Health Technology Assessment: Evaluation of 7 Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Zeyu Xie, Jia Hu, Mengting Li, Xiao Hu, Jisheng Chen
{"title":"Health Technology Assessment: Evaluation of 7 Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus","authors":"Zeyu Xie, Jia Hu, Mengting Li, Xiao Hu, Jisheng Chen","doi":"10.2147/rmhp.s455897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study provides a reference for healthcare organizations in the selection and rational use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), based on the Rapid Guide for Drug Evaluation and Selection in Chinese Medical Institutions (Second Edition). Methods: According to the Rapid Guide for Drug Evaluation and Selection in Chinese Medical Institutions (Second Edition) released in 2023, relevant databases such as PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase, drug labels, and clinical guidelines were searched for drug information. We systematically evaluated 7 GLP-1RAs marketed in China for safety, efficacy, economy, pharmacological properties, and other attributes using a percentage scoring method. Results: The final assessment result scores from highest to lowest were semaglutide (71.5 points), dulaglutide (68.9 points), liraglutide (68.7 points), exenatide (62.5 points), lixisenatide (59.9 points), polyethylene glycol loxenatide (55.9 points), and benaglutide (45.1 points). Conclusion: When a healthcare organization introduces GLP-1RAs to their hospital, they can refer to the assessment results and use the top three recommended medications: semaglutide, dulaglutide, and liraglutide.","PeriodicalId":506758,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"71 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s455897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study provides a reference for healthcare organizations in the selection and rational use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), based on the Rapid Guide for Drug Evaluation and Selection in Chinese Medical Institutions (Second Edition). Methods: According to the Rapid Guide for Drug Evaluation and Selection in Chinese Medical Institutions (Second Edition) released in 2023, relevant databases such as PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase, drug labels, and clinical guidelines were searched for drug information. We systematically evaluated 7 GLP-1RAs marketed in China for safety, efficacy, economy, pharmacological properties, and other attributes using a percentage scoring method. Results: The final assessment result scores from highest to lowest were semaglutide (71.5 points), dulaglutide (68.9 points), liraglutide (68.7 points), exenatide (62.5 points), lixisenatide (59.9 points), polyethylene glycol loxenatide (55.9 points), and benaglutide (45.1 points). Conclusion: When a healthcare organization introduces GLP-1RAs to their hospital, they can refer to the assessment results and use the top three recommended medications: semaglutide, dulaglutide, and liraglutide.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康技术评估:评估用于治疗 2 型糖尿病的 7 种胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂
目的:本研究以《中国医疗机构药品评价与遴选快速指南(第二版)》为基础,为医疗机构选择和合理使用胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)提供参考。方法:根据2023年发布的《中国医疗机构药品评价与遴选快速指南(第二版)》,在PubMed、Cochrane和Embase等相关数据库、药品标签和临床指南中检索药物信息。采用百分制评分法对在中国上市的7种GLP-1RA进行了安全性、有效性、经济性、药理特性等方面的系统评价。结果最终评估结果得分从高到低依次为塞马鲁肽(71.5分)、度拉鲁肽(68.9分)、利拉鲁肽(68.7分)、艾塞那肽(62.5分)、利西那肽(59.9分)、聚乙二醇洛塞那肽(55.9分)和贝那鲁肽(45.1分)。结论当医疗机构将 GLP-1RA 引入其医院时,可参考评估结果并使用前三名推荐药物:塞马鲁肽、度拉鲁肽和利拉鲁肽。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Response to “Sexual Harassment Among Chinese Psychiatrists and Its Impact on Quality of Life: A Cross-Sectional Survey” [Letter] Effects of a Diagnosis-Related Group Payment Reform on Length and Costs of Hospitalization in Sichuan, China: A Synthetic Control Study Perceptions of Risk, Benefit and Trust - A Comparative Assessment Between Healthcare Workers and the General Public Towards 3 Medical Technologies Adherence to Standard Precautions and Associated Factors Among Healthcare Workers at Public and Private Hospitals in Northeast Ethiopia Impacts of DRG-Based Prepayment Reform on the Cost and Quality of Patients with Neurologic Disorders: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Analysis in Beijing, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1