192 Developing a community laundromat intervention to increase reproductive health literacy outreach

Roxanne Mirabal-Beltran, Nandi Dube, Kelsey Rondini, Alejandra De Mendoza
{"title":"192 Developing a community laundromat intervention to increase reproductive health literacy outreach","authors":"Roxanne Mirabal-Beltran, Nandi Dube, Kelsey Rondini, Alejandra De Mendoza","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The project goal was to conduct formative work using community-based participatory research (CBPR) to inform the development of a laundromat-based reproductive health literacy intervention (LI)informed by Passhe-Orlow and Wolf’s Conceptual Model. We provide insights to support the development of similar health literacy interventions. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: In Phase I, we recruited female patrons over the age of 18 living in DC from 4 community laundromats. Participants completed a survey with validated measures to assess reproductive health knowledge, self-efficacy, and intentions to seek care. Open-ended questions assessed participants’ experiences accessing care, communication with health providers, and laundromat use. Data informed the development of a 2-3 minute reproductive health literacy intervention (LI) storyboard. In Phase II, in-depth interviews were conducted with reproductive health providers (midwives, obstetricians-gynecologists, women’s health registered nurses, women’s health nurse practitioners) working in the communities where the laundromats are located. LI acceptability and appropriateness were explored. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: For Phase I, we recruited 60 patrons. Participants (68.3%) expressed interest in a laundromat-based reproductive health literacy intervention (LI). Identified reproductive knowledge gaps included: unaware of fertile days (50.0%); believe prenatal care should begin after 2nd trimester of pregnancy (50.0%); unclear about pregnancy spacing (85.0%); unable to identify use for folic acid (91.7%); believe once a cesarean always a cesarean (53.3%). In Phase II, all 14 providers supported increasing community accessibility to health information: “we have to move beyond doing public health education in a provider’s office. That’s very outdated.” Providers identified the LI as an approachable, informative, and accessible way to disseminate health information. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Patron and provider input informed our choice of content, style, and delivery of the reproductive health literacy intervention. An essential aspect of our CBPR approach, this research will inform effective, appropriate reproductive health education despite barriers presented by access, transportation, and work schedules.","PeriodicalId":508693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"315 ","pages":"58 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The project goal was to conduct formative work using community-based participatory research (CBPR) to inform the development of a laundromat-based reproductive health literacy intervention (LI)informed by Passhe-Orlow and Wolf’s Conceptual Model. We provide insights to support the development of similar health literacy interventions. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: In Phase I, we recruited female patrons over the age of 18 living in DC from 4 community laundromats. Participants completed a survey with validated measures to assess reproductive health knowledge, self-efficacy, and intentions to seek care. Open-ended questions assessed participants’ experiences accessing care, communication with health providers, and laundromat use. Data informed the development of a 2-3 minute reproductive health literacy intervention (LI) storyboard. In Phase II, in-depth interviews were conducted with reproductive health providers (midwives, obstetricians-gynecologists, women’s health registered nurses, women’s health nurse practitioners) working in the communities where the laundromats are located. LI acceptability and appropriateness were explored. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: For Phase I, we recruited 60 patrons. Participants (68.3%) expressed interest in a laundromat-based reproductive health literacy intervention (LI). Identified reproductive knowledge gaps included: unaware of fertile days (50.0%); believe prenatal care should begin after 2nd trimester of pregnancy (50.0%); unclear about pregnancy spacing (85.0%); unable to identify use for folic acid (91.7%); believe once a cesarean always a cesarean (53.3%). In Phase II, all 14 providers supported increasing community accessibility to health information: “we have to move beyond doing public health education in a provider’s office. That’s very outdated.” Providers identified the LI as an approachable, informative, and accessible way to disseminate health information. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Patron and provider input informed our choice of content, style, and delivery of the reproductive health literacy intervention. An essential aspect of our CBPR approach, this research will inform effective, appropriate reproductive health education despite barriers presented by access, transportation, and work schedules.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
192 制定社区自助洗衣店干预措施,扩大生殖健康知识的宣传范围
目标/目的:该项目的目标是利用社区参与式研究(CBPR)开展形成性工作,为根据 Passhe-Orlow 和 Wolf 的概念模型开发基于自助洗衣店的生殖健康知识干预措施(LI)提供信息。我们为类似健康知识干预措施的开发提供了启示。方法/研究对象:在第一阶段,我们从 4 家社区自助洗衣店招募了居住在华盛顿特区的 18 岁以上女性顾客。参与者填写了一份调查问卷,其中包含评估生殖健康知识、自我效能和就医意向的有效措施。开放式问题评估了参与者的就医经历、与医疗服务提供者的沟通以及自助洗衣店的使用情况。数据为开发 2-3 分钟的生殖健康知识干预(LI)故事板提供了依据。在第二阶段,对洗衣店所在社区的生殖健康服务提供者(助产士、妇产科医生、妇女健康注册护士、妇女健康执业护士)进行了深入访谈。同时还探讨了洗衣店的可接受性和适宜性。结果/预期结果:在第一阶段,我们招募了 60 名顾客。参与者(68.3%)表示对以自助洗衣店为基础的生殖健康知识干预(LI)感兴趣。已确定的生殖知识缺口包括:不知道生育期(50.0%);认为产前保健应在怀孕两个月后开始(50.0%);不清楚怀孕间隔(85.0%);无法确定叶酸的用途(91.7%);认为一旦剖腹产就永远是剖腹产(53.3%)。在第二阶段,所有 14 位医疗服务提供者都支持增加社区获取健康信息的机会:"我们必须超越在医疗服务提供者办公室开展公共卫生教育的做法。这已经非常过时了"。医疗服务提供者认为 "LI "是一种平易近人、信息丰富、易于获取的健康信息传播方式。讨论/意义:受众和医疗服务提供者的意见为我们选择生殖健康知识干预的内容、风格和提供方式提供了依据。这项研究是我们 CBPR 方法的一个重要方面,它将为我们提供有效、适当的生殖健康教育信息,尽管会遇到交通、运输和工作时间安排等方面的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes in self-confidence in professional, personal and scientific skills by gender during physician scientist training at the University of Pittsburgh Developing a Bayesian Workshop for Full-time Staff Statisticians Inpatient Screening for Social Determinants of Health: A Quality Improvement Initiative The Epidemiology of Errors in Data Capture, Management, and Analysis: A Scoping Review of Retracted Articles and Retraction Notices in Clinical and Translational Research Interactive Visualization Tool to Understand and Monitor Health Disparities in Diabetes Care and Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1