Comparison of lipopolysaccharide-mediated peripheral blood mononuclear cell activation between Brahman and Brahman x Thai native crossbreed cattle

Piyarat Srinontong, W. Aengwanich, Sattabongkod Somphon, Siriyakorn Khonwai, Thanasorn Nitsinsaku, Zhiliang Wu, T. Chalalai, B. Saraphol, Wilasinee Srisanyong
{"title":"Comparison of lipopolysaccharide-mediated peripheral blood mononuclear cell activation between Brahman and Brahman x Thai native crossbreed cattle","authors":"Piyarat Srinontong, W. Aengwanich, Sattabongkod Somphon, Siriyakorn Khonwai, Thanasorn Nitsinsaku, Zhiliang Wu, T. Chalalai, B. Saraphol, Wilasinee Srisanyong","doi":"10.14202/vetworld.2024.804-810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a robust endotoxin known to activate the immune system in cattle. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of LPS on the morphology, cell viability, malondialdehyde (MDA), nitric oxide (NO), and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in Brahman and Brahman x Thai native crossbreed cattle.\n\nMaterials and Methods: PBMCs were isolated from Brahman and Brahman x Thai native crossbreed cattle and treated with 0, 0.1, 1, and 10 μg/mL Escherichia coli LPS, respectively. Morphological changes in PBMCs were assessed at 24 and 48 h. In addition, we measured PBMC cell viability, MDA, NO, and TAC.\n\nResults: LPS stimulation caused cell deformation and partial PBMC area enlargement, but there were no differences between Brahman and Brahman x Thai native crossbreed cattle. Stimulation at all levels did not affect the viability of PBMCs (p > 0.05). MDA and NO levels were significantly higher in Brahman cattle than in Brahman Thai native crossbred cattle (p < 0.05). TAC was significantly higher in Brahman x Thai native crossbred cattle than in Brahman cattle (p < 0.05).\n\nConclusion: Immune cells of crossbreed cattle have a higher activation response to LPS than those of purebred cattle, and native crossbreed beef cattle have a higher antioxidant capacity than purebred beef cattle. This result may explain why hybrid cattle of indigenous breeds are more resistant to disease than purebred cattle.\n\nKeywords: Brahman cattle, lipopolysaccharide, oxidative stress, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, Thai native crossbreed cattle.","PeriodicalId":506834,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary World","volume":"69 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2024.804-810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim: Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a robust endotoxin known to activate the immune system in cattle. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of LPS on the morphology, cell viability, malondialdehyde (MDA), nitric oxide (NO), and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in Brahman and Brahman x Thai native crossbreed cattle. Materials and Methods: PBMCs were isolated from Brahman and Brahman x Thai native crossbreed cattle and treated with 0, 0.1, 1, and 10 μg/mL Escherichia coli LPS, respectively. Morphological changes in PBMCs were assessed at 24 and 48 h. In addition, we measured PBMC cell viability, MDA, NO, and TAC. Results: LPS stimulation caused cell deformation and partial PBMC area enlargement, but there were no differences between Brahman and Brahman x Thai native crossbreed cattle. Stimulation at all levels did not affect the viability of PBMCs (p > 0.05). MDA and NO levels were significantly higher in Brahman cattle than in Brahman Thai native crossbred cattle (p < 0.05). TAC was significantly higher in Brahman x Thai native crossbred cattle than in Brahman cattle (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Immune cells of crossbreed cattle have a higher activation response to LPS than those of purebred cattle, and native crossbreed beef cattle have a higher antioxidant capacity than purebred beef cattle. This result may explain why hybrid cattle of indigenous breeds are more resistant to disease than purebred cattle. Keywords: Brahman cattle, lipopolysaccharide, oxidative stress, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, Thai native crossbreed cattle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较婆罗门牛与婆罗门牛 x 泰国本地杂交牛之间脂多糖介导的外周血单核细胞活化情况
背景和目的:脂多糖(LPS)是一种强效内毒素,可激活牛的免疫系统。本研究的目的是调查 LPS 对婆罗门牛和婆罗门×泰国本土杂交牛外周血单核细胞(PBMC)的形态、细胞活力、丙二醛(MDA)、一氧化氮(NO)和总抗氧化能力(TAC)的影响:分别用 0、0.1、1 和 10 μg/mL 的大肠杆菌 LPS 处理婆罗门牛和婆罗门×泰国本土杂交牛的外周血单核细胞。此外,我们还测定了 PBMC 细胞活力、MDA、NO 和 TAC:结果:LPS 刺激会导致细胞变形和部分 PBMC 面积增大,但在婆罗门牛和婆罗门×泰国本土杂交牛之间没有差异。所有水平的刺激都不会影响 PBMC 的活力(p > 0.05)。布拉赫曼牛的 MDA 和 NO 水平明显高于布拉赫曼泰国本土杂交牛(p < 0.05)。布拉曼牛 x 泰国本土杂交牛的 TAC 明显高于布拉曼牛(P < 0.05):结论:杂交牛的免疫细胞对 LPS 的活化反应高于纯种牛,本地杂交肉牛的抗氧化能力高于纯种肉牛。这一结果可能解释了为什么本土品种的杂交牛比纯种牛更抗病:婆罗门牛 脂多糖 氧化应激 外周血单核细胞 泰国本土杂交牛
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. infection in rodents and chickens in Franceville, Gabon Changes in the metabolomic profiles of mammary secretion in relation to dam litter size and parity number in Black Bengal goats Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and practices on vaccine usage among small ruminant farmers in the Northern Region of Bangladesh Potential distribution of malaria vectors in Central Vietnam: A MaxEnt modeling approach Raising double-muscled breed cattle and their crossbreds in the tropics: insight from growth models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1