Comparison of Hemodynamic Effects of Dose Response vs. Conventional Dosing of Propofol for Anesthesia Induction Under Bispectral Index Monitoring: A Clinical Trial

Q3 Medicine Acta medica Iranica Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.18502/acta.v61i9.15287
Zahra Khazaeipour, Niloufar Khoshnam-Rad, Khalil Pestei, S. Samadi
{"title":"Comparison of Hemodynamic Effects of Dose Response vs. Conventional Dosing of Propofol for Anesthesia Induction Under Bispectral Index Monitoring: A Clinical Trial","authors":"Zahra Khazaeipour, Niloufar Khoshnam-Rad, Khalil Pestei, S. Samadi","doi":"10.18502/acta.v61i9.15287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Propofol is an advantageous agent for anesthesia induction. It can cause dose-related hemodynamic adverse effects. The bispectral index (BIS) is a brain function monitor utilized to assess the depth of anesthesia. This study aimed to compare the adverse hemodynamic effects of BIS-guided response dosing with conventional weight-based dosing of Propofol. In this clinical trial, patients were anesthetized with propofol in two different orthopedic operating rooms. In one operating room, patients received propofol with dose-response method (group A), and the other received weight-based dosing (group B). For both groups, BIS was used as an index of anesthesia depth. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded at baseline, during induction, and at different time points. A total of 73 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean dose of propofol for induction was higher in the control group than in the response-guided group (1.94±1.65 vs. 1.09±0.32, respectively, P=0.006). There were no reported significant adverse hemodynamic effects in patients of the two groups. Response-guided propofol dosing can be used to decrease propofol dose during anesthesia induction. Further studies are needed to investigate the clinical benefit of this dosing strategy.","PeriodicalId":6946,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica Iranica","volume":"43 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica Iranica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/acta.v61i9.15287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Propofol is an advantageous agent for anesthesia induction. It can cause dose-related hemodynamic adverse effects. The bispectral index (BIS) is a brain function monitor utilized to assess the depth of anesthesia. This study aimed to compare the adverse hemodynamic effects of BIS-guided response dosing with conventional weight-based dosing of Propofol. In this clinical trial, patients were anesthetized with propofol in two different orthopedic operating rooms. In one operating room, patients received propofol with dose-response method (group A), and the other received weight-based dosing (group B). For both groups, BIS was used as an index of anesthesia depth. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded at baseline, during induction, and at different time points. A total of 73 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean dose of propofol for induction was higher in the control group than in the response-guided group (1.94±1.65 vs. 1.09±0.32, respectively, P=0.006). There were no reported significant adverse hemodynamic effects in patients of the two groups. Response-guided propofol dosing can be used to decrease propofol dose during anesthesia induction. Further studies are needed to investigate the clinical benefit of this dosing strategy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在双谱指数监测下比较剂量反应与常规剂量的异丙酚对麻醉诱导的血流动力学影响:临床试验
丙泊酚是一种用于麻醉诱导的优势药物。它可导致与剂量相关的血液动力学不良反应。双谱指数(BIS)是一种用于评估麻醉深度的脑功能监测器。本研究旨在比较 BIS 引导的反应剂量与传统的基于体重的异丙酚剂量对血液动力学的不良影响。在这项临床试验中,患者在两个不同的骨科手术室中接受异丙酚麻醉。在一间手术室中,患者使用剂量反应法使用异丙酚(A 组),而在另一间手术室中,患者使用基于体重的剂量法使用异丙酚(B 组)。两组均使用 BIS 作为麻醉深度指标。在基线、诱导期间和不同时间点记录血液动力学参数。共有 73 名患者被纳入最终分析。对照组的异丙酚平均诱导剂量高于反应引导组(分别为 1.94±1.65 对 1.09±0.32,P=0.006)。两组患者均未出现明显的血流动力学不良反应。反应引导的异丙酚剂量可用于减少麻醉诱导过程中的异丙酚剂量。还需要进一步研究这种剂量策略的临床益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta medica Iranica
Acta medica Iranica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: ACTA MEDICA IRANICA (p. ISSN 0044-6025; e. ISSN: 1735-9694) is the official journal of the Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The journal is the oldest scientific medical journal of the country, which has been published from 1960 onward in English language. Although it had been published quarterly in the past, the journal has been published bimonthly (6 issues per year) from the year 2004. Acta Medica Iranica it is an international journal with multidisciplinary scope which publishes original research papers, review articles, case reports, and letters to the editor from all over the world. The journal has a wide scope and allows scientists, clinicians, and academic members to publish their original works in this field.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Gestational Hypertension on Neonatal Hemoglobin Level A Review on Novel Methods of Pharmacology Teaching Concerning Iranian Academic Context Transcatheter Closure of a Huge Congenital Coronary-Cameral Fistula With Amplatzer Occluder Erythrocyte Antioxidants and Hexokinase Activity Alterations in CCl4-Induced Cirrhotic Rats Through Naltrexone Treatment Upright Versus Recumbent Position in the Second Stage of Labor for Women With Epidural Analgesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1