Evaluation of an electronic prescription platform: Clinicians’ feedback on three distinct services aiming to facilitate clinical decision and safer e-prescription

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.04.004
Margarita Grammatikopoulou , Martha Zachariadou , Maria Zande , Georgios Giannios , Achilleas Chytas , Haralampos Karanikas , Spiros Georgakopoulos , Dimitrios Karanikas , George Nikolaidis , Pantelis Natsiavas , Thanos G. Stavropoulos , Spiros Nikolopoulos , Ioannis Kompatsiaris
{"title":"Evaluation of an electronic prescription platform: Clinicians’ feedback on three distinct services aiming to facilitate clinical decision and safer e-prescription","authors":"Margarita Grammatikopoulou ,&nbsp;Martha Zachariadou ,&nbsp;Maria Zande ,&nbsp;Georgios Giannios ,&nbsp;Achilleas Chytas ,&nbsp;Haralampos Karanikas ,&nbsp;Spiros Georgakopoulos ,&nbsp;Dimitrios Karanikas ,&nbsp;George Nikolaidis ,&nbsp;Pantelis Natsiavas ,&nbsp;Thanos G. Stavropoulos ,&nbsp;Spiros Nikolopoulos ,&nbsp;Ioannis Kompatsiaris","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Health Care Professionals (HCPs) are the main end-users of digital clinical tools such as electronic prescription systems. For this reason, it is of high importance to include HCPs throughout the design, development and evaluation of a newly introduced system to ensure its usefulness, as well as confirm that it tends to their needs and can be integrated in their everyday clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In the context of the PrescIT project, an electronic prescription platform with three services was developed (i.e., Prescription Check, Prescription Suggestion, Therapeutic Prescription Monitoring). To allow an iterative process of discovery through user feedback, design and implementation, a two-phase evaluation was carried out, with the participation of HCPs from three hospitals in Northern Greece. The two-phase evaluation included presentations of the platform, followed by think-aloud sessions, individual platform testing and the collection of qualitative as well as quantitative feedback, through standard questionnaires (e.g., SUS, PSSUQ).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty one HCPs (8 in the first, 18 in the second phase, and five present in both) participated in the two-phase evaluation. HCPs comprised clinicians varying in their specialty and one pharmacist. Clinicians' feedback during the first evaluation phase already deemed usability as “excellent” (with SUS scores ranging from 75 to 95/100, showing a mean value of 86.6 and SD of 9.2) but also provided additional user requirements, which further shaped and improved the services. In the second evaluation phase, clinicians explored the system's usability, and identified the services' strengths and weaknesses. Clinicians perceived the platform as useful, as it provides information on potential adverse drug reactions, drug-to-drug interactions and suggests medications that are compatible with patients' comorbidities and current medication.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The developed PrescIT platform aims to increase overall safety and effectiveness of healthcare services. Therefore, including clinicians in a two-phase evaluation confirmed that the introduced system is useful, tends to the users’ needs, does not create fatigue and can be integrated in their everyday clinical practice to support clinical decision and e-prescribing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":"20 7","pages":"Pages 640-647"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741124001189/pdfft?md5=386d726e0644157cea3c46af2a070665&pid=1-s2.0-S1551741124001189-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741124001189","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Health Care Professionals (HCPs) are the main end-users of digital clinical tools such as electronic prescription systems. For this reason, it is of high importance to include HCPs throughout the design, development and evaluation of a newly introduced system to ensure its usefulness, as well as confirm that it tends to their needs and can be integrated in their everyday clinical practice.

Methods

In the context of the PrescIT project, an electronic prescription platform with three services was developed (i.e., Prescription Check, Prescription Suggestion, Therapeutic Prescription Monitoring). To allow an iterative process of discovery through user feedback, design and implementation, a two-phase evaluation was carried out, with the participation of HCPs from three hospitals in Northern Greece. The two-phase evaluation included presentations of the platform, followed by think-aloud sessions, individual platform testing and the collection of qualitative as well as quantitative feedback, through standard questionnaires (e.g., SUS, PSSUQ).

Results

Twenty one HCPs (8 in the first, 18 in the second phase, and five present in both) participated in the two-phase evaluation. HCPs comprised clinicians varying in their specialty and one pharmacist. Clinicians' feedback during the first evaluation phase already deemed usability as “excellent” (with SUS scores ranging from 75 to 95/100, showing a mean value of 86.6 and SD of 9.2) but also provided additional user requirements, which further shaped and improved the services. In the second evaluation phase, clinicians explored the system's usability, and identified the services' strengths and weaknesses. Clinicians perceived the platform as useful, as it provides information on potential adverse drug reactions, drug-to-drug interactions and suggests medications that are compatible with patients' comorbidities and current medication.

Conclusions

The developed PrescIT platform aims to increase overall safety and effectiveness of healthcare services. Therefore, including clinicians in a two-phase evaluation confirmed that the introduced system is useful, tends to the users’ needs, does not create fatigue and can be integrated in their everyday clinical practice to support clinical decision and e-prescribing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子处方平台评估:临床医生对旨在促进临床决策和更安全电子处方的三种不同服务的反馈意见。
背景医疗保健专业人员(HCP)是电子处方系统等数字化临床工具的主要最终用户。因此,在新系统的设计、开发和评估过程中让医护人员参与进来,以确保系统的实用性,并确认系统符合医护人员的需求并能与他们的日常临床实践相结合,具有十分重要的意义。方法在 PrescIT 项目的背景下,开发了一个包含三种服务(即处方检查、处方建议和治疗处方监控)的电子处方平台。为了能够通过用户反馈、设计和实施的迭代过程进行探索,在希腊北部三家医院的医疗保健人员的参与下,进行了两个阶段的评估。两个阶段的评估包括平台演示,随后是畅所欲言环节、个人平台测试,以及通过标准问卷(如 SUS、PSSUQ)收集定性和定量反馈。医疗保健人员包括不同专业的临床医生和一名药剂师。临床医生在第一评估阶段的反馈意见已将可用性评定为 "优秀"(SUS 评分范围为 75 至 95/100,平均值为 86.6,标准差为 9.2),但同时也提出了更多用户需求,从而进一步塑造和改进了服务。在第二评估阶段,临床医生探讨了系统的可用性,并找出了服务的优缺点。临床医生认为该平台非常有用,因为它提供了有关潜在药物不良反应、药物间相互作用的信息,并推荐了与患者合并症和当前用药相匹配的药物。因此,让临床医生参与两个阶段的评估证实,所引入的系统是有用的,符合用户需求,不会造成疲劳,并可融入日常临床实践,以支持临床决策和电子处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.
期刊最新文献
Concordance between pharmacy dispensing and electronic monitoring data of direct oral anticoagulants - A secondary analysis of the MAAESTRO study. Development and validation of a predictive scoring model for risk stratification of tuberculosis treatment interruption. The effects of free prescriptions on community pharmacy selection: A discrete choice experiment. A graphical model to make explicit pharmacist clinical reasoning during medication review. Developing and validating development goals towards transforming a global framework for pharmacy practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1