Antinuclear antibody (ANA) positivity pattern by line immunoassay in a hospital from eastern India: Update from a laboratory perspective

Ayan Banerjee, Alok Ranjan, M. Kumar, Sushil Kumar, Akash Bansal, Mala Mahto
{"title":"Antinuclear antibody (ANA) positivity pattern by line immunoassay in a hospital from eastern India: Update from a laboratory perspective","authors":"Ayan Banerjee, Alok Ranjan, M. Kumar, Sushil Kumar, Akash Bansal, Mala Mahto","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1170_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n The existence of more than one antibody in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) or connective tissue disease (CTD) along with features of more than one autoimmune disease (AD) in an individual is suggestive of overlap syndrome (OS). Line immunoassay (LIA) can target many autoantibodies in a single approach, thus making the identification of OS feasible.\n \n \n \n This study aimed to identify the pattern of distribution of antinuclear antibodies by LIA prevalent in a hospital population in eastern India and identify common forms of SARD in this belt based on laboratory findings.\n \n \n \n A total of 1660 samples received for ANA profile testing by LIA were analysed.\n \n \n \n Factor analysis was performed with factor loading scores used in the k-means algorithm to identify clustering of various autoantibodies.\n \n \n \n U1-snRNP positivity was the highest at 16.69%, and the least frequent autoantibody noted was anti-Jo-1 at 0.71% positivity. Based on the outcome of factor analysis, three clusters were determined. Cluster 1 showed a predominance of anti-PM/Scl antibodies, cluster 2 showed a predominance of anti-dsDNA, anti-histone, anti-SmD1, anti-nucleosomes, anti-PCNA, anti-Po, anti-SSA/Ro52, anti-SSA-Ro60, anti-SSB/La, anti-Scl-70, anti-Mi-2, anti-Ku and anti-AMA-M2, and cluster 3 showed a predominance of anti-U1-snRNP.\n \n \n \n Mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) and overlap syndrome (OS) are prevalent more than pure form of an AD in our study population. OS may be missed out by monospecific immunoassays and hence adds to diagnostic challenges. LIA may be more useful in identifying specific autoantibodies by a single approach rather than monospecific immunoassays in populations after a positive screen by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF).\n","PeriodicalId":509702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1170_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The existence of more than one antibody in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) or connective tissue disease (CTD) along with features of more than one autoimmune disease (AD) in an individual is suggestive of overlap syndrome (OS). Line immunoassay (LIA) can target many autoantibodies in a single approach, thus making the identification of OS feasible. This study aimed to identify the pattern of distribution of antinuclear antibodies by LIA prevalent in a hospital population in eastern India and identify common forms of SARD in this belt based on laboratory findings. A total of 1660 samples received for ANA profile testing by LIA were analysed. Factor analysis was performed with factor loading scores used in the k-means algorithm to identify clustering of various autoantibodies. U1-snRNP positivity was the highest at 16.69%, and the least frequent autoantibody noted was anti-Jo-1 at 0.71% positivity. Based on the outcome of factor analysis, three clusters were determined. Cluster 1 showed a predominance of anti-PM/Scl antibodies, cluster 2 showed a predominance of anti-dsDNA, anti-histone, anti-SmD1, anti-nucleosomes, anti-PCNA, anti-Po, anti-SSA/Ro52, anti-SSA-Ro60, anti-SSB/La, anti-Scl-70, anti-Mi-2, anti-Ku and anti-AMA-M2, and cluster 3 showed a predominance of anti-U1-snRNP. Mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) and overlap syndrome (OS) are prevalent more than pure form of an AD in our study population. OS may be missed out by monospecific immunoassays and hence adds to diagnostic challenges. LIA may be more useful in identifying specific autoantibodies by a single approach rather than monospecific immunoassays in populations after a positive screen by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度东部一家医院的线性免疫测定抗核抗体 (ANA) 阳性模式:从实验室角度看最新情况
摘要 系统性自身免疫性风湿病(SARDs)或结缔组织病(CTD)中存在一种以上的抗体,同时一个人体内存在一种以上自身免疫性疾病(AD)的特征,这就提示存在重叠综合征(OS)。线性免疫测定(LIA)可通过单一方法针对多种自身抗体进行检测,从而使 OS 的鉴定变得可行。 本研究旨在通过线性免疫测定(LIA)确定印度东部医院人群中流行的抗核抗体的分布模式,并根据实验室结果确定该地区常见的 SARD 形式。 本研究共分析了 1660 份通过 LIA 检测 ANA 的样本。 采用 k-means 算法进行因子分析和因子负荷得分,以确定各种自身抗体的聚类。 U1-snRNP 阳性率最高,为 16.69%,最少见的自身抗体是抗 Jo-1,阳性率为 0.71%。根据因子分析结果,确定了三个群组。群组1以抗PM/Scl抗体为主,群组2以抗dsDNA、抗组蛋白、抗SmD1、抗核糖体、抗PCNA、抗Po、抗SSA/Ro52、抗SSA-Ro60、抗SSB/La、抗Scl-70、抗Mi-2、抗Ku和抗AMA-M2为主,群组3以抗U1-snRNP为主。 在我们的研究人群中,混合结缔组织病(MCTD)和重叠综合征(OS)的发病率高于纯合子。单特异性免疫测定可能会漏掉重叠综合征,从而增加诊断难度。在间接免疫荧光(IIF)筛查阳性的人群中,LIA可能比单特异性免疫测定更有助于通过单一方法鉴定特异性自身抗体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diabetes Mellitus and Other Comorbidities: Outcome among Covid-19 Patients in Kerala: A Retrospective Observational Study Young hearts at risk: Unveiling novel factors in myocardial infarction susceptibility and prevention An uncommon presentation of segmental Becker’s nevus involving the T4 dermatome Investigation of the frequency and relationship between trichomonas infection in the preterm delivery (a case-control study in Amir Al-Momenin Hospital, Semnan) A case of lepromatous leprosy in a background of chronic hepatitis B infection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1