Navigated pedicle screw insertion with the Surgivisio system: Malposition rate and risk factors – about 648 screws

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-25 DOI:10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103899
Maxime Saad , Jérôme Tonetti , Gaël Kerschbaumer , Mehdi Boudissa
{"title":"Navigated pedicle screw insertion with the Surgivisio system: Malposition rate and risk factors – about 648 screws","authors":"Maxime Saad ,&nbsp;Jérôme Tonetti ,&nbsp;Gaël Kerschbaumer ,&nbsp;Mehdi Boudissa","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Pedicle screw malposition rates vary greatly in scientific literature depending on the chosen criteria. Different techniques have been developed to lower the risk of screw malposition. Our primary objective is to evaluate the malposition rate associated with the use of the Surgivisio navigation system and to identify risk factors for screw malposition. The secondary objectives are to assess operating time and radiation data.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div><span>We performed a monocentric retrospective consecutive case series. All patients operated for pedicle screw implantation using the Surgivisio system between September 2017 and June 2020 were included. Screw positioning was evaluated on postoperative CT scans using Heary and Gertzbein classifications. Thirteen potential risk factors for screw malposition were hypothesized and tested with a univariate and </span>multivariate analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Six hundred and forty-eight screws could be evaluated in 97 patients. Our study reported a 92.4% satisfactory screw implantation rate with a mean operative time per screw of 14.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->6.7<!--> <!-->minutes and a patient effective dose of 0.47<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.31 mSv per screw. One screw was neurotoxic and required an early revision (0.15%). Three risk factors for screw malposition have been identified in a multivariate analysis: female gender (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.13 [1.11; 4], <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0219), an implantation level above D10 (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.17 [1.13; 4.16], <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0197), and an “open” surgery (as opposed to percutaneous) (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->3.47 [1.83; 6.56], <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pedicle screw malposition rate and operative time with the Surgivisio navigation system are comparable with those reported in scientific literature. We theorized that intraoperative patient reference displacement could be a major cause of navigation failure.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":"111 3","pages":"Article 103899"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877056824001385","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Pedicle screw malposition rates vary greatly in scientific literature depending on the chosen criteria. Different techniques have been developed to lower the risk of screw malposition. Our primary objective is to evaluate the malposition rate associated with the use of the Surgivisio navigation system and to identify risk factors for screw malposition. The secondary objectives are to assess operating time and radiation data.

Materials and methods

We performed a monocentric retrospective consecutive case series. All patients operated for pedicle screw implantation using the Surgivisio system between September 2017 and June 2020 were included. Screw positioning was evaluated on postoperative CT scans using Heary and Gertzbein classifications. Thirteen potential risk factors for screw malposition were hypothesized and tested with a univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results

Six hundred and forty-eight screws could be evaluated in 97 patients. Our study reported a 92.4% satisfactory screw implantation rate with a mean operative time per screw of 14.5 ± 6.7 minutes and a patient effective dose of 0.47 ± 0.31 mSv per screw. One screw was neurotoxic and required an early revision (0.15%). Three risk factors for screw malposition have been identified in a multivariate analysis: female gender (OR = 2.13 [1.11; 4], p = 0.0219), an implantation level above D10 (OR = 2.17 [1.13; 4.16], p = 0.0197), and an “open” surgery (as opposed to percutaneous) (OR = 3.47 [1.83; 6.56], p = 0.0002).

Conclusion

Pedicle screw malposition rate and operative time with the Surgivisio navigation system are comparable with those reported in scientific literature. We theorized that intraoperative patient reference displacement could be a major cause of navigation failure.

Level of evidence

IV.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 Surgivisio 系统导航插入椎弓根螺钉:错位率和风险因素 - 约 648 枚螺钉
目的根据所选标准的不同,科学文献中椎弓根螺钉错位率差异很大。已经开发了不同的技术来降低螺钉错位的风险。我们的主要目的是评估与使用Surgivisio导航系统相关的错位率,并确定螺钉错位的危险因素。次要目标是评估操作时间和辐射数据。材料和方法我们进行了单中心回顾性连续病例系列研究。纳入2017年9月至2020年6月期间使用Surgivisio系统进行椎弓根螺钉植入手术的所有患者。术后CT扫描采用Heary和Gertzbein分类评估螺钉定位。我们假设了13种可能导致螺钉错位的危险因素,并通过单因素和多因素分析进行了检验。结果97例患者可评估648枚螺钉。我们的研究报告了92.4%的满意螺钉植入率,平均每根螺钉的手术时间为14.5±6.7分钟,每根螺钉的有效剂量为0.47±0.31 mSv。1颗螺钉有神经毒性,需要早期翻修(0.15%)。在多变量分析中发现了螺钉错位的三个危险因素:女性(OR = 2.13 [1.11;4], p = 0.0219),植入水平在D10以上(OR = 2.17 [1.13;4.16], p = 0.0197)和“开放式”手术(相对于经皮手术)(OR = 3.47 [1.83;6.56], p = 0.0002)。结论在Surgivisio导航系统下,椎弓根螺钉错位率和手术时间与文献报道相当。我们推测术中患者参考移位可能是导致导航失败的主要原因。证据水平:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
期刊最新文献
Current status of early diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip more than 10 years after program implementation: A multicenter study of cases diagnosed in 2023. Revising short-stem THA with either a new short stem or a primary stems: A feasible and durable strategy. Gilles Walch and the French School Heritage: Who kills the Biceps when repairing a distal isolated supraspinatus tear? An international survey from the SFA biceps study group. Intra-articular alignment after distal femoral osteotomy: A multicenter analysis of intra-articular changes. Relationship between the Hounsfield Unit value of the greater trochanter and the risk of greater trochanteric fractures in anterolateral muscle-sparing minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1