Utilization of Cervical Cancer Screening Services and its Predictors among Health Workers in Hospitals in the Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria

P. Okonkwo, O. Ajayi, A. Isah, B.G. Oladapo
{"title":"Utilization of Cervical Cancer Screening Services and its Predictors among Health Workers in Hospitals in the Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria","authors":"P. Okonkwo, O. Ajayi, A. Isah, B.G. Oladapo","doi":"10.4314/jcmphc.v36i1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cervical cancer (CC) ranks second as the leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality in Nigeria, despite being  preventable through screening. Female health workers (HCWs) are expected to be role models to motivate society towards Cervical  Cancer Screening Service (CCSS)uptake. This study assesses the utilization of CCSS and associated factors among HCWs in three area  councils of Abuja, Nigeria. \nMethod: A cross-sectional design aimed at assessing the utilization of CCSS by HCWs in 13 health facilities across 3 area councils in Abuja.  Study participants were selected using a multi-stage sampling technique. The outcome variable was “ever used CCSS”  dichotomized into a “Yes” or “No” response. Factors associated with participants' utilization of CCSS were examined using a binary  logistic regression at p<0.05 level of statistical significance. \nResults: Data from 350 participants (90.6%) were analyzed. Most were  married women, 290 (82.9%), between the ages of 21 to 30 years, 275 (78.6%). About twothirds of the participants, (237) reported ever  being screened for cervical cancer. Factors associated with CCSS utilization at the bivariate level included marital status, duration of  practice, and a negative perception regarding access to cervical cancer services. Perceived access barrier to CCSS was the only strong  predictor for CCSS utilization after controlling confounders [Adjusted Odd Ratio: 0.01, 95%CI: 0.01 – 0.03]. \nConclusion: The perceived  access barrier is a strong determinant of the CCSS utilization rate among HCWs in our study site Efforts should be made to ensure access  and create awareness about service availability and accessibility among HCWs in the Federal Capital Territory. ","PeriodicalId":504295,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Medicine and Primary Health Care","volume":"1 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Medicine and Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/jcmphc.v36i1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer (CC) ranks second as the leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality in Nigeria, despite being  preventable through screening. Female health workers (HCWs) are expected to be role models to motivate society towards Cervical  Cancer Screening Service (CCSS)uptake. This study assesses the utilization of CCSS and associated factors among HCWs in three area  councils of Abuja, Nigeria. Method: A cross-sectional design aimed at assessing the utilization of CCSS by HCWs in 13 health facilities across 3 area councils in Abuja.  Study participants were selected using a multi-stage sampling technique. The outcome variable was “ever used CCSS”  dichotomized into a “Yes” or “No” response. Factors associated with participants' utilization of CCSS were examined using a binary  logistic regression at p<0.05 level of statistical significance. Results: Data from 350 participants (90.6%) were analyzed. Most were  married women, 290 (82.9%), between the ages of 21 to 30 years, 275 (78.6%). About twothirds of the participants, (237) reported ever  being screened for cervical cancer. Factors associated with CCSS utilization at the bivariate level included marital status, duration of  practice, and a negative perception regarding access to cervical cancer services. Perceived access barrier to CCSS was the only strong  predictor for CCSS utilization after controlling confounders [Adjusted Odd Ratio: 0.01, 95%CI: 0.01 – 0.03]. Conclusion: The perceived  access barrier is a strong determinant of the CCSS utilization rate among HCWs in our study site Efforts should be made to ensure access  and create awareness about service availability and accessibility among HCWs in the Federal Capital Territory. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚联邦首都区医院卫生工作者利用宫颈癌筛查服务的情况及其预测因素
背景:尽管宫颈癌(CC)可以通过筛查来预防,但它在尼日利亚癌症发病率和死亡率中排名第二。女性卫生工作者(HCWs)有望成为激励社会接受宫颈癌筛查服务(CCSS)的榜样。本研究评估了尼日利亚阿布贾三个地区委员会的女卫生工作者对宫颈癌筛查服务的利用情况及相关因素。研究方法采用横断面设计,旨在评估阿布贾 3 个区议会 13 家医疗机构的医护人员对 CCSS 的使用情况。 研究参与者采用多阶段抽样技术选出。结果变量为 "是否使用过CCSS",二分法为 "是 "或 "否"。研究采用二元逻辑回归法对参与者使用 CCSS 的相关因素进行了检验,统计显著性水平为 p<0.05。结果对 350 名参与者(90.6%)的数据进行了分析。大部分为已婚女性,290 人(82.9%),年龄在 21-30 岁之间,275 人(78.6%)。约三分之二的参与者(237 人)表示曾接受过宫颈癌筛查。在双变量水平上,与使用宫颈癌筛查服务相关的因素包括婚姻状况、从业时间以及对获得宫颈癌服务的负面看法。在控制了混杂因素后,宫颈癌筛查服务的认知障碍是唯一能有力预测宫颈癌筛查服务使用情况的因素[调整奇数比:0.01,95%CI:0.01 - 0.03]。结论在我们的研究地点,感知到的获取障碍是影响HCW使用CCSS的一个重要决定因素,应努力确保联邦首都地区的HCW能够获取服务并提高他们对服务可用性和可获取性的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pharmaceutical Promotions and Compliance with Community-Acquired Pneumonia Prescribing Guidelines by General Practitioners in Mbarara Diagnostic Accuracy of Antigen-Based Rapid Test during the Fourth Wave of COVID-19 in Edo State, Nigeria Intimate Partner Violence among Mothers of Children with Sickle Cell Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of 2018 Nigeria DHS Data Assessing the Job Satisfaction of Some Physicians in Rwanda and the Associated Factors Identifying Barriers to Utilization of Basic Emergency Obstetric and NewBorn Care Services in Jigawa State, North-western Nigeria: A Qualitative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1