Searching for the Most Suited Distribution and Estimation Method for At-Site Flood Frequency Analysis: A Case of the Chenab River

S. H. Bhatti, Muhammad Umar, S. Shongwe, Muhammad Irfan, Mahmood Ul Hassan
{"title":"Searching for the Most Suited Distribution\nand Estimation Method for At-Site Flood Frequency\nAnalysis: A Case of the Chenab River","authors":"S. H. Bhatti, Muhammad Umar, S. Shongwe, Muhammad Irfan, Mahmood Ul Hassan","doi":"10.15244/pjoes/185970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with at-site flood frequency analysis for different gauging stations of the Chenab River in Pakistan. The study aimed at recommending the most suitable probability distribution and efficient method of parameter estimation for each gauging site. Generalized extreme value, generalized logistic, Gumbel, generalized Pareto, and reverse Gumbel probability models are fitted to the annual peak flow/discharge. For each gauging site, the parameters of these distributions are estimated through L-moments, maximum likelihood, least squares, weighted least squares, and relative least squares methods. For each site, the probability models with a particular estimation method are ranked on the basis of goodness-of-tests and accuracy measures, and then the most suitable pair of model and estimation method is identified through a total rank. The results indicate that the generalized Pareto distribution is the best fit for Marala, Khanki, Qadirabad, and Punjnad, while the generalized extreme value distribution is the most suited for the Trimmu gauging site. As far as the estimation method is concerned, least squares and weighted least squares methods are more accurate for most of the gauging sites. Finally, for each gauging site, the best-suited probability model is used to estimate the annual peak flow and to construct associated confidence intervals for different return years.","PeriodicalId":510399,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Environmental Studies","volume":"194 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Environmental Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/185970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with at-site flood frequency analysis for different gauging stations of the Chenab River in Pakistan. The study aimed at recommending the most suitable probability distribution and efficient method of parameter estimation for each gauging site. Generalized extreme value, generalized logistic, Gumbel, generalized Pareto, and reverse Gumbel probability models are fitted to the annual peak flow/discharge. For each gauging site, the parameters of these distributions are estimated through L-moments, maximum likelihood, least squares, weighted least squares, and relative least squares methods. For each site, the probability models with a particular estimation method are ranked on the basis of goodness-of-tests and accuracy measures, and then the most suitable pair of model and estimation method is identified through a total rank. The results indicate that the generalized Pareto distribution is the best fit for Marala, Khanki, Qadirabad, and Punjnad, while the generalized extreme value distribution is the most suited for the Trimmu gauging site. As far as the estimation method is concerned, least squares and weighted least squares methods are more accurate for most of the gauging sites. Finally, for each gauging site, the best-suited probability model is used to estimate the annual peak flow and to construct associated confidence intervals for different return years.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为现场洪水频率分析寻找最合适的分布和估算方法:切纳布河案例
文章论述了对巴基斯坦切纳布河不同测站的现场洪水频率分析。研究旨在为每个测站推荐最合适的概率分布和有效的参数估计方法。对年峰值流量/排水量拟合了广义极值、广义对数、Gumbel、广义帕累托和反向 Gumbel 概率模型。对于每个测站,这些分布的参数通过 L-矩、最大似然法、最小二乘法、加权最小二乘法和相对最小二乘法进行估算。对于每个测站,采用特定估算方法的概率模型将根据检验结果和精度指标进行排序,然后通过总排序确定最合适的模型和估算方法。结果表明,广义帕累托分布最适合马拉拉、汉基、卡迪拉巴德和蓬杰纳德,而广义极值分布最适合特里姆测站。就估算方法而言,最小二乘法和加权最小二乘法对大多数测站都更为准确。最后,对于每个测站,采用最合适的概率模型估算年峰值流量,并构建不同回归年的相关置信区间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Straw Biochar Production and Carbon Emission Reduction Potential in the Yangtze River Economic Belt Region Impact of Biogas Slurry on Physiological and Antioxidant Mechanisms of Wheat Under Drought Stress Adsorption of Reactive Blue 13 from Dyeing Wastewater onto Mesoporous Carbon Xerogels Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Triple and Single-Capsule Sesame (Sesamum Indicum L.) Varieties and Their Antioxidant Enzyme Activities Has Green Credit Promoted High-Quality Economic Development? Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1