Bringing clarity and transparency to the consultative process underpinning the implementation of an ethics framework for AI-based healthcare applications: a qualitative study

Magali Goirand, Elizabeth Austin, Robyn Clay-Williams
{"title":"Bringing clarity and transparency to the consultative process underpinning the implementation of an ethics framework for AI-based healthcare applications: a qualitative study","authors":"Magali Goirand,&nbsp;Elizabeth Austin,&nbsp;Robyn Clay-Williams","doi":"10.1007/s43681-024-00466-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied in healthcare to address various aspects of the COVID-19 crisis including early detection, diagnosis and treatment, and population monitoring. Despite the urgency to develop AI solutions for COVID-19 problems, considering the ethical implications of those solutions remains critical. Implementing ethics frameworks in AI-based healthcare applications is a wicked issue that calls for an inclusive, and transparent participatory process. In this qualitative study, we set up a participatory process to explore assumptions and expectations about ethical issues associated with development of a COVID-19 monitoring AI-based app from a diverse group of stakeholders including patients, physicians, and technology developers. We also sought to understand the influence the consultative process had on the participants’ understanding of the issues. Eighteen participants were presented with a fictitious AI-based app whose features included individual self-monitoring of potential infection, physicians’ remote monitoring of symptoms for patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and tracking of infection clusters by health agencies. We found that implementing an ethics framework is systemic by nature, and that ethics principles and stakeholders need to be considered in relation to one another. We also found that the AI app introduced a novel channel for knowledge between the stakeholders. Mapping the flow of knowledge has the potential to illuminate ethical issues in a holistic way.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 6","pages":"5621 - 5641"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-024-00466-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-024-00466-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied in healthcare to address various aspects of the COVID-19 crisis including early detection, diagnosis and treatment, and population monitoring. Despite the urgency to develop AI solutions for COVID-19 problems, considering the ethical implications of those solutions remains critical. Implementing ethics frameworks in AI-based healthcare applications is a wicked issue that calls for an inclusive, and transparent participatory process. In this qualitative study, we set up a participatory process to explore assumptions and expectations about ethical issues associated with development of a COVID-19 monitoring AI-based app from a diverse group of stakeholders including patients, physicians, and technology developers. We also sought to understand the influence the consultative process had on the participants’ understanding of the issues. Eighteen participants were presented with a fictitious AI-based app whose features included individual self-monitoring of potential infection, physicians’ remote monitoring of symptoms for patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and tracking of infection clusters by health agencies. We found that implementing an ethics framework is systemic by nature, and that ethics principles and stakeholders need to be considered in relation to one another. We also found that the AI app introduced a novel channel for knowledge between the stakeholders. Mapping the flow of knowledge has the potential to illuminate ethical issues in a holistic way.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为基于人工智能的医疗应用伦理框架的实施提供清晰透明的磋商过程:一项定性研究
人工智能(AI)已被应用于医疗保健领域,以应对COVID-19危机的各个方面,包括早期发现、诊断和治疗以及人口监测。尽管迫切需要为COVID-19问题开发人工智能解决方案,但考虑到这些解决方案的伦理影响仍然至关重要。在基于人工智能的医疗保健应用程序中实施道德框架是一个棘手的问题,需要一个包容、透明的参与过程。在这项定性研究中,我们建立了一个参与性过程,以探索来自不同利益相关者群体(包括患者、医生和技术开发人员)的关于COVID-19监测人工智能应用程序开发相关伦理问题的假设和期望。我们还试图了解协商进程对与会者对这些问题的理解所产生的影响。18名参与者使用了一个虚构的基于人工智能的应用程序,其功能包括个人自我监测潜在感染,医生远程监测诊断为COVID-19的患者的症状,以及卫生机构跟踪感染聚集性。我们发现,实施道德框架本质上是系统性的,道德原则和利益相关者需要相互考虑。我们还发现,人工智能应用程序在利益相关者之间引入了一种新的知识渠道。绘制知识流动图有可能以一种全面的方式阐明伦理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Beyond black-box medicine: a bioethical considerations for informed consent in AI-driven endoscopy Rectifying illusion: a Buddhist–Confucian framework for LLM hallucinations A dynamic contextual responsibility framework for evaluating large language models in socio-technical contexts Political fantasies of fairness: artificial intelligence, law, and the myth of sovereign reason A critical analysis of the ethical benefits and challenges related to the development and use of wearable AI devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1