Understanding providers' perspectives using patient-reported outcomes in a pain management setting: a pilot study.

IF 1.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pain management Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.2217/pmt-2023-0084
Lisa R. Witkin, Abha Kasubhai, Silis Y Jiang, Ruth Gotian
{"title":"Understanding providers' perspectives using patient-reported outcomes in a pain management setting: a pilot study.","authors":"Lisa R. Witkin, Abha Kasubhai, Silis Y Jiang, Ruth Gotian","doi":"10.2217/pmt-2023-0084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This pilot study evaluated an electronic patient-reported outcomes collection system in pain management to understand providers' experiences using the data, and how it affects their patient interaction and guides their clinical decision-making. Materials & methods: Using stratified convenience sampling, nine semi-structured interviews were conducted with consented pain physicians. The transcribed, de-identified interviews were coded and analyzed. Results: Although most physicians utilized patient reported outcomes (PROs), one-third reported no significant change in their practice since implementation and 56% stated it does not influence their treatment recommendations. Conclusion: Despite the importance of measuring the impact of chronic pain on quality of life, there are significant limitations to the real-world use of PRO that may limit the patient's assessment and care.","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/pmt-2023-0084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This pilot study evaluated an electronic patient-reported outcomes collection system in pain management to understand providers' experiences using the data, and how it affects their patient interaction and guides their clinical decision-making. Materials & methods: Using stratified convenience sampling, nine semi-structured interviews were conducted with consented pain physicians. The transcribed, de-identified interviews were coded and analyzed. Results: Although most physicians utilized patient reported outcomes (PROs), one-third reported no significant change in their practice since implementation and 56% stated it does not influence their treatment recommendations. Conclusion: Despite the importance of measuring the impact of chronic pain on quality of life, there are significant limitations to the real-world use of PRO that may limit the patient's assessment and care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用疼痛管理环境中的患者报告结果了解服务提供者的观点:一项试点研究。
目的:这项试点研究评估了疼痛管理中的患者报告结果电子收集系统,以了解医疗服务提供者使用这些数据的经验,以及这些数据如何影响他们与患者的互动和指导他们的临床决策。材料与方法:采用分层方便抽样法,对获得同意的疼痛科医生进行了九次半结构化访谈。对转录、去标识的访谈进行了编码和分析。结果:虽然大多数医生都使用了患者报告结果 (PROs),但三分之一的医生表示,自实施以来,他们的做法没有发生重大变化,56% 的医生表示,PROs 不会影响他们的治疗建议。结论:尽管测量慢性疼痛对生活质量的影响非常重要,但在现实世界中使用患者报告结果存在很大的局限性,可能会限制对患者的评估和护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain management
Pain management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
62
期刊最新文献
A plain language summary describing changes in pain associated with uterine fibroids among women receiving relugolix combination therapy. Combatting opioid misuse, overuse and abuse: a systematic review of pharmacists' services and outcomes. Sustained relief with spinal cord stimulator despite anterior lead migration: a case report. "Trying to explain the unexplainable": why research on contextual factors in musculoskeletal pain is needed. PPARγ and AKt gene modulation following pregabalin and duloxetine combination for painful diabetic polyneuropathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1