest the incorporation of multisensory stimuli significantly improves cardiac auscultation competency. Given its cost-effectiveness and simplicity, this approach offers a viable alternative to more expensive simulation technologies like the Harvey simulator, particularly in settings with limited resources. Consequently, this teaching modality holds promise for global applicability, addressing the worldwide deterioration in cardiac auscultation skills and potentially leading to better patient outcomes. Future studies should broaden the sample size, span multiple institutions, and investigate long-term retention rates.","PeriodicalId":14029,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.6607.27a6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Methods   A pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted at our institution's simulation center with 32 first year medical students from a single medical institution. Participants were randomly divided into two equal groups and completed an educational module the identification and pathophysiology of five common cardiac sounds. The control group utilized traditional education methods, while the interventional group incorporated multisensory stimuli. Afterwards, participants listened to randomly selected cardiac sounds and competency data was collected through a multiple-choice post-assessment in both groups. Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the data. Results Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher in the multisensory group (Mdn=100%) compared to the control group (Mdn=60%) on the post-assessment (U=73.5, p<0.042). Likewise, knowledge acquisition was substantially better in the multisensory group (Mdn=80%) than in the control group (Mdn=50%) (U= 49, p<0.031). Conclusions These findings suggest the incorporation of multisensory stimuli significantly improves cardiac auscultation competency. Given its cost-effectiveness and simplicity, this approach offers a viable alternative to more expensive simulation technologies like the Harvey simulator, particularly in settings with limited resources. Consequently, this teaching modality holds promise for global applicability, addressing the worldwide deterioration in cardiac auscultation skills and potentially leading to better patient outcomes. Future studies should broaden the sample size, span multiple institutions, and investigate long-term retention rates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将视觉、听觉和触觉刺激交织在一起提高心脏听诊能力:一项初步研究。
方法 在本机构的模拟中心对来自一家医疗机构的 32 名一年级医学生进行了随机对照试验。参与者被随机分为两个相同的小组,并完成一个关于五种常见心音的识别和病理生理学的教育模块。对照组采用传统的教育方法,而干预组则加入了多感官刺激。之后,参与者聆听随机选择的心音,并通过多项选择后评估收集两组的能力数据。数据采用曼-惠特尼 U 检验进行分析。在后评估中,多感官组的诊断准确率(Mdn=100%)明显高于对照组(Mdn=60%)(U=73.5,P<0.042)。同样,多感官组的知识掌握程度(Mdn=80%)也大大高于对照组(Mdn=50%)(U=49,p<0.031)。鉴于其成本效益和简便性,这种方法可替代哈维模拟器等更昂贵的模拟技术,特别是在资源有限的情况下。因此,这种教学模式有望在全球范围内推广,解决全球范围内心脏听诊技能下降的问题,并有可能为患者带来更好的治疗效果。未来的研究应扩大样本量,跨越多个机构,并调查长期保留率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Education
International Journal of Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Exploring a metacognitive approach for case analysis based learning of anxiety adjustment in nurses: a qualitative study. Current trends and obstacles in off-the-job nursing ethics training in Japanese hospitals: a cross-sectional study. Ensuring fairness in assessment in health professions education: rapid analysis tools to detect differential item functioning across groups. Factors influencing intercultural competences of hospital workers for multicultural patients in South Korea. Workforce nurturing: an approach to improving wellbeing, burnout and professional fulfilment among Australian doctors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1