Improved tidal estimates from short water level records via the modified harmonic analysis model

IF 3.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Ocean Modelling Pub Date : 2024-04-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ocemod.2024.102372
Haidong Pan , Tengfei Xu , Zexun Wei
{"title":"Improved tidal estimates from short water level records via the modified harmonic analysis model","authors":"Haidong Pan ,&nbsp;Tengfei Xu ,&nbsp;Zexun Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.ocemod.2024.102372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To fully resolve eight major tides from short-term records, classical harmonic analysis model usually infers unresolved constituents with the help of inference relationships from nearby long-term tide gauges. Our previous study developed a modified harmonic analysis model using the credo of smoothness (i.e., MHACS) which can achieve this without inference relationships. Via introducing the inherent natural links between major tides, MHACS breaks the restrictions of the Rayleigh criterion and requires only ∼9-day hourly records to resolve eight major tides. However, when data length is shorter than 9 days, the results of MHACS become problematic due to over-fitting. In this study, we introduce ridge regression to replace ordinary least squares (OLS) in the MHACS. Practical experiments on short-term hourly tide gauge records and satellite altimeter observations indicate that ridge regression can effectively eliminate meaningless mathematical artifacts obtained by OLS. The minimum length of records for MHACS to resolve eight major tides dramatically decreases from ∼210 h to ∼75 h as a result of using ridge regression. It is also found that ridge regression can notably reduce the uncertainties of tidal estimates from MHACS. Moreover, other modified harmonic analysis models such as NS_TIDE designed for river tides also suffer from over-fitting which can be solved by ridge regression in a similar way.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19457,"journal":{"name":"Ocean Modelling","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 102372"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1463500324000593","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To fully resolve eight major tides from short-term records, classical harmonic analysis model usually infers unresolved constituents with the help of inference relationships from nearby long-term tide gauges. Our previous study developed a modified harmonic analysis model using the credo of smoothness (i.e., MHACS) which can achieve this without inference relationships. Via introducing the inherent natural links between major tides, MHACS breaks the restrictions of the Rayleigh criterion and requires only ∼9-day hourly records to resolve eight major tides. However, when data length is shorter than 9 days, the results of MHACS become problematic due to over-fitting. In this study, we introduce ridge regression to replace ordinary least squares (OLS) in the MHACS. Practical experiments on short-term hourly tide gauge records and satellite altimeter observations indicate that ridge regression can effectively eliminate meaningless mathematical artifacts obtained by OLS. The minimum length of records for MHACS to resolve eight major tides dramatically decreases from ∼210 h to ∼75 h as a result of using ridge regression. It is also found that ridge regression can notably reduce the uncertainties of tidal estimates from MHACS. Moreover, other modified harmonic analysis models such as NS_TIDE designed for river tides also suffer from over-fitting which can be solved by ridge regression in a similar way.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过修改后的谐波分析模型从短水位记录中改进潮汐估算
为了从短期记录中完全解析八大潮汐,经典的谐波分析模型通常借助附近长期验潮仪的推断关系来推断未解析的成分。我们之前的研究利用平滑信条开发了一种改进的谐波分析模型(即 MHACS),无需推断关系即可实现这一目标。通过引入主要潮汐之间固有的自然联系,MHACS 打破了雷利准则的限制,只需要 9 天~9 天的每小时记录就能解析 8 个主要潮汐。然而,当数据长度短于 9 天时,MHACS 的结果会因过度拟合而出现问题。在本研究中,我们在 MHACS 中引入了脊回归来替代普通最小二乘法(OLS)。对短期每小时验潮仪记录和卫星高度计观测数据的实际实验表明,脊回归能有效消除 OLS 得到的无意义数学假象。使用脊回归后,MHACS 分辨八个主要潮汐的最小记录长度从 ∼ 210 小时大幅减少到 ∼ 75 小时。研究还发现,脊回归可以显著降低 MHACS 对潮汐估算的不确定性。此外,为河流潮汐设计的其他修正谐波分析模型(如 NS_TIDE)也存在过拟合问题,也可以用类似的方法通过脊回归来解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean Modelling
Ocean Modelling 地学-海洋学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
19.6 weeks
期刊介绍: The main objective of Ocean Modelling is to provide rapid communication between those interested in ocean modelling, whether through direct observation, or through analytical, numerical or laboratory models, and including interactions between physical and biogeochemical or biological phenomena. Because of the intimate links between ocean and atmosphere, involvement of scientists interested in influences of either medium on the other is welcome. The journal has a wide scope and includes ocean-atmosphere interaction in various forms as well as pure ocean results. In addition to primary peer-reviewed papers, the journal provides review papers, preliminary communications, and discussions.
期刊最新文献
Low power computation of transoceanic wave propagation for tsunami hazard mitigation Discrete variance decay analysis of spurious mixing Global tsunami modelling on a spherical multiple-cell grid Accuracy assessment of recent global ocean tide models in coastal waters of the European North West Shelf Enhancing model temperature estimations in shallow, turbid, coastal regions: Mobile Bay, Alabama
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1