Third-party virus-specific T cells for the treatment of double-stranded DNA viral reactivation and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease after solid organ transplant

IF 8.9 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American Journal of Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajt.2024.04.009
{"title":"Third-party virus-specific T cells for the treatment of double-stranded DNA viral reactivation and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease after solid organ transplant","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajt.2024.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Reactivation or primary infection with double-stranded DNA viruses is common in recipients of solid organ </span>transplants (SOTs) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Treatment with conventional antiviral medications is limited by toxicities, resistance, and a lack of effective options for </span>adenovirus<span><span><span> (ADV) and BK polyomavirus (BKPyV). Virus-specific </span>T cells (VSTs) have been shown to be an effective treatment for infections with ADV, BKPyV, </span>cytomegalovirus<span> (CMV), and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Most of these studies have been conducted in stem cell recipients, and no large studies have been published in the SOT population to date. In this study, we report on the outcome of quadrivalent third-party VST infusions in 98 recipients of SOTs in the context of an open-label phase 2 trial. The 98 patients received a total of 181 infusions, with a median of 2 infusions per patient. The overall response rate was 45% for BKPyV, 65% for cytomegalovirus<span>, 68% for ADV, and 61% for Epstein-Barr virus. Twenty percent of patients with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder<span> had a complete response and 40% of patients had a partial response. All the VST infusions were well tolerated. We conclude that VSTs are safe and effective in the treatment of viral infections in SOT recipients.</span></span></span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":123,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1600613524002806","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reactivation or primary infection with double-stranded DNA viruses is common in recipients of solid organ transplants (SOTs) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Treatment with conventional antiviral medications is limited by toxicities, resistance, and a lack of effective options for adenovirus (ADV) and BK polyomavirus (BKPyV). Virus-specific T cells (VSTs) have been shown to be an effective treatment for infections with ADV, BKPyV, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Most of these studies have been conducted in stem cell recipients, and no large studies have been published in the SOT population to date. In this study, we report on the outcome of quadrivalent third-party VST infusions in 98 recipients of SOTs in the context of an open-label phase 2 trial. The 98 patients received a total of 181 infusions, with a median of 2 infusions per patient. The overall response rate was 45% for BKPyV, 65% for cytomegalovirus, 68% for ADV, and 61% for Epstein-Barr virus. Twenty percent of patients with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder had a complete response and 40% of patients had a partial response. All the VST infusions were well tolerated. We conclude that VSTs are safe and effective in the treatment of viral infections in SOT recipients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗实体器官移植后双链 DNA 病毒再活化和 PTLD 的第三方病毒特异性 T 细胞。
双链 DNA 病毒再激活或原发感染在实体器官移植(SOT)受者中很常见,并与严重的发病率和死亡率相关。传统的抗病毒药物治疗因毒性、耐药性以及缺乏针对腺病毒(ADV)和BK多瘤病毒(BKPyV)的有效选择而受到限制。病毒特异性 T 细胞(VST)已被证明是治疗 ADV、BKPyV、巨细胞病毒(CMV)和 Epstein-Barr 病毒(EBV)感染的有效方法。这些研究大多是在干细胞受者中进行的,迄今为止还没有发表过针对SOT人群的大型研究。在本研究中,我们报告了在一项开放标签2期试验中,98名SOT受者接受四价第三方VST输注的结果。98 名患者共接受了 181 次输液,每位患者输液次数的中位数为 2 次。对 BKPyV 的总体应答率为 45%,对巨细胞病毒的应答率为 65%,对 ADV 的应答率为 68%,对 Epstein-Barr 病毒的应答率为 61%。20%的移植后淋巴增生性疾病患者获得了完全应答,40%的患者获得了部分应答。所有 VST 输注的耐受性都很好。我们的结论是,VST 对治疗 SOT 受者的病毒感染安全有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Transplantation is a leading journal in the field of transplantation. It serves as a forum for debate and reassessment, an agent of change, and a major platform for promoting understanding, improving results, and advancing science. Published monthly, it provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians worldwide. The journal publishes original articles, case reports, invited reviews, letters to the editor, critical reviews, news features, consensus documents, and guidelines over 12 issues a year. It covers all major subject areas in transplantation, including thoracic (heart, lung), abdominal (kidney, liver, pancreas, islets), tissue and stem cell transplantation, organ and tissue donation and preservation, tissue injury, repair, inflammation, and aging, histocompatibility, drugs and pharmacology, graft survival, and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure. It also explores ethical and social issues in the field.
期刊最新文献
The Dangerous Precedent of Censoring Scientific Dissemination. Updated Seasonal Influenza and RSV Vaccine Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - 2024. Outside Front Cover The hepatocyte growth factor mimetic, ANG-3777, in kidney transplant recipients with delayed graft function: Results from a randomized phase 3 trial Morning administration enhances humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in kidney transplant recipients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1