Immersion in a relaxing virtual reality environment is associated with similar effects on stress and anxiety as heart rate variability biofeedback

IF 3.2 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Frontiers in virtual reality Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.3389/frvir.2024.1358981
Yvan Pratviel, P. Bouny, V. Deschodt-Arsac
{"title":"Immersion in a relaxing virtual reality environment is associated with similar effects on stress and anxiety as heart rate variability biofeedback","authors":"Yvan Pratviel, P. Bouny, V. Deschodt-Arsac","doi":"10.3389/frvir.2024.1358981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Practicing guided breathing at 0.1 Hz in virtual reality yields psychological and physiological benefits. Nonetheless, it remains uncertain whether these effects surpass those induced in a real-world setting. Indeed, the potential influence of the virtual environment on perceived stress and anxiety is not yet fully understood. In this experiment, we aimed to compare the effects of heart rate variability biofeedback combining both haptic and visual cues in real and virtual reality settings among the same group of participants. Additionally, to discern whether the psychological benefits arise from viewing an environment in virtual reality or from the act of performing guided breathing in this specific setting, a “control” immersion condition was introduced. 36 healthy sport students (9 females) participated in this study, performing both the real and virtual reality protocols in a randomized order. Anxiety and stress levels were assessed using the STAI-Y questionnaire and a visual analog scale, respectively. Physiological effects were assessed through measures of heart rate variability, and the performance of cardiac coherence was compared between the real and virtual implementations of guided breathing. As expected, both real and virtual reality heart rate variability biofeedback led to similar physiological modulations and cardiac coherence performances. A decrease in stress and anxiety was observed in both protocols, particularly among participants who initially reported higher stress or anxiety levels. However, no additional changes in psychological states were observed when performing guided breathing while immersed in the virtual environment.","PeriodicalId":73116,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in virtual reality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in virtual reality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2024.1358981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Practicing guided breathing at 0.1 Hz in virtual reality yields psychological and physiological benefits. Nonetheless, it remains uncertain whether these effects surpass those induced in a real-world setting. Indeed, the potential influence of the virtual environment on perceived stress and anxiety is not yet fully understood. In this experiment, we aimed to compare the effects of heart rate variability biofeedback combining both haptic and visual cues in real and virtual reality settings among the same group of participants. Additionally, to discern whether the psychological benefits arise from viewing an environment in virtual reality or from the act of performing guided breathing in this specific setting, a “control” immersion condition was introduced. 36 healthy sport students (9 females) participated in this study, performing both the real and virtual reality protocols in a randomized order. Anxiety and stress levels were assessed using the STAI-Y questionnaire and a visual analog scale, respectively. Physiological effects were assessed through measures of heart rate variability, and the performance of cardiac coherence was compared between the real and virtual implementations of guided breathing. As expected, both real and virtual reality heart rate variability biofeedback led to similar physiological modulations and cardiac coherence performances. A decrease in stress and anxiety was observed in both protocols, particularly among participants who initially reported higher stress or anxiety levels. However, no additional changes in psychological states were observed when performing guided breathing while immersed in the virtual environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沉浸在轻松的虚拟现实环境中对压力和焦虑的影响与心率变异生物反馈相似
在虚拟现实中以 0.1 Hz 的频率练习引导呼吸会产生心理和生理上的益处。然而,这些效果是否超过在真实世界环境中产生的效果仍不确定。事实上,虚拟环境对感知压力和焦虑的潜在影响尚未完全明了。在本实验中,我们的目的是在同一组参与者中,比较在真实和虚拟现实环境中结合触觉和视觉线索的心率变异性生物反馈的效果。此外,为了分辨心理益处是来自于观看虚拟现实环境,还是来自于在这一特定环境中进行引导式呼吸的行为,我们还引入了 "对照 "沉浸条件。36 名健康的体育专业学生(9 名女生)参加了这项研究,他们按照随机顺序执行了真实和虚拟现实协议。焦虑和压力水平分别通过 STAI-Y 问卷和视觉模拟量表进行评估。通过测量心率变异性来评估生理效应,并比较了真实和虚拟引导呼吸的心脏一致性表现。不出所料,真实和虚拟现实的心率变异性生物反馈都带来了相似的生理调节和心脏一致性表现。在两种方案中都观察到了压力和焦虑的减少,尤其是在最初报告压力或焦虑水平较高的参与者中。然而,在沉浸于虚拟环境中进行引导呼吸时,没有观察到心理状态的其他变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Experiential disparities in social VR: uncovering power dynamics and inequality Predictive multiuser redirected walking using artificial potential fields Synergy and medial effects of multimodal cueing with auditory and electrostatic force stimuli on visual field guidance in 360° VR Virtual reality training for intraoperative imaging in orthopaedic surgery: an overview of current progress and future direction Editorial: Virtual agents in virtual reality: design and implications for VR users
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1