A comparison between fenoterol/ipratropium bromide combinations and salbutamol administered as nebulizer solutions assessing dose-response and duration of action.

Pharmatherapeutica Pub Date : 1986-01-01
D McIntosh
{"title":"A comparison between fenoterol/ipratropium bromide combinations and salbutamol administered as nebulizer solutions assessing dose-response and duration of action.","authors":"D McIntosh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A double-blind, randomized crossover trial was carried out in 10 patients with reversible airways obstruction to assess dose-response and duration of action of 0.5 mg ipratropium combined with 1.25 mg, 2.5 mg or 5.0 mg fenoterol compared with 5.0 mg salbutamol given alone. Each solution was nebulized from a volume of 4 ml and administered via a mouth-piece at approximately the same time on each of 4 test days. Measurements were made of FEV1, FVC and PEFR before and at intervals after nebulization. The results showed that each dose of the combination produced greater improvements in the lung function parameters than did salbutamol alone and the degree of response was proportional to the dose of the combination. No significant treatment differences were recorded in systolic or diastolic blood pressure between any of the treatments, but the combined preparations produced significantly higher pulse rates than did salbutamol.</p>","PeriodicalId":19862,"journal":{"name":"Pharmatherapeutica","volume":"4 7","pages":"416-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmatherapeutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A double-blind, randomized crossover trial was carried out in 10 patients with reversible airways obstruction to assess dose-response and duration of action of 0.5 mg ipratropium combined with 1.25 mg, 2.5 mg or 5.0 mg fenoterol compared with 5.0 mg salbutamol given alone. Each solution was nebulized from a volume of 4 ml and administered via a mouth-piece at approximately the same time on each of 4 test days. Measurements were made of FEV1, FVC and PEFR before and at intervals after nebulization. The results showed that each dose of the combination produced greater improvements in the lung function parameters than did salbutamol alone and the degree of response was proportional to the dose of the combination. No significant treatment differences were recorded in systolic or diastolic blood pressure between any of the treatments, but the combined preparations produced significantly higher pulse rates than did salbutamol.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非诺特罗/异丙托溴铵联合使用与沙丁胺醇作为雾化器溶液的比较,评估剂量反应和作用时间。
在10例可逆性气道阻塞患者中进行了一项双盲、随机交叉试验,以评估0.5 mg异丙托品联合1.25 mg、2.5 mg或5.0 mg非诺特罗与单独给药5.0 mg沙丁胺醇的剂量反应和作用时间。每种溶液从4ml的体积中雾化,并在4个测试天的每一天大约同一时间通过口片给药。在雾化前和雾化后间隔时间测量FEV1、FVC和PEFR。结果表明,与单独使用沙丁胺醇相比,每一剂量的联合用药对肺功能参数的改善更大,而且反应程度与联合用药剂量成正比。在收缩压和舒张压方面,两种治疗方法均无显著差异,但联合用药产生的脉搏率明显高于沙丁胺醇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flupenthixol and fluvoxamine in mild to moderate depression: a comparison in general practice. Treatment of chronic occlusive arterial disease with pentoxifylline: changes in clinical and haemodynamic parameters. Effects of penbutolol on plasma atrial natriuretic peptide and antidiuretic hormone levels before and after exercise: a double-blind comparison against placebo. Absence of interaction between ramipril, a new ACE-inhibitor, and phenprocoumon, an anticoagulant agent. Zuclopenthixol and haloperidol/levomepromazine in the treatment of elderly patients with symptoms of aggressiveness and agitation: a double-blind, multi-centre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1