Metaphors for multiculturalism in the Canadian context

Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.1075/msw.00045.sha
Kayvan Shakoury, Frank Boers
{"title":"Metaphors for multiculturalism in the Canadian context","authors":"Kayvan Shakoury, Frank Boers","doi":"10.1075/msw.00045.sha","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Although Canada is reputed for being a multicultural society, Canadians’ opinions vary regarding the extent to\n which multiculturalism should be promoted. Examining metaphorical language in discourse about multiculturalism may reveal which\n metaphors are typically used to endorse it and which ones are typically used to express a more skeptical stance. This study\n analyzed 646 opinion pieces regarding multiculturalism published in Canadian newspapers. Linguistic metaphors were identified and\n then grouped under themes. The texts were categorized according to the authors’ stance, and instantiations of the metaphor themes\n were tallied to determine if some occur more frequently in discourse that promotes multiculturalism compared to discourse that\n expresses reservations. Some metaphor themes were instantiated more often either in texts painting a positive picture of\n multicultural society (e.g., a multicultural society is a varied, multi-component work of art or craft) or in ones\n expressing reservations (e.g., multiculturalism is a destabilizing or divisive force). Such contrasts were nonetheless\n attenuated by the way a single metaphor theme can be used to serve different rhetorical purposes. It also appears that writers are\n not always aware of the entailments of the metaphors they use, especially if these are conventionalized phrases.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00045.sha","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although Canada is reputed for being a multicultural society, Canadians’ opinions vary regarding the extent to which multiculturalism should be promoted. Examining metaphorical language in discourse about multiculturalism may reveal which metaphors are typically used to endorse it and which ones are typically used to express a more skeptical stance. This study analyzed 646 opinion pieces regarding multiculturalism published in Canadian newspapers. Linguistic metaphors were identified and then grouped under themes. The texts were categorized according to the authors’ stance, and instantiations of the metaphor themes were tallied to determine if some occur more frequently in discourse that promotes multiculturalism compared to discourse that expresses reservations. Some metaphor themes were instantiated more often either in texts painting a positive picture of multicultural society (e.g., a multicultural society is a varied, multi-component work of art or craft) or in ones expressing reservations (e.g., multiculturalism is a destabilizing or divisive force). Such contrasts were nonetheless attenuated by the way a single metaphor theme can be used to serve different rhetorical purposes. It also appears that writers are not always aware of the entailments of the metaphors they use, especially if these are conventionalized phrases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
加拿大多元文化的隐喻
尽管加拿大以多元文化社会著称,但加拿大人对多元文化主义应在多大程度上得到推广却持有不同的观点。研究多元文化话语中的隐喻性语言,可以揭示哪些隐喻通常被用来支持多元文化,哪些隐喻通常被用来表达更加怀疑的立场。本研究分析了加拿大报纸上发表的 646 篇有关多元文化主义的评论文章。确定了语言隐喻,然后按主题进行分组。根据作者的立场对文章进行分类,并对隐喻主题的实例进行统计,以确定与表达保留意见的文章相比,是否有些隐喻主题在弘扬多元文化的文章中出现的频率更高。有些隐喻主题在描绘多元文化社会积极面貌的文章(例如,多元文化社会是一个多样化、多成分的艺术品或工艺品)或表达保留意见的文章(例如,多元文化主义是一种不稳定或分裂的力量)中出现的频率更高。然而,由于一个隐喻主题可以用于不同的修辞目的,这种对比被削弱了。此外,作者似乎并不总能意识到他们所使用的隐喻的内涵,尤其是当这些隐喻是常规化的短语时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1