Developing the AMPHORA policy guidelines for heritage projects as mental health interventions: a Delphi consultation

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Mental Health Review Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1108/mhrj-12-2022-0076
Karen J. Burnell, Paul Everill, Eva Makri, Louise Baxter, Kathryn Watson
{"title":"Developing the AMPHORA policy guidelines for heritage projects as mental health interventions: a Delphi consultation","authors":"Karen J. Burnell, Paul Everill, Eva Makri, Louise Baxter, Kathryn Watson","doi":"10.1108/mhrj-12-2022-0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nEngaging with heritage to support mental health and wellbeing has become a focus of research and policy, more recently moving towards social prescription of heritage interventions. While there are benefits to active participation, there are potential risks to those taking part and to the non-renewable historic remains and landscape that form the core of these projects. The purpose of the current research paper was to develop best practice guidelines for organisations offering heritage projects as interventions for people who live with mental health issues to protect both participants and heritage.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThere were two research phases; a Sandpit with World Café discussions to produce a set of research priorities, and a Delphi Consultation, using three questionnaires distributed over six months, to develop best practice guidelines. The panel in both phases comprised experts through lived experience, policy, practice and research.\n\n\nFindings\nThe Authentic and Meaningful Participation in Heritage or Related Activities (AMPHORA) guidelines cover three stages: project development, project delivery and project follow-up, with a set of action points for each stage. Of particular importance was authentic participation and expertise to ensure appropriate management of heritage/ historic environment assets and support for participants.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe AMPHORA guidelines can assist all organisations in the delivery of safe projects that support the mental health of those involved, as well as enhancing and protecting the historic environment.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, these are the first research-led guidelines that help heritage organisations support those living with mental health issues.\n","PeriodicalId":45687,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Review Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Review Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mhrj-12-2022-0076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Engaging with heritage to support mental health and wellbeing has become a focus of research and policy, more recently moving towards social prescription of heritage interventions. While there are benefits to active participation, there are potential risks to those taking part and to the non-renewable historic remains and landscape that form the core of these projects. The purpose of the current research paper was to develop best practice guidelines for organisations offering heritage projects as interventions for people who live with mental health issues to protect both participants and heritage. Design/methodology/approach There were two research phases; a Sandpit with World Café discussions to produce a set of research priorities, and a Delphi Consultation, using three questionnaires distributed over six months, to develop best practice guidelines. The panel in both phases comprised experts through lived experience, policy, practice and research. Findings The Authentic and Meaningful Participation in Heritage or Related Activities (AMPHORA) guidelines cover three stages: project development, project delivery and project follow-up, with a set of action points for each stage. Of particular importance was authentic participation and expertise to ensure appropriate management of heritage/ historic environment assets and support for participants. Social implications The AMPHORA guidelines can assist all organisations in the delivery of safe projects that support the mental health of those involved, as well as enhancing and protecting the historic environment. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, these are the first research-led guidelines that help heritage organisations support those living with mental health issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定作为心理健康干预措施的遗产项目的 AMPHORA 政策指南:德尔菲咨询法
目的 利用遗产支持心理健康和幸福已成为研究和政策的重点,最近正朝着遗产干预的社会方 向发展。积极参与固然有好处,但对参与者以及构成这些项目核心的不可再生的历史遗存和景观也有潜在风险。本研究论文的目的是为提供遗产项目的组织制定最佳实践指南,作为对有心理健康问题的人的干预措施,以保护参与者和遗产。设计/方法/途径研究分为两个阶段:通过世界咖啡馆(World Café)讨论沙池(Sandpit)提出一套研究优先事项;通过德尔菲咨询(Delphi Consultation)在六个月内分发三份调查问卷,以制定最佳实践指南。这两个阶段的专家小组由生活经验、政策、实践和研究方面的专家组成。研究结果《真实而有意义地参与遗产或相关活动(AMPHORA)指南》涵盖三个阶段:项目开发、项目实施和项目后续行动,每个阶段都有一套行动要点。社会影响AMPHORA 指导方针可以帮助所有组织实施安全的项目,以支持参与人员的心理健康,并加强和保护历史环境。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一份以研究为主导的指导方针,帮助遗产组织支持那些有心理健康问题的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Understanding gender-responsive needs of girls in the Children and Young People Secure Estate (CYPSE): menstrual cycle considerations Editorial: The British and Irish group for the study of personality disorder: reflections on the 23rd annual conference The “Team Tree” Professional Tree of Life intervention: development and evaluation within the acute inpatient psychiatric setting Systematicity of receiving mental health care predicts better subjective well-being of Ukrainians during the second year of the Russian invasion Comparing service user perspectives of an early intervention in psychosis service before and during COVID-19 lockdowns: a service evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1