Are there etiology-specific risk factors for adverse outcomes in patients on Impella 5.5 support?

{"title":"Are there etiology-specific risk factors for adverse outcomes in patients on Impella 5.5 support?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To identify possible etiology-specific differences in preoperative risk factors for major adverse events during Impella 5.5 support in patients with ischemic (ICM) and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From October 2019 to January 2023, 228 Impella 5.5 devices were inserted at our institution. Patients were stratified into ICM (n = 124) and NICM (n = 104) cohorts. The primary outcome was a composite of death/stroke/new-onset dialysis while actively receiving Impella 5.5 support. Random forests identified preoperative factors predictive of the primary outcome separately for each cohort, with ranking by variable importance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The primary outcome occurred in 42 (34%) patients with ICM and 35 (34%) patients with NICM. Twenty-one (17%) patients with ICM and 21 (20%) patients with NICM died on Impella 5.5; stroke occurred in 12 (9.7%) patients with ICM and 3 (2.9%) patients with NICM, and new-onset dialysis was initiated in 23 (19%) patients with ICM and 24 (23%) patients with NICM while actively receiving Impella 5.5 support. Risk factors reflecting systemic and myocardial cellular injury, end-organ and cardiopulmonary failure, right ventricular dysfunction, and smaller left ventricular dimensions were most predictive of adverse outcomes in both cohorts. Indications for Impella 5.5 and device strategy (bridge to recovery, advanced therapies, or decision) were not top risk factors in either cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Risk factors related to preoperative stability, right ventricular dysfunction, and left ventricular size were more predictive of adverse outcomes while actively receiving Impella 5.5 support than indication or device strategy. These factors could help identify high-risk patients who may benefit from additional tailored management to reduce their risk for these impactful adverse outcomes while on Impella 5.5 support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"21 ","pages":"Pages 123-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624001177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To identify possible etiology-specific differences in preoperative risk factors for major adverse events during Impella 5.5 support in patients with ischemic (ICM) and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM).

Methods

From October 2019 to January 2023, 228 Impella 5.5 devices were inserted at our institution. Patients were stratified into ICM (n = 124) and NICM (n = 104) cohorts. The primary outcome was a composite of death/stroke/new-onset dialysis while actively receiving Impella 5.5 support. Random forests identified preoperative factors predictive of the primary outcome separately for each cohort, with ranking by variable importance.

Results

The primary outcome occurred in 42 (34%) patients with ICM and 35 (34%) patients with NICM. Twenty-one (17%) patients with ICM and 21 (20%) patients with NICM died on Impella 5.5; stroke occurred in 12 (9.7%) patients with ICM and 3 (2.9%) patients with NICM, and new-onset dialysis was initiated in 23 (19%) patients with ICM and 24 (23%) patients with NICM while actively receiving Impella 5.5 support. Risk factors reflecting systemic and myocardial cellular injury, end-organ and cardiopulmonary failure, right ventricular dysfunction, and smaller left ventricular dimensions were most predictive of adverse outcomes in both cohorts. Indications for Impella 5.5 and device strategy (bridge to recovery, advanced therapies, or decision) were not top risk factors in either cohort.

Conclusions

Risk factors related to preoperative stability, right ventricular dysfunction, and left ventricular size were more predictive of adverse outcomes while actively receiving Impella 5.5 support than indication or device strategy. These factors could help identify high-risk patients who may benefit from additional tailored management to reduce their risk for these impactful adverse outcomes while on Impella 5.5 support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 Impella 5.5 支持系统的患者出现不良预后是否存在特定病因的风险因素?
目的确定缺血性(ICM)和非缺血性心肌病(NICM)患者在接受 Impella 5.5 支持期间发生主要不良事件的术前风险因素可能存在的病因特异性差异。方法从 2019 年 10 月到 2023 年 1 月,我院共植入了 228 台 Impella 5.5 装置。患者被分为 ICM 组(124 人)和 NICM 组(104 人)。主要结果是在积极接受Impella 5.5支持期间死亡/中风/新发透析的复合结果。随机森林分别确定了每个队列中预测主要结局的术前因素,并按变量重要性进行了排序。结果42(34%)名 ICM 患者和 35(34%)名 NICM 患者出现了主要结局。21 名 ICM 患者(17%)和 21 名 NICM 患者(20%)在接受 Impella 5.5 支持期间死亡;12 名 ICM 患者(9.7%)和 3 名 NICM 患者(2.9%)发生中风;23 名 ICM 患者(19%)和 24 名 NICM 患者(23%)在积极接受 Impella 5.5 支持期间开始新发透析。反映全身和心肌细胞损伤、内脏器官和心肺功能衰竭、右心室功能障碍和左心室尺寸较小的风险因素最能预测这两组患者的不良预后。结论与术前稳定性、右心室功能障碍和左心室尺寸相关的风险因素比适应症或设备策略更能预测积极接受Impella 5.5支持时的不良预后。这些因素有助于识别高风险患者,这些患者可能受益于额外的定制化管理,以降低他们在接受Impella 5.5支持时出现这些有影响的不良后果的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Repair of acute type A aortic dissection: The simplest solution is not always the best Are there etiology-specific risk factors for adverse outcomes in patients on Impella 5.5 support? Type B aortic dissection in Marfan patients after the David procedure: Insights from patient-specific simulation Reoperation after aortic root replacement and its impact on long-term survival Should we wait until the morning?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1