Rehabilitation delivery models to foster healthy ageing—a scoping review

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2024.1307536
Vanessa Seijas, Roxanne Maritz, Patricia Fernandes, Renaldo M. Bernard, Luz Helena Lugo, J. Bickenbach, C. Sabariego
{"title":"Rehabilitation delivery models to foster healthy ageing—a scoping review","authors":"Vanessa Seijas, Roxanne Maritz, Patricia Fernandes, Renaldo M. Bernard, Luz Helena Lugo, J. Bickenbach, C. Sabariego","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2024.1307536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Rehabilitation is essential to foster healthy ageing. Older adults have unique rehabilitation needs due to a higher prevalence of non-communicable diseases, higher susceptibility to infectious diseases, injuries, and mental health conditions. However, there is limited understanding of how rehabilitation is delivered to older adults. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review to describe rehabilitation delivery models used to optimise older adults' functioning/functional ability and foster healthy ageing. Methods We searched Medline and Embase (January 2015 to May 2022) for primary studies published in English describing approaches to provide rehabilitation to older adults. Three authors screened records for eligibility and extracted data independently and in duplicate. Data synthesis included descriptive quantitative analysis of study and rehabilitation provision characteristics, and qualitative analysis to identify rehabilitation delivery models. Results Out of 6,933 identified records, 585 articles were assessed for eligibility, and 283 studies with 69,257 participants were included. We identified six rehabilitation delivery models: outpatient (24%), telerehabilitation (22%), home (18.5%), community (16.3%), inpatient (14.6%), and eldercare (4.7%). These models often involved multidisciplinary teams (31.5%) and follow integrated care principles (30.4%). Most studies used a disease-centred approach (59.0%), while studies addressing multimorbidity (6.0%) and prevalent health problems of older adults, such as pain, low hearing, and vision, or incontinence were scarce. The most frequently provided interventions were therapeutic exercises (54.1%), self-management education (40.1%), and assessment of person-centred goals (40%). Other interventions, such as assistive technology (8.1%) and environmental adaptations (7.4%) were infrequent. Conclusions Focusing on primary studies, this scoping review provides an overview of rehabilitation delivery models that are used to foster healthy ageing and highlights research gaps that require further attention, including a lack of systematic assessment of functioning/functional ability, a predominance of disease-centred rehabilitation, and a scarcity of programmes addressing prevalent issues like pain, hearing/vision loss, fall prevention, incontinence, and sexual dysfunctions. Our research can facilitate evidence-based decision-making and inspire further research and innovation in rehabilitation and healthy ageing. Limitations of our study include reliance on published research to infer practice and not assessing model effectiveness. Future research in the field is needed to expand and validate our findings.","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1307536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Rehabilitation is essential to foster healthy ageing. Older adults have unique rehabilitation needs due to a higher prevalence of non-communicable diseases, higher susceptibility to infectious diseases, injuries, and mental health conditions. However, there is limited understanding of how rehabilitation is delivered to older adults. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review to describe rehabilitation delivery models used to optimise older adults' functioning/functional ability and foster healthy ageing. Methods We searched Medline and Embase (January 2015 to May 2022) for primary studies published in English describing approaches to provide rehabilitation to older adults. Three authors screened records for eligibility and extracted data independently and in duplicate. Data synthesis included descriptive quantitative analysis of study and rehabilitation provision characteristics, and qualitative analysis to identify rehabilitation delivery models. Results Out of 6,933 identified records, 585 articles were assessed for eligibility, and 283 studies with 69,257 participants were included. We identified six rehabilitation delivery models: outpatient (24%), telerehabilitation (22%), home (18.5%), community (16.3%), inpatient (14.6%), and eldercare (4.7%). These models often involved multidisciplinary teams (31.5%) and follow integrated care principles (30.4%). Most studies used a disease-centred approach (59.0%), while studies addressing multimorbidity (6.0%) and prevalent health problems of older adults, such as pain, low hearing, and vision, or incontinence were scarce. The most frequently provided interventions were therapeutic exercises (54.1%), self-management education (40.1%), and assessment of person-centred goals (40%). Other interventions, such as assistive technology (8.1%) and environmental adaptations (7.4%) were infrequent. Conclusions Focusing on primary studies, this scoping review provides an overview of rehabilitation delivery models that are used to foster healthy ageing and highlights research gaps that require further attention, including a lack of systematic assessment of functioning/functional ability, a predominance of disease-centred rehabilitation, and a scarcity of programmes addressing prevalent issues like pain, hearing/vision loss, fall prevention, incontinence, and sexual dysfunctions. Our research can facilitate evidence-based decision-making and inspire further research and innovation in rehabilitation and healthy ageing. Limitations of our study include reliance on published research to infer practice and not assessing model effectiveness. Future research in the field is needed to expand and validate our findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进健康老龄化的康复服务模式--范围界定审查
导言:康复对于促进健康老龄化至关重要。由于老年人非传染性疾病的发病率较高,对传染病、伤害和精神健康状况的易感性较高,因此他们对康复有着独特的需求。然而,人们对如何为老年人提供康复服务的了解十分有限。为了弥补这一不足,我们进行了一次范围界定综述,以描述用于优化老年人功能/功能能力和促进健康老龄化的康复服务模式。方法 我们检索了 Medline 和 Embase(2015 年 1 月至 2022 年 5 月)上发表的描述为老年人提供康复服务的方法的主要英文研究。三位作者筛选了符合条件的记录,并独立提取了一式两份的数据。数据综合包括对研究和康复服务特征的描述性定量分析,以及确定康复服务模式的定性分析。结果 在 6,933 条鉴定记录中,有 585 篇文章通过了资格评估,283 项研究和 69,257 名参与者被纳入其中。我们确定了六种康复服务模式:门诊(24%)、远程康复(22%)、家庭(18.5%)、社区(16.3%)、住院(14.6%)和老年护理(4.7%)。这些模式通常涉及多学科团队(31.5%)并遵循综合护理原则(30.4%)。大多数研究采用以疾病为中心的方法(59.0%),而针对多病(6.0%)和老年人普遍存在的健康问题(如疼痛、听力和视力低下或大小便失禁)的研究则很少。最常见的干预措施是治疗性锻炼(54.1%)、自我管理教育(40.1%)和以人为本的目标评估(40%)。其他干预措施,如辅助技术(8.1%)和环境改造(7.4%)并不常见。结论 本范围界定综述以主要研究为重点,概述了用于促进健康老龄化的康复服务模式,并强调了需要进一步关注的研究空白,包括缺乏对功能/作用能力的系统评估,以疾病为中心的康复服务占主导地位,以及缺乏解决疼痛、听力/视力丧失、预防跌倒、大小便失禁和性功能障碍等普遍问题的计划。我们的研究可以促进以证据为基础的决策,并激励在康复和健康老龄化方面的进一步研究和创新。我们的研究存在局限性,包括依赖已发表的研究来推断实践,以及未对模型的有效性进行评估。未来需要在该领域开展研究,以扩展和验证我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A survey of the experiences of delivering physiotherapy services through telerehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Responses of several measures to different intensity levels of upper limb exergames in children with neurological diagnoses: a pilot study. Counting the costs: understanding the extra costs of living with disability in Indonesia to advance inclusive policies within the SDG framework. Exploring knowledge, perception, and use of surface electromyography in physiotherapy post graduate trainees in Italy: a single center preliminary survey. Distinguishing pain profiles among individuals with long COVID.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1