Exploring dentists’ preferences for post-endodontic restorations in India: A questionnaire based study

Q3 Dentistry Endodontology Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.4103/endo.endo_142_23
Reetika Singh, Sachin Gupta, V. Nikhil, S. Jaiswal
{"title":"Exploring dentists’ preferences for post-endodontic restorations in India: A questionnaire based study","authors":"Reetika Singh, Sachin Gupta, V. Nikhil, S. Jaiswal","doi":"10.4103/endo.endo_142_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n This study aimed to investigate the selection of postendodontic restorative materials and techniques for both anterior and posterior teeth by Indian endodontists and nonendodontists, along with other influencing factors.\n \n \n \n A total of 700 dentists, including both endodontists and nonendodontists, participated in this survey. The survey consisted of 22 questions and was administered through Google Forms and various online platforms. Participants were required to provide informed consent before completing the questionnaire.\n \n \n \n The majority of endodontists (80.3%) and nonendodontists (72.6%) revealed a preference for resin composite as the primary restorative material for postendodontic restoration. Approximately half of the endodontists (50.0%) and 67.8% of nonendodontists typically waited for 1 week before proceeding with postendodontic restoration, with the presence of periapical lesions being the most common reason for this delay. Both endodontists (81.7%) and nonendodontists (73.4%) considered the amount of remaining tooth structure as the most crucial factor in guiding their choice of postendodontic restoration. The majority of both endodontists (75.3%) and nonendodontists (81.4%) preferred full-coverage crowns as the definitive postendodontic restoration. Furthermore, endodontists (95.4%) and nonendodontists (85.5%) reported that they only performed post and core restoration when necessary, and 84.7% of endodontists and 76.5% of nonendodontists believed that post and core restorations aided in supporting crowns.\n \n \n \n The outcomes of the survey imply that while endodontists in India demonstrate a more comprehensive comprehension of postendodontic restoration concepts, nonendodontists also exhibit a sufficient level of understanding essential for achieving clinical success.\n","PeriodicalId":11607,"journal":{"name":"Endodontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_142_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the selection of postendodontic restorative materials and techniques for both anterior and posterior teeth by Indian endodontists and nonendodontists, along with other influencing factors. A total of 700 dentists, including both endodontists and nonendodontists, participated in this survey. The survey consisted of 22 questions and was administered through Google Forms and various online platforms. Participants were required to provide informed consent before completing the questionnaire. The majority of endodontists (80.3%) and nonendodontists (72.6%) revealed a preference for resin composite as the primary restorative material for postendodontic restoration. Approximately half of the endodontists (50.0%) and 67.8% of nonendodontists typically waited for 1 week before proceeding with postendodontic restoration, with the presence of periapical lesions being the most common reason for this delay. Both endodontists (81.7%) and nonendodontists (73.4%) considered the amount of remaining tooth structure as the most crucial factor in guiding their choice of postendodontic restoration. The majority of both endodontists (75.3%) and nonendodontists (81.4%) preferred full-coverage crowns as the definitive postendodontic restoration. Furthermore, endodontists (95.4%) and nonendodontists (85.5%) reported that they only performed post and core restoration when necessary, and 84.7% of endodontists and 76.5% of nonendodontists believed that post and core restorations aided in supporting crowns. The outcomes of the survey imply that while endodontists in India demonstrate a more comprehensive comprehension of postendodontic restoration concepts, nonendodontists also exhibit a sufficient level of understanding essential for achieving clinical success.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索印度牙医对根管治疗后修复体的偏好:基于问卷的研究
本研究旨在调查印度牙髓病学家和非牙髓病学家对前牙和后牙的牙髓后修复材料和技术的选择以及其他影响因素。 共有 700 名牙科医生参加了此次调查,其中包括牙髓病学家和非牙髓病学家。调查包括 22 个问题,通过谷歌表格和各种在线平台进行。在填写问卷之前,参与者需要提供知情同意书。 大多数牙体牙髓病学家(80.3%)和非牙体牙髓病学家(72.6%)表示倾向于将树脂复合材料作为牙体牙髓病学后修复的主要修复材料。大约一半的牙髓病学家(50.0%)和 67.8% 的非牙髓病学家通常会等待一周后才进行牙髓病后修复,而根尖周病变的存在是造成这种延迟的最常见原因。牙髓病学家(81.7%)和非牙髓病学家(73.4%)都认为剩余牙齿结构的数量是指导他们选择牙髓术后修复的最关键因素。大多数牙髓病学家(75.3%)和非牙髓病学家(81.4%)都倾向于选择全覆盖冠作为牙髓病后的最终修复体。此外,牙体牙髓科医生(95.4%)和非牙体牙髓科医生(85.5%)表示,他们只在必要时进行桩核修复,84.7%的牙体牙髓科医生和 76.5%的非牙体牙髓科医生认为桩核修复有助于支持牙冠。 调查结果表明,虽然印度的牙髓病学家对根管治疗后修复概念的理解更为全面,但非牙髓病学家也表现出了足够的理解水平,这对取得临床成功至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endodontology
Endodontology Medicine-Anatomy
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative evaluation of the clinical and radiographic success of regenerative endodontic procedures in immature versus mature permanent incisors with apical periodontitis: A prospective observational study Sealing efficacy of various rubber dam barrier materials used for isolation procedures: A randomized controlled trial Evaluation of fracture resistance of radicular dentin treated with nanochitosan-loaded calcium hydroxide and nanographene-loaded calcium hydroxide, when used as intracanal medicament: An in vitro study Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars using indirect and direct composite onlays: A comparative study Effect of bonding pericervical dentin with reinforcing materials on strength of root-filled mandibular single-canal premolars: An in vitro study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1