Contextual Factors Relevant to Implementing Social Risk Factor Screening and Referrals in Cancer Survivorship: A Qualitative Study

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Preventing Chronic Disease Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.5888/pcd21.230352
Joseph A. Astorino, Mandi L. Pratt-Chapman, L. Schubel, Judith Lee Smith, Arica White, S. Sabatino, Robin Littlejohn, Bryan O Buckley, Teletia Taylor, Hannah Arem
{"title":"Contextual Factors Relevant to Implementing Social Risk Factor Screening and Referrals in Cancer Survivorship: A Qualitative Study","authors":"Joseph A. Astorino, Mandi L. Pratt-Chapman, L. Schubel, Judith Lee Smith, Arica White, S. Sabatino, Robin Littlejohn, Bryan O Buckley, Teletia Taylor, Hannah Arem","doi":"10.5888/pcd21.230352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Social risk factors such as food insecurity and lack of transportation can negatively affect health outcomes, yet implementation of screening and referral for social risk factors is limited in medical settings, particularly in cancer survivorship. Methods We conducted 18 qualitative, semistructured interviews among oncology teams in 3 health systems in Washington, DC, during February and March 2022. We applied the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment Framework to develop a deductive codebook, performed thematic analysis on the interview transcripts, and summarized our results descriptively. Results Health systems varied in clinical and support staff roles and capacity. None of the participating clinics had an electronic health record (EHR)–based process for identifying patients who completed their cancer treatment (“survivors”) or a standardized cancer survivorship program. Their capacities also differed for documenting social risk factors and referrals in the EHR. Interviewees expressed awareness of the prevalence and effect of social risk factors on cancer survivors, but none employed a systematic process for identifying and addressing social risk factors. Recommendations for increasing screening for social risk factors included designating a person to fulfill this role, improving data tracking tools in the EHR, and creating systems to maintain up-to-date information and contacts for community-based organizations. Conclusion The complexity of cancer care workflows and lack of reimbursement results in a limited ability for clinic staff members to screen and make referrals for social risk factors. Creating clinical workflows that are flexible and tailored to staffing realities may contribute to successful implementation of a screening and referral program. Improving ongoing communication with community-based organizations to address needs was deemed important by interviewees.","PeriodicalId":51273,"journal":{"name":"Preventing Chronic Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventing Chronic Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd21.230352","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Social risk factors such as food insecurity and lack of transportation can negatively affect health outcomes, yet implementation of screening and referral for social risk factors is limited in medical settings, particularly in cancer survivorship. Methods We conducted 18 qualitative, semistructured interviews among oncology teams in 3 health systems in Washington, DC, during February and March 2022. We applied the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment Framework to develop a deductive codebook, performed thematic analysis on the interview transcripts, and summarized our results descriptively. Results Health systems varied in clinical and support staff roles and capacity. None of the participating clinics had an electronic health record (EHR)–based process for identifying patients who completed their cancer treatment (“survivors”) or a standardized cancer survivorship program. Their capacities also differed for documenting social risk factors and referrals in the EHR. Interviewees expressed awareness of the prevalence and effect of social risk factors on cancer survivors, but none employed a systematic process for identifying and addressing social risk factors. Recommendations for increasing screening for social risk factors included designating a person to fulfill this role, improving data tracking tools in the EHR, and creating systems to maintain up-to-date information and contacts for community-based organizations. Conclusion The complexity of cancer care workflows and lack of reimbursement results in a limited ability for clinic staff members to screen and make referrals for social risk factors. Creating clinical workflows that are flexible and tailored to staffing realities may contribute to successful implementation of a screening and referral program. Improving ongoing communication with community-based organizations to address needs was deemed important by interviewees.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在癌症幸存者中实施社会风险因素筛查和转介的相关背景因素:定性研究
导言 粮食不安全和交通不便等社会风险因素会对健康结果产生负面影响,但在医疗机构中,尤其是在癌症幸存者中,针对社会风险因素的筛查和转诊实施却很有限。方法 我们在 2022 年 2 月至 3 月期间对华盛顿特区 3 个医疗系统的肿瘤团队进行了 18 次半结构式定性访谈。我们运用 "探索、准备、实施、维持 "框架编制了演绎编码手册,对访谈记录进行了主题分析,并对结果进行了描述性总结。结果 医疗系统的临床和辅助人员的角色和能力各不相同。参与调查的诊所都没有基于电子健康记录(EHR)的流程来识别已完成癌症治疗的患者("幸存者"),也没有标准化的癌症幸存者计划。他们在电子病历中记录社会风险因素和转诊情况的能力也各不相同。受访者表示意识到社会风险因素对癌症幸存者的普遍性和影响,但没有人采用系统的流程来识别和处理社会风险因素。关于加强社会风险因素筛查的建议包括指定专人履行这一职责、改进电子病历中的数据跟踪工具以及创建系统以维护社区组织的最新信息和联系方式。结论 癌症护理工作流程的复杂性和缺乏补偿导致诊所工作人员筛查和转介社会风险因素的能力有限。建立灵活且符合人员实际情况的临床工作流程可能有助于筛查和转诊计划的成功实施。受访者认为,改善与社区组织的持续沟通以满足需求非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Preventing Chronic Disease
Preventing Chronic Disease PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Preventing Chronic Disease (PCD) is a peer-reviewed electronic journal established by the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. The mission of PCD is to promote the open exchange of information and knowledge among researchers, practitioners, policy makers, and others who strive to improve the health of the public through chronic disease prevention. The vision of PCD is to be the premier forum where practitioners and policy makers inform research and researchers help practitioners and policy makers more effectively improve the health of the population. Articles focus on preventing and controlling chronic diseases and conditions, promoting health, and examining the biological, behavioral, physical, and social determinants of health and their impact on quality of life, morbidity, and mortality across the life span.
期刊最新文献
Demonstrated Progress and Future Promise of Chronic Disease Data Modernization. Geospatial Hot Spots and Cold Spots in US Cancer Disparities and Associated Risk Factors, 2004-2008 to 2014-2018. Recruitment and Retention in the National Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Change Program in Two Federally Qualified Health Centers in Rural Hawai'i. Association Between Diet and Mental Health Outcomes in a Sample of 13,887 Adolescents in Canada. Moving Diabetes Prevention Programs to the Workplace: A Qualitative Exploration of Barriers and Facilitators to Participant Engagement When Implemented by an Employer-Based Clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1