Antimicrobial efficacy of newly prepared nano-tricalcium silicate-58s bioactive glass-based endodontic sealer

Q3 Dentistry Endodontology Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.4103/endo.endo_128_23
N. Al-Sabawi, Sawsan Al-jubori
{"title":"Antimicrobial efficacy of newly prepared nano-tricalcium silicate-58s bioactive glass-based endodontic sealer","authors":"N. Al-Sabawi, Sawsan Al-jubori","doi":"10.4103/endo.endo_128_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Endodontic sealers with antimicrobial impact are considered relevant to prevent re-infection and ensure healing of damaged periapical tissue. Hence, this study aimed to assist the antimicrobial effect of newly developed nano-tricalcium silicate-58s bioactive glass (BG)-based endodontic sealer (C3S-BG-P), and compare its results with Nishika Canal Sealer BG and BioRoot™ root canal sealer (RCS).\n \n \n \n The antimicrobial impact of endodontic sealers was evaluated by both agar diffusion test (ADT) and direct contact test (DCT) against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans. In ADT, the diameter of inhibition zones was measured after 1, 2, and 3 days of incubation using Digimizer software program. In DCT, the sealers were allowed to set for 1, 7, and 14 days and then exposed to the microbial suspension for 24 h. The colony-forming unit was counted using ImageJ software program. The data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey’s tests.\n \n \n \n In ADT, all the tested sealers showed antimicrobial effect after 3 days, with no significant difference after 1 day, but the impact of C3S-BG-P and Nishika significantly higher than that of BioRoot after 2 and 3 days. In DCT, C3S-BG-P and Nishika had an antimicrobial effect against both isolates even after 14 days of their setting, whereas BioRoot had an effect for 7 days of its setting and lost its impact after 14 days.\n \n \n \n C3S-BG-P explored antimicrobial impact superior to that of BioRoot and nearly comparable to that of Nishika against E. faecalis and C. albicans, which last even after 14 days of its setting.\n","PeriodicalId":11607,"journal":{"name":"Endodontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_128_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endodontic sealers with antimicrobial impact are considered relevant to prevent re-infection and ensure healing of damaged periapical tissue. Hence, this study aimed to assist the antimicrobial effect of newly developed nano-tricalcium silicate-58s bioactive glass (BG)-based endodontic sealer (C3S-BG-P), and compare its results with Nishika Canal Sealer BG and BioRoot™ root canal sealer (RCS). The antimicrobial impact of endodontic sealers was evaluated by both agar diffusion test (ADT) and direct contact test (DCT) against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans. In ADT, the diameter of inhibition zones was measured after 1, 2, and 3 days of incubation using Digimizer software program. In DCT, the sealers were allowed to set for 1, 7, and 14 days and then exposed to the microbial suspension for 24 h. The colony-forming unit was counted using ImageJ software program. The data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey’s tests. In ADT, all the tested sealers showed antimicrobial effect after 3 days, with no significant difference after 1 day, but the impact of C3S-BG-P and Nishika significantly higher than that of BioRoot after 2 and 3 days. In DCT, C3S-BG-P and Nishika had an antimicrobial effect against both isolates even after 14 days of their setting, whereas BioRoot had an effect for 7 days of its setting and lost its impact after 14 days. C3S-BG-P explored antimicrobial impact superior to that of BioRoot and nearly comparable to that of Nishika against E. faecalis and C. albicans, which last even after 14 days of its setting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新制备的纳米硅酸钙-58s 生物活性玻璃牙髓封闭剂的抗菌功效
具有抗菌作用的牙髓封闭剂被认为对防止再感染和确保受损根尖周组织的愈合具有重要意义。因此,本研究旨在协助研究新开发的基于纳米硅酸钙-58s 生物活性玻璃 (BG) 的牙髓封闭剂(C3S-BG-P)的抗菌效果,并将其结果与 Nishika Canal Sealer BG 和 BioRoot™ root canal sealer (RCS) 进行比较。 通过琼脂扩散试验(ADT)和直接接触试验(DCT)评估了根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌和白色念珠菌的抗菌效果。在 ADT 试验中,使用 Digimizer 软件程序在培养 1、2 和 3 天后测量抑制区的直径。在 DCT 中,先让密封剂静置 1、7 和 14 天,然后将其暴露在微生物悬浮液中 24 小时,使用 ImageJ 软件程序计算菌落形成单位。数据采用方差分析和 Tukey 检验进行分析。 在 ADT 中,所有测试的封闭剂在 3 天后都显示出抗菌效果,1 天后无显著差异,但在 2 天和 3 天后,C3S-BG-P 和 Nishika 的抗菌效果明显高于 BioRoot。在 DCT 中,C3S-BG-P 和 Nishika 设置 14 天后仍对两种分离菌有抗菌作用,而 BioRoot 设置 7 天后有作用,14 天后失去作用。 C3S-BG-P 对粪肠球菌和白僵菌的抗菌效果优于 BioRoot,几乎与 Nishika 相当,甚至在放置 14 天后仍有效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endodontology
Endodontology Medicine-Anatomy
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative evaluation of the clinical and radiographic success of regenerative endodontic procedures in immature versus mature permanent incisors with apical periodontitis: A prospective observational study Sealing efficacy of various rubber dam barrier materials used for isolation procedures: A randomized controlled trial Evaluation of fracture resistance of radicular dentin treated with nanochitosan-loaded calcium hydroxide and nanographene-loaded calcium hydroxide, when used as intracanal medicament: An in vitro study Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars using indirect and direct composite onlays: A comparative study Effect of bonding pericervical dentin with reinforcing materials on strength of root-filled mandibular single-canal premolars: An in vitro study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1