Post-acute day and night non-invasive respiratory intervention use and outcome: A brief report.

IF 0.8 Q4 PEDIATRICS Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.3233/PRM-220094
J. O’Brien, Helene M Dumas, M. L. Hughes, Brittany Ryan, V. Kharasch
{"title":"Post-acute day and night non-invasive respiratory intervention use and outcome: A brief report.","authors":"J. O’Brien, Helene M Dumas, M. L. Hughes, Brittany Ryan, V. Kharasch","doi":"10.3233/PRM-220094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nThis study aimed to describe daytime and nighttime use and outcome of non-invasive respiratory intervention (NIRI) for infants born prematurely and for children with medical complexity (CMC) during a post-acute care hospital (PACH) admission.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThirty-eight initial PACH admissions (October 2018 through September 2020) for premature infants (< 1 year; n = 19) and CMC (> 1 year; n = 19) requiring NIRI during the day and/or at night were retrospectively examined. Measures included: 1) daytime and nighttime NIRI use by type (supplemental oxygen therapy via low-flow nasal cannula or positive airway pressure [PAP] via high-flow nasal cannula, continuous positive airway pressure, or biphasic positive airway pressure at admission and discharge) and 2) daytime and nighttime NIRI outcome reduction, increase, or no change from admission to discharge.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFor the total sample (n = 38), daytime vs nighttime NIRI use was significantly different (p < 0.001). At both admission and discharge, supplemental oxygen was the most common NIRI during the day, while PAP was most common at night. From admission to discharge, seven (18%) infants and children had a positive change (reduced NIRI) during the day, while nine (24%) had a positive change at night. At discharge, 11/38 (29%) infants and children required no daytime NIRI, while 4/38 (11%) required no day or night NIRI.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nNIRI use differs between day and night at PACH admission and discharge for CMC. Reductions in NIRI were achieved during the day and at night from PACH admission to discharge for both infants born prematurely and for children with varied congenital, neurological, or cardiac diagnoses.","PeriodicalId":16692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-220094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE This study aimed to describe daytime and nighttime use and outcome of non-invasive respiratory intervention (NIRI) for infants born prematurely and for children with medical complexity (CMC) during a post-acute care hospital (PACH) admission. METHODS Thirty-eight initial PACH admissions (October 2018 through September 2020) for premature infants (< 1 year; n = 19) and CMC (> 1 year; n = 19) requiring NIRI during the day and/or at night were retrospectively examined. Measures included: 1) daytime and nighttime NIRI use by type (supplemental oxygen therapy via low-flow nasal cannula or positive airway pressure [PAP] via high-flow nasal cannula, continuous positive airway pressure, or biphasic positive airway pressure at admission and discharge) and 2) daytime and nighttime NIRI outcome reduction, increase, or no change from admission to discharge. RESULTS For the total sample (n = 38), daytime vs nighttime NIRI use was significantly different (p < 0.001). At both admission and discharge, supplemental oxygen was the most common NIRI during the day, while PAP was most common at night. From admission to discharge, seven (18%) infants and children had a positive change (reduced NIRI) during the day, while nine (24%) had a positive change at night. At discharge, 11/38 (29%) infants and children required no daytime NIRI, while 4/38 (11%) required no day or night NIRI. CONCLUSION NIRI use differs between day and night at PACH admission and discharge for CMC. Reductions in NIRI were achieved during the day and at night from PACH admission to discharge for both infants born prematurely and for children with varied congenital, neurological, or cardiac diagnoses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性期后昼夜无创呼吸干预的使用和结果:简要报告。
目的本研究旨在描述早产儿和内科复杂性儿童(CMC)在入住后护理医院(PACH)期间白天和夜间使用无创呼吸干预(NIRI)的情况和结果。方法回顾性研究了38例首次入住PACH的早产儿(1岁;n = 19)(2018年10月至2020年9月),这些早产儿在白天和/或夜间需要NIRI。衡量标准包括1)按类型划分的白天和夜间 NIRI 使用情况(入院和出院时通过低流量鼻插管补充氧气治疗或通过高流量鼻插管、持续气道正压或双相气道正压进行气道正压 [PAP]);2)从入院到出院,白天和夜间 NIRI 结果减少、增加或无变化。结果对于总样本(n = 38),白天与夜间 NIRI 使用情况存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。在入院和出院时,补充氧气是白天最常用的近红外设备,而呼吸机则是夜间最常用的近红外设备。从入院到出院,7 名婴儿和儿童(18%)在白天出现了积极变化(非近红外指标降低),9 名婴儿和儿童(24%)在夜间出现了积极变化。出院时,11/38(29%)名婴儿和儿童白天不需要近红外照射,4/38(11%)名婴儿和儿童白天或夜间不需要近红外照射。无论是早产儿还是患有各种先天性、神经或心脏疾病的儿童,从入院到出院期间,白天和夜间的 NIRI 均有所减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
139
期刊最新文献
Caregiver and student perspectives on school services for students with traumatic brain injury during the COVID-19 pandemic. Review of Appetite for Risk-What it is, Who has it and How I survived, by Robert R. Abbott. Analysis of a newly developed multidisciplinary program in the Middle East informed by the recently revised spina bifida guidelines. Effectiveness of virtual reality training compared to balance-specific training and conventional training on balance and gross motor functions of children with cerebral palsy: A double blinded randomized controlled trial. "Virtual reality fixed me": A case report of the use of virtual reality during intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1