Development beyond 2030: more collaboration, less competition?

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES International Development Planning Review Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.3828/idpr.2024.4
Ankit Kumar, Stephanie Butcher, Daniel Hammett, Sandra Barragan-Contreras, Vanessa Burns, Ollie Chesworth, Gregory Cooper, Juan Miguel Kanai, Hannah Mottram, Sammia Poveda, Pamela Richardson
{"title":"Development beyond 2030: more collaboration, less competition?","authors":"Ankit Kumar, Stephanie Butcher, Daniel Hammett, Sandra Barragan-Contreras, Vanessa Burns, Ollie Chesworth, Gregory Cooper, Juan Miguel Kanai, Hannah Mottram, Sammia Poveda, Pamela Richardson","doi":"10.3828/idpr.2024.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) represented a key landmark in collaboration and shared agenda-setting to address global challenges across scales and geographies. However, despite initial optimism that measurable goals would support accountability and transparency in development, progress towards realising goals has been mixed. Global development agendas increasingly face challenges from the intensification of climate change, the return of populism and ethnonationalism, and a deepening of inequalities at intra- and inter-national scales.\n This article interrogates the priorities that must inform a critical post-SDG development agenda. To think towards this, we first explore three questions of the development agenda: 1) can development be sustainable? 2) Can development be delivered through markets? And 3) can development be ‘global’? To address these tensions and take a first step towards a more critical post-2030 agenda, we call for a focus on spatialities, multiplicities and historicities of development.","PeriodicalId":46625,"journal":{"name":"International Development Planning Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Development Planning Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2024.4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) represented a key landmark in collaboration and shared agenda-setting to address global challenges across scales and geographies. However, despite initial optimism that measurable goals would support accountability and transparency in development, progress towards realising goals has been mixed. Global development agendas increasingly face challenges from the intensification of climate change, the return of populism and ethnonationalism, and a deepening of inequalities at intra- and inter-national scales. This article interrogates the priorities that must inform a critical post-SDG development agenda. To think towards this, we first explore three questions of the development agenda: 1) can development be sustainable? 2) Can development be delivered through markets? And 3) can development be ‘global’? To address these tensions and take a first step towards a more critical post-2030 agenda, we call for a focus on spatialities, multiplicities and historicities of development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2030 年后的发展:多合作,少竞争?
可持续发展目标(SDGs)是为应对不同规模和地域的全球挑战而开展合作和制定共同议程的重要里程碑。然而,尽管最初人们乐观地认为可衡量的目标将支持发展的问责制和透明度,但在实现目标方面的进展却喜忧参半。全球发展议程日益面临气候变化加剧、民粹主义和民族主义卷土重来以及国内和国家间不平等加剧等挑战。本文探讨了后可持续发展目标发展议程必须考虑的优先事项。为此,我们首先探讨了发展议程的三个问题:1) 发展能否可持续?2) 能否通过市场实现发展?3)发展可以是 "全球性 "的吗?为了解决这些矛盾,并向更具批判性的 2030 年后议程迈出第一步,我们呼吁关注发展的空间性、多重性和历史性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: International Development Planning Review’s editorial policy is to reflect international development planning policy and practice. This includes a focus on the physical, economic and social conditions of urban and rural populations. The journal explores current national and international policy agendas, achievements and strategies in this area, offering material of interest to its established academic and professional readership as well as to a broader critical audience.
期刊最新文献
The politics of Africa’s urban–industrialisation: authoritarian centralisation and policy integration Picture this! Vulnerable women’s perspectives on SDGs prioritisation The geography of women’s informal entrepreneurial activities in urban Zambia: place, mobility and locational decision-making Community perception of climate events as a security issue: the case of Hatiya Island, Bangladesh Development beyond 2030: more collaboration, less competition?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1