Social workers and xenophobia: The case of Türkiye

Umut Yanardağ, Melek Zubaroğlu Yanardağ, Meryem Gül
{"title":"Social workers and xenophobia: The case of Türkiye","authors":"Umut Yanardağ, Melek Zubaroğlu Yanardağ, Meryem Gül","doi":"10.1177/14680173241240979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, xenophobia has become an increasingly important area of research in social work. This study was conducted in the South-Eastern Anatolia and the Mediterranean regions of Türkiye, both of which are densely populated by immigrants. In the study, the mixed method was conducted on social workers working in these regions. In the quantitative section, the Xenophobia Scale was applied on 242 social workers. In the qualitative section, 35 social workers were interviewed. The findings revealed that married social workers were more xenophobic than their single counterparts ( p ≤ .05). While those who did not receive training on immigration tended to be more xenophobic than those who received training ( p ≤ .000), those who worked in the Mediterranean region tended to be more xenophobic compared to their counterparts who worked in the South-eastern Anatolia region ( p ≤ .05). In the qualitative section featured 35 social workers who fell into three categories: those who did not use xenophobic expressions but were disturbed by the problems that arose with living with immigrants, those who used xenophobic expressions, and those who did not use xenophobic expressions at all. This study's findings highlight the significant role of non-xenophobic social workers in the field of migration. Additionally, it emphasizes the necessity for xenophobia-focused trainings for social workers. In conclusion, there is potential for enhancing non-xenophobic practices among social workers in the field.","PeriodicalId":515680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work","volume":"31 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173241240979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, xenophobia has become an increasingly important area of research in social work. This study was conducted in the South-Eastern Anatolia and the Mediterranean regions of Türkiye, both of which are densely populated by immigrants. In the study, the mixed method was conducted on social workers working in these regions. In the quantitative section, the Xenophobia Scale was applied on 242 social workers. In the qualitative section, 35 social workers were interviewed. The findings revealed that married social workers were more xenophobic than their single counterparts ( p ≤ .05). While those who did not receive training on immigration tended to be more xenophobic than those who received training ( p ≤ .000), those who worked in the Mediterranean region tended to be more xenophobic compared to their counterparts who worked in the South-eastern Anatolia region ( p ≤ .05). In the qualitative section featured 35 social workers who fell into three categories: those who did not use xenophobic expressions but were disturbed by the problems that arose with living with immigrants, those who used xenophobic expressions, and those who did not use xenophobic expressions at all. This study's findings highlight the significant role of non-xenophobic social workers in the field of migration. Additionally, it emphasizes the necessity for xenophobia-focused trainings for social workers. In conclusion, there is potential for enhancing non-xenophobic practices among social workers in the field.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会工作者与仇外心理:土耳其的案例
近年来,仇外心理已成为社会工作中一个日益重要的研究领域。本研究在土耳其安纳托利亚东南部和地中海地区进行,这两个地区都是移民密集区。在研究中,对在这些地区工作的社会工作者采用了混合方法。在定量部分,对 242 名社会工作者使用了仇外心理量表。在定性部分,对 35 名社工进行了访谈。结果显示,已婚社工比单身社工更排外(P ≤ .05)。没有接受过移民培训的社工比接受过培训的社工更排外(p ≤ .000),在地中海地区工作的社工比在安纳托利亚东南部地区工作的社工更排外(p ≤ .05)。在定性研究部分,35 名社会工作者被分为三类:没有使用仇外表达方式但对与移民共处时出现的问题感到不安的人,使用仇外表达方式的人,以及完全不使用仇外表达方式的人。本研究的结果凸显了不仇外的社会工作者在移民领域的重要作用。此外,研究还强调了对社会工作者进行仇外心理培训的必要性。总之,有可能在该领域的社会工作者中加强不仇外的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social workers’ perspectives on adapting methods during the COVID-19 pandemic Social workers in schools: A feasibility study of three local authorities Impact of COVID-19 on home care provision: A qualitative study Social work with Irish Travellers: Findings from a national evaluation Canadian social workers’ attitudes toward immigrants with different legal statuses in Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1