How Vulnerable is Sub-Saharan Africa to Geoeconomic Fragmentation?

Marijn A. Bolhuis
{"title":"How Vulnerable is Sub-Saharan Africa to Geoeconomic Fragmentation?","authors":"Marijn A. Bolhuis","doi":"10.5089/9798400270796.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This paper studies the potential effects of geoeconomic fragmentation (GEF) in the sub-Saharan Africa region (SSA) through quantifying potential long-term economic costs. The paper considers two alternative GEF scenarios in which trade relations are fully or partially curtailed across world economies. Our quantification relies on a multi-country multi-sector general equilibrium model and takes a deep dive into the impact across SSA’s oil-rich, other resource-rich and non-resource-rich countries. The results are based on a detailed dataset including information for 136 tradable primary commodity and 24 manufacturing and services sectors in 145 countries—32 of which are in SSA. We find that under GEF, SSA could experience long-term wellfare losses of approximately 4 percent of GDP, twice the losses of the rest of the world. This strong effect results from the large losses of other resource-rich and non-resource rich countries in SSA, given their high dependence on commodity trade. However, if the world experiences a less severe GEF-induced trade disruption—a strategic decoupling—SSA countries could derive minor gains from the re-shuffling of global market supply, specially in energy products","PeriodicalId":504981,"journal":{"name":"IMF Working Papers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IMF Working Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400270796.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: This paper studies the potential effects of geoeconomic fragmentation (GEF) in the sub-Saharan Africa region (SSA) through quantifying potential long-term economic costs. The paper considers two alternative GEF scenarios in which trade relations are fully or partially curtailed across world economies. Our quantification relies on a multi-country multi-sector general equilibrium model and takes a deep dive into the impact across SSA’s oil-rich, other resource-rich and non-resource-rich countries. The results are based on a detailed dataset including information for 136 tradable primary commodity and 24 manufacturing and services sectors in 145 countries—32 of which are in SSA. We find that under GEF, SSA could experience long-term wellfare losses of approximately 4 percent of GDP, twice the losses of the rest of the world. This strong effect results from the large losses of other resource-rich and non-resource rich countries in SSA, given their high dependence on commodity trade. However, if the world experiences a less severe GEF-induced trade disruption—a strategic decoupling—SSA countries could derive minor gains from the re-shuffling of global market supply, specially in energy products
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
撒哈拉以南非洲有多容易受到地缘经济分化的影响?
:本文通过量化潜在的长期经济成本,研究了撒哈拉以南非洲地区(SSA)地缘经济分割(GEF)的潜在影响。本文考虑了两种不同的地缘经济分割情景,即世界各经济体之间的贸易关系完全或部分缩减。我们的量化依赖于多国多部门一般均衡模型,并深入研究了对撒哈拉以南非洲石油资源丰富、其他资源丰富和非资源丰富国家的影响。研究结果基于一个详细的数据集,其中包括 145 个国家(其中 32 个国家位于撒哈拉以南非洲)的 136 个可交易初级商品部门和 24 个制造业及服务业部门的信息。我们发现,在全球环境基金的作用下,撒南非洲的长期福利损失可能达到国内生产总值的 4%左右,是世界其他地区的两倍。由于撒南非洲高度依赖商品贸易,其他资源丰富和非资源丰富的国家也会蒙受巨大损失,因此才会产生如此强烈的影响。然而,如果全球环境基金引发的贸易中断不那么严重--即战略脱钩,那么撒哈拉以南非洲国家可能会从全球市场供应的重新洗牌中获得少量收益,特别是在能源产品方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Global Financial Cycle: Quantities versus Prices Minimum Wages, Inequality, and the Informal Sector Gender Diversity and Corporate Resilience to Climate Change: Evidence from Greenfield Investments From Adoption to Innovation: State-Dependent Technology Policy in Developing Countries Deciphering Delphic Guidance: The Bank of England and Brexit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1