Amplifying Youth Voices Using Digital Technology: A Case Study in Collaborative Research With Youth Service Organizations

Rachel M. Magee, Amy M. Leman, Gowri Balasubramaniam
{"title":"Amplifying Youth Voices Using Digital Technology: A Case Study in Collaborative Research With Youth Service Organizations","authors":"Rachel M. Magee, Amy M. Leman, Gowri Balasubramaniam","doi":"10.35844/001c.92282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents three participatory methods informed by design techniques for engaging youth and youth services providers in research activities online. We detail two data collection methods: 1) a priming activity completed before a focus group to prompt reflection before direct interaction with the research team; and 2) a focus group activity imagining future organizational goals. We also share our technique for collaboratively analyzing preliminary research findings with a focus group activity. We developed these methods as a part of a larger research project examining how teens and those who provide services to teens through community programs conceptualized success in their experiences, sense of community, and program implementation. This paper discusses work with five organizations in a mid-size community in the midwestern United States during the COVID-19 pandemic (July 2021–February 2022). We aimed to amplify the voices and perspectives of teens in both research and the organizations they engaged in, bringing their participation to our data collection and analysis and to the adults and decision-makers of community organizations. We wanted to understand how youth or teens, defined as 13–19 years old, describe successful experiences in these out-of-school settings, how adults define success, and to identify connections and differences between these two perspectives. This paper details the techniques we developed and tested, shares examples from our research, and discusses the impacts and implications of these methods for future participatory work. We contribute evidence for the value of drawing on design methods for participatory methods, articulate benefits and considerations for intentionally doing so online, and share techniques that emphasize voice in both research and organizational partners’ program development and management.","PeriodicalId":73887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of participatory research methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of participatory research methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.92282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents three participatory methods informed by design techniques for engaging youth and youth services providers in research activities online. We detail two data collection methods: 1) a priming activity completed before a focus group to prompt reflection before direct interaction with the research team; and 2) a focus group activity imagining future organizational goals. We also share our technique for collaboratively analyzing preliminary research findings with a focus group activity. We developed these methods as a part of a larger research project examining how teens and those who provide services to teens through community programs conceptualized success in their experiences, sense of community, and program implementation. This paper discusses work with five organizations in a mid-size community in the midwestern United States during the COVID-19 pandemic (July 2021–February 2022). We aimed to amplify the voices and perspectives of teens in both research and the organizations they engaged in, bringing their participation to our data collection and analysis and to the adults and decision-makers of community organizations. We wanted to understand how youth or teens, defined as 13–19 years old, describe successful experiences in these out-of-school settings, how adults define success, and to identify connections and differences between these two perspectives. This paper details the techniques we developed and tested, shares examples from our research, and discusses the impacts and implications of these methods for future participatory work. We contribute evidence for the value of drawing on design methods for participatory methods, articulate benefits and considerations for intentionally doing so online, and share techniques that emphasize voice in both research and organizational partners’ program development and management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用数字技术放大青年的声音:与青年服务组织合作研究的案例研究
本文介绍了三种参与式方法,这些方法借鉴了让青少年和青少年服务提供者参与在线研究活动的设计技术。我们详细介绍了两种数据收集方法:1)在与研究团队直接互动之前,在焦点小组活动之前完成一个引导活动,以促进思考;2)一个想象未来组织目标的焦点小组活动。我们还分享了通过焦点小组活动合作分析初步研究结果的技巧。我们开发的这些方法是一个大型研究项目的一部分,该项目研究青少年和那些通过社区项目为青少年提供服务的人如何在他们的经历、社区意识和项目实施中将成功概念化。本文讨论了在 COVID-19 大流行期间(2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 2 月)与美国中西部一个中等规模社区的五个组织合作开展的工作。我们的目标是在研究和青少年参与的组织中扩大青少年的声音和视角,让他们参与到我们的数据收集和分析中,并让社区组织的成年人和决策者参与其中。我们希望了解青少年(定义为 13-19 岁)如何描述在这些校外环境中的成功经历,成年人如何定义成功,并找出这两种观点之间的联系和差异。本文详细介绍了我们开发和测试的技术,分享了我们研究中的实例,并讨论了这些方法对未来参与式工作的影响和意义。我们为借鉴参与式方法的设计方法的价值提供了证据,阐明了有意在网上这样做的好处和注意事项,并分享了在研究和组织合作伙伴的项目开发和管理中强调发言权的技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial: ”How Communities and Research Institutions Work Together to Dismantle Structural Racism and Advance Health Equity” Program Evaluation and Improvement by a Homeless Community Using a Human Centered Design Approach The RESPCCT Study: Community-led Development of a Person-Centered Instrument to Measure Health Equity in Perinatal Services The Equity-Centered Participatory Compensation Model (EPCM): A Tutorial for This Emergent Methodology Amplifying Youth Voices Using Digital Technology: A Case Study in Collaborative Research With Youth Service Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1