A Comparison of Post-Operative Patient Reported Outcome Measurements Following Bunion Surgery: Modified Lapidus vs Minimally Invasive Techniques

BScMed Madeline Bhend, BS Chase Gauthier, MD Tyler Gonzalez, M. J. B. Md
{"title":"A Comparison of Post-Operative Patient Reported Outcome Measurements Following Bunion Surgery: Modified Lapidus vs Minimally Invasive Techniques","authors":"BScMed Madeline Bhend, BS Chase Gauthier, MD Tyler Gonzalez, M. J. B. Md","doi":"10.1177/2473011424S00042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction/Purpose: The modified Lapidus procedure (MLP) or a minimally invasive surgery distal transverse osteotomy (MISDTO) are acceptable surgical treatment options for hallux valgus. The current literature is evolving when comparing the effects of each procedure on patient reported outcomes and post-operative complications. The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes, time to weight bear, and patient reported outcomes using the Patient Reported Outcome Instrumentation System (PROMIS) for the MLP and MISDTO. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a MLP or MISDTO for hallux valgus correction at Prisma Health Midlands between February 2020 – February 2022. Data collected included: demographic data, postoperative outcomes, time to weight bear, and PROMIS scores, including Pain Interference (PI), Physical Function (PF), and Mobility scores. Paired Student’s T-Test and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test were used to compare continuous variables and Chi-Squared test for categorical variables. Results: A total of 81 patients undergoing MLP and 78 undergoing MISDTO were included in the study. Average follow-up for MLP and MISDTO patients was 53.7 and 43.4 weeks, respectively. MLP demonstrated significant improvement in PI (52.5 vs 56.8, P< 0.001) and Mobility (46.3 vs 43.4, P=0.044) scores, while MISDTO demonstrated a significant improvement in PI (48.8 vs 57.1, P< 0.001), PF (50.2 vs 44.9, P< 0.001), and Mobility (49 vs 42.8, P< 0.001) scores. MISDTO patients had significantly larger improvements in PI (7.6 vs 4.5, P=0.008), PF (5.3 vs 2.2, P=0.026), and Mobility (5.5 vs 2.9, P=0.02) compared to MLP patients. MISDTO patients had a significantly lower non-union rate (13.6% vs 2.6%, P=0.025), hardware failure rate (0% vs 9.9%, P=0.007), and time to weight-bear (2.2 vs 7.8 weeks, P< 0.001). Conclusion: Both MLP and MISDTO procedures are effective treatments for improving the pain and mobility issues associated with hallux valgus while maintaining patients’ function. MISDTO was found to improve patient reported outcomes significantly more than MLP, with a lower non-union rate, lower hardware failure rate, and shorter time to weight-bear. These findings suggest MISDTO is superior to MLP in improving patient reported outcomes and postoperative outcomes in the treatment of hallux valgus. Further study multicenter and long term outcome studies could be useful further evaluate these short term findings.","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"162 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011424S00042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/Purpose: The modified Lapidus procedure (MLP) or a minimally invasive surgery distal transverse osteotomy (MISDTO) are acceptable surgical treatment options for hallux valgus. The current literature is evolving when comparing the effects of each procedure on patient reported outcomes and post-operative complications. The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes, time to weight bear, and patient reported outcomes using the Patient Reported Outcome Instrumentation System (PROMIS) for the MLP and MISDTO. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a MLP or MISDTO for hallux valgus correction at Prisma Health Midlands between February 2020 – February 2022. Data collected included: demographic data, postoperative outcomes, time to weight bear, and PROMIS scores, including Pain Interference (PI), Physical Function (PF), and Mobility scores. Paired Student’s T-Test and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test were used to compare continuous variables and Chi-Squared test for categorical variables. Results: A total of 81 patients undergoing MLP and 78 undergoing MISDTO were included in the study. Average follow-up for MLP and MISDTO patients was 53.7 and 43.4 weeks, respectively. MLP demonstrated significant improvement in PI (52.5 vs 56.8, P< 0.001) and Mobility (46.3 vs 43.4, P=0.044) scores, while MISDTO demonstrated a significant improvement in PI (48.8 vs 57.1, P< 0.001), PF (50.2 vs 44.9, P< 0.001), and Mobility (49 vs 42.8, P< 0.001) scores. MISDTO patients had significantly larger improvements in PI (7.6 vs 4.5, P=0.008), PF (5.3 vs 2.2, P=0.026), and Mobility (5.5 vs 2.9, P=0.02) compared to MLP patients. MISDTO patients had a significantly lower non-union rate (13.6% vs 2.6%, P=0.025), hardware failure rate (0% vs 9.9%, P=0.007), and time to weight-bear (2.2 vs 7.8 weeks, P< 0.001). Conclusion: Both MLP and MISDTO procedures are effective treatments for improving the pain and mobility issues associated with hallux valgus while maintaining patients’ function. MISDTO was found to improve patient reported outcomes significantly more than MLP, with a lower non-union rate, lower hardware failure rate, and shorter time to weight-bear. These findings suggest MISDTO is superior to MLP in improving patient reported outcomes and postoperative outcomes in the treatment of hallux valgus. Further study multicenter and long term outcome studies could be useful further evaluate these short term findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拇趾外翻手术后患者报告结果的比较:改良 Lapidus 与微创技术
导言/目的:改良Lapidus手术(MLP)或微创手术远端横向截骨术(MISDTO)是可以接受的治疗外翻的手术方法。在比较每种手术对患者报告结果和术后并发症的影响时,目前的文献还在不断发展。本研究的目的是使用患者报告结果工具系统(PROMIS)比较MLP和MISDTO的术后效果、负重时间和患者报告结果。方法:本研究回顾性分析了2020年2月至2022年2月期间在Prisma Health Midlands接受MLP或MISDTO矫正外翻的患者。收集的数据包括:人口统计学数据、术后结果、负重时间和PROMIS评分,包括疼痛干扰(PI)、身体功能(PF)和活动能力评分。对连续变量采用配对学生 T 检验和 Wilcoxon 秩和检验,对分类变量采用 Chi-Squared 检验。结果共有81名患者接受了MLP治疗,78名患者接受了MISDTO治疗。MLP 和 MISDTO 患者的平均随访时间分别为 53.7 周和 43.4 周。MLP显示PI(52.5 vs 56.8,P< 0.001)和Mobility(46.3 vs 43.4,P=0.044)评分有明显改善,而MISDTO显示PI(48.8 vs 57.1,P< 0.001)、PF(50.2 vs 44.9,P< 0.001)和Mobility(49 vs 42.8,P< 0.001)评分有明显改善。与MLP患者相比,MISDTO患者在PI(7.6 vs 4.5,P=0.008)、PF(5.3 vs 2.2,P=0.026)和活动能力(5.5 vs 2.9,P=0.02)方面的改善幅度明显更大。MISDTO患者的未愈合率(13.6% vs 2.6%,P=0.025)、硬件失败率(0% vs 9.9%,P=0.007)和负重时间(2.2 vs 7.8周,P< 0.001)均明显低于MLP患者。结论:MLP和MISDTO手术都是有效的治疗方法,可改善与足外翻相关的疼痛和活动问题,同时保持患者的功能。研究发现,MISDTO比MLP更能改善患者报告的结果,其非愈合率更低,硬件故障率更低,负重时间更短。这些研究结果表明,MISDTO 在改善患者报告结果和治疗外翻的术后效果方面优于 MLP。进一步的多中心研究和长期疗效研究将有助于进一步评估这些短期研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1152
期刊最新文献
Changes in Tarsal Tunnel Volume and Pressure After Minimally Invasive Lateral Sliding Calcaneal Osteotomy: A Cadaveric Study. Peroneal Tendon Dislocation With Talus Fracture and Subtalar Joint Dislocation: A Case Report. Temporary Transarticular Screw Fixation for Traumatic Peritalar Instability After Talar Fracture-Dislocation. Percutaneous Repair in Patients Aged 50 Years and Older Is Associated With Good Outcomes in Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture. Validation of Foot Angular Measurements Using Intraoperative Simulated Weightbearing Fluoroscopic Images.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1