Lipoprotein(a) as a blood marker for large artery atherosclerosis stroke etiology: validation in a prospective cohort from a swiss stroke center.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Swiss medical weekly Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.57187/s.3633
Salome Rudin, L. Kriemler, Tolga D. Dittrich, Annaelle Zietz, J. Schweizer, M. Arnold, Nils Peters, Filip Barinka, Simon Jung, Marcel Arnold, Urs Fischer, Katharina Rentsch, M. Christ-Crain, Mira Katan, G. D. De Marchis
{"title":"Lipoprotein(a) as a blood marker for large artery atherosclerosis stroke etiology: validation in a prospective cohort from a swiss stroke center.","authors":"Salome Rudin, L. Kriemler, Tolga D. Dittrich, Annaelle Zietz, J. Schweizer, M. Arnold, Nils Peters, Filip Barinka, Simon Jung, Marcel Arnold, Urs Fischer, Katharina Rentsch, M. Christ-Crain, Mira Katan, G. D. De Marchis","doi":"10.57187/s.3633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nLipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] serum levels are highly genetically determined and promote atherogenesis. High Lp(a) levels are associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity. Serum Lp(a) levels have recently been associated with large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) stroke. We aimed to externally validate this association in an independent cohort.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis study stems from the prospective multicentre CoRisk study (CoPeptin for Risk Stratification in Acute Stroke patients [NCT00878813]), conducted at the University Hospital Bern, Switzerland, between 2009 and 2011, in which Lp(a) plasma levels were measured within the first 24 hours after stroke onset. We assessed the association of Lp(a) with LAA stroke using multivariable logistic regression and performed interaction analyses to identify potential effect modifiers.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf 743 patients with ischaemic stroke, 105 (14%) had LAA stroke aetiology. Lp(a) levels were higher for LAA stroke than non-LAA stroke patients (23.0 nmol/l vs 16.3 nmol/l, p = 0.01). Multivariable regression revealed an independent association of log10and#xA0;Lp(a) with LAA stroke aetiology (aOR 1.47 [95% CI 1.03and#x2013;2.09], p = 0.03). The interaction analyses showed that Lp(a) was not associated with LAA stroke aetiology among patients with diabetes.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIn a well-characterised cohort of patients with ischaemic stroke, we validated the association of higher Lp(a) levels with LAA stroke aetiology, independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. These findings may inform randomised clinical trials investigating the effect of Lp(a) lowering agents on cardiovascular outcomes. The CoRisk (CoPeptin for Risk Stratification in Acute Patients) study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.\n\n\nREGISTRATION NUMBER\nNCT00878813.","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/s.3633","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] serum levels are highly genetically determined and promote atherogenesis. High Lp(a) levels are associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity. Serum Lp(a) levels have recently been associated with large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) stroke. We aimed to externally validate this association in an independent cohort. METHODS This study stems from the prospective multicentre CoRisk study (CoPeptin for Risk Stratification in Acute Stroke patients [NCT00878813]), conducted at the University Hospital Bern, Switzerland, between 2009 and 2011, in which Lp(a) plasma levels were measured within the first 24 hours after stroke onset. We assessed the association of Lp(a) with LAA stroke using multivariable logistic regression and performed interaction analyses to identify potential effect modifiers. RESULTS Of 743 patients with ischaemic stroke, 105 (14%) had LAA stroke aetiology. Lp(a) levels were higher for LAA stroke than non-LAA stroke patients (23.0 nmol/l vs 16.3 nmol/l, p = 0.01). Multivariable regression revealed an independent association of log10and#xA0;Lp(a) with LAA stroke aetiology (aOR 1.47 [95% CI 1.03and#x2013;2.09], p = 0.03). The interaction analyses showed that Lp(a) was not associated with LAA stroke aetiology among patients with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS In a well-characterised cohort of patients with ischaemic stroke, we validated the association of higher Lp(a) levels with LAA stroke aetiology, independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. These findings may inform randomised clinical trials investigating the effect of Lp(a) lowering agents on cardiovascular outcomes. The CoRisk (CoPeptin for Risk Stratification in Acute Patients) study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT00878813.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脂蛋白(a)作为大动脉粥样硬化中风病因的血液标志物:在瑞士中风中心前瞻性队列中的验证。
背景脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]血清水平由遗传因素高度决定,并促进动脉粥样硬化的发生。高脂蛋白(a)水平与心血管发病率增加有关。最近,血清脂蛋白(a)水平与大动脉粥样硬化(LAA)中风有关。本研究源于瑞士伯尔尼大学医院于 2009 年至 2011 年期间开展的前瞻性多中心 CoRisk 研究(CoPeptin for Risk Stratification in Acute Stroke patients [NCT00878813]),该研究在中风发病后 24 小时内测量血浆脂蛋白(a)水平。我们使用多变量逻辑回归评估了脂蛋白(a)与 LAA 中风的关系,并进行了交互分析以确定潜在的效应调节因子。结果 在 743 例缺血性中风患者中,105 例(14%)具有 LAA 中风病因。LAA 中风患者的脂蛋白(a)水平高于非 LAA 中风患者(23.0 nmol/l vs 16.3 nmol/l,p = 0.01)。多变量回归显示 log10 和#xA0;Lp(a)与 LAA 中风病因有独立关联(aOR 1.47 [95% CI 1.03 和#x2013;2.09],p = 0.03)。结论 在缺血性卒中患者队列中,我们验证了 Lp(a) 水平较高与 LAA 卒中病因的相关性,与传统的心血管风险因素无关。这些发现可为研究降低脂蛋白(a)药物对心血管预后影响的随机临床试验提供参考。CoRisk(用于急性期患者风险分层的CoPeptin)研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov.REGISTRATION NUMBERNCT00878813上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Swiss medical weekly
Swiss medical weekly 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.
期刊最新文献
Inpatient opioid prescribing patterns and their effect on rehospitalisations: a nested case-control study using data from a Swiss public acute hospital. It has been 30 years since the first alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy was performed. Shake-up in the world of assessment: Impressions from the Ottawa Conference on Assessment from Down Under. Dispensed drugs during pregnancy in outpatient care between 2015 and 2021 in Switzerland: a retrospective analysis of Swiss healthcare claims data. Commentary to the controversy: Should asleep deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease be preferred over the awake approach?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1