Slowing of Parameterized Resting-State Electroencephalography After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

IF 1.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurotrauma reports Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1089/neur.2024.0004
Mark C. Nwakamma, Alexandra M. Stillman, Laurel Gabard-Durnam, James F. Cavanagh, Charles H. Hillman, Timothy P. Morris
{"title":"Slowing of Parameterized Resting-State Electroencephalography After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury","authors":"Mark C. Nwakamma, Alexandra M. Stillman, Laurel Gabard-Durnam, James F. Cavanagh, Charles H. Hillman, Timothy P. Morris","doi":"10.1089/neur.2024.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reported changes in electroencephalography (EEG)-derived spectral power after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) remains inconsistent across existing literature. However, this may be a result of previous analyses depending solely on observing spectral power within traditional canonical frequency bands rather than accounting for the aperiodic activity within the collected neural signal. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test for differences in rhythmic and arrhythmic time series across the brain, and in the cognitively relevant frontoparietal (FP) network, and observe whether those differences were associated with cognitive recovery post-mTBI. Resting-state electroencephalography (rs-EEG) was collected from 88 participants (56 mTBI and 32 age- and sex-matched healthy controls) within 14 days of injury for the mTBI participants. A battery of executive function (EF) tests was collected at the first session with follow-up metrics collected approximately 2 and 4 months after the initial visit. After spectral parameterization, a significant between-group difference in aperiodic-adjusted alpha center peak frequency within the FP network was observed, where a slowing of alpha peak frequency was found in the mTBI group in comparison to the healthy controls. This slowing of week 2 (collected within 2 weeks of injury) aperiodic-adjusted alpha center peak frequency within the FP network was associated with increased EF over time (evaluated using executive composite scores) post-mTBI. These findings suggest alpha center peak frequency within the FP network as a candidate prognostic marker of EF recovery and may inform clinical rehabilitative methods post-mTBI.","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurotrauma reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neur.2024.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reported changes in electroencephalography (EEG)-derived spectral power after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) remains inconsistent across existing literature. However, this may be a result of previous analyses depending solely on observing spectral power within traditional canonical frequency bands rather than accounting for the aperiodic activity within the collected neural signal. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test for differences in rhythmic and arrhythmic time series across the brain, and in the cognitively relevant frontoparietal (FP) network, and observe whether those differences were associated with cognitive recovery post-mTBI. Resting-state electroencephalography (rs-EEG) was collected from 88 participants (56 mTBI and 32 age- and sex-matched healthy controls) within 14 days of injury for the mTBI participants. A battery of executive function (EF) tests was collected at the first session with follow-up metrics collected approximately 2 and 4 months after the initial visit. After spectral parameterization, a significant between-group difference in aperiodic-adjusted alpha center peak frequency within the FP network was observed, where a slowing of alpha peak frequency was found in the mTBI group in comparison to the healthy controls. This slowing of week 2 (collected within 2 weeks of injury) aperiodic-adjusted alpha center peak frequency within the FP network was associated with increased EF over time (evaluated using executive composite scores) post-mTBI. These findings suggest alpha center peak frequency within the FP network as a candidate prognostic marker of EF recovery and may inform clinical rehabilitative methods post-mTBI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轻度脑外伤后参数化静息状态脑电图变慢
据报道,轻度脑外伤(mTBI)后脑电图(EEG)得出的频谱功率变化在现有文献中仍不一致。然而,这可能是由于以前的分析仅仅依赖于观察传统标准频带内的频谱功率,而没有考虑到所收集的神经信号中的非周期性活动。因此,本研究旨在测试整个大脑以及与认知相关的顶叶前部(FP)网络中节律性和节律性时间序列的差异,并观察这些差异是否与创伤性脑损伤后的认知恢复有关。研究人员收集了 88 名参与者(56 名创伤性脑损伤患者和 32 名年龄和性别匹配的健康对照者)的静息态脑电图(rs-EEG),其中创伤性脑损伤患者在受伤后 14 天内进行了静息态脑电图检查。在首次治疗时收集了一系列执行功能(EF)测试,并在首次就诊后约 2 个月和 4 个月收集了随访指标。在对频谱进行参数化处理后,观察到 FP 网络内经非周期性调整的阿尔法中心峰频率存在显著的组间差异,与健康对照组相比,mTBI 组的阿尔法峰频率有所减慢。第 2 周(受伤后 2 周内收集)FP 网络内经周期性调整的阿尔法中心峰频率的减慢与创伤后随着时间推移(使用执行力综合评分进行评估)EF 的增加有关。这些发现表明,FP网络内的α中心峰值频率是EF恢复的候选预后标志物,可为创伤性脑损伤后的临床康复方法提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Small Molecule Drug C381 Attenuates Brain Vascular Damage Following Repetitive Mild Traumatic Injury. Clinical Impact of an AI Decision Support System for Detection of Intracranial Hemorrhage in CT Scans. Metacognitive Therapy for People Experiencing Persistent Post-Concussion Symptoms Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Preliminary Multiple Case-Series Study. Multicenter Study Examining Temporal Trends in Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage Over Six Years Using Joinpoint Regression. Resilience and Concussion Recovery in Minority Women: Promoting Health Equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1