Defining the Patient Acceptable Symptom State Using PROMIS Following Reconstruction of the Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity

Stone R. Streeter, Sophie Kush, Agnes D Cororaton, Jensen K. Henry, Scott Ellis, Matthew S. Conti
{"title":"Defining the Patient Acceptable Symptom State Using PROMIS Following Reconstruction of the Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity","authors":"Stone R. Streeter, Sophie Kush, Agnes D Cororaton, Jensen K. Henry, Scott Ellis, Matthew S. Conti","doi":"10.1177/2473011424S00060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction/Purpose: Although reconstruction of the flexible progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) has been shown to improve patient-reported outcomes (PROs), there is limited data describing postoperative success as defined by patient satisfaction following surgery. Distinct from the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) is a novel PRO measurement that represents the symptom threshold beyond which patients are satisfied with their postoperative outcome. The primary aim of this study was to use Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) scores in combination with anchor questions to define PASS thresholds following reconstruction of the flexible PCFD. A secondary aim was to analyze how patient-specific variables and certain PCFD reconstruction procedures may impact the probability of reaching PASS thresholds. Methods: Using data collected from a foot and ankle orthopedic registry at a large academic institution, 109 patients who underwent reconstruction of a flexible PCFD between February 2019 and March 2021, had preoperative and 2-year postoperative PROMIS PF and PI scores, and 2-year postoperative responses to two PASS anchor questions (the delighted-terrible scale and the satisfied scale) were included in the study. Patients who underwent either a double or triple arthrodesis were excluded. Patient responses to the anchor questions were dichotomized and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed. Using the Youden Index to balance sensitivity and specificity and maximize the area under the curve (AUC), PASS thresholds with 95% confidence intervals were quantified using 2000 bootstrapped iterations. Lastly, multivariable logistic regressions were performed to analyze the influence of patient demographics, preoperative PROMIS scores, and certain PCFD reconstruction procedures on the probability of reaching the PASS thresholds. Results: The PASS threshold for PROMIS PF was found to be 42.6 using both the delighted-terrible and the satisfied scale and 73.4% of patients (80/109) reached the threshold (both AUCs: 0.91) (Table 1). The PASS thresholds for PROMIS PI defined using the delighted-terrible scale and the satisfied scale were 54.5 (AUC: 0.90) and 57.5 (AUC: 0.91), respectively, with 72.5% of patients (79/109) and 81.7% of patients (89/109) meeting the respective thresholds. Neither patient demographics nor specific PCFD reconstruction procedures affected the probability of meeting the PASS thresholds. However, a lower preoperative PROMIS PF score or a higher preoperative PROMIS PI score significantly decreased the probability of achieving the PASS thresholds. Conclusion: Following reconstruction of the flexible PCFD, PASS thresholds for the PROMIS PF and PI domains were found to be lower and higher, respectively, than population norms. This suggests that patients may be satisfied with the outcome of their surgery despite not returning to the population mean. The probability of achieving the PASS thresholds was influenced by both preoperative PROMIS PF and PI scores but not by patient demographics or certain PCFD reconstruction procedures. In addition to guiding future outcomes research, these results may help foot and ankle surgeons optimize treatment for the flexible PCFD and better manage patient expectations.","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"41 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011424S00060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/Purpose: Although reconstruction of the flexible progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) has been shown to improve patient-reported outcomes (PROs), there is limited data describing postoperative success as defined by patient satisfaction following surgery. Distinct from the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) is a novel PRO measurement that represents the symptom threshold beyond which patients are satisfied with their postoperative outcome. The primary aim of this study was to use Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) scores in combination with anchor questions to define PASS thresholds following reconstruction of the flexible PCFD. A secondary aim was to analyze how patient-specific variables and certain PCFD reconstruction procedures may impact the probability of reaching PASS thresholds. Methods: Using data collected from a foot and ankle orthopedic registry at a large academic institution, 109 patients who underwent reconstruction of a flexible PCFD between February 2019 and March 2021, had preoperative and 2-year postoperative PROMIS PF and PI scores, and 2-year postoperative responses to two PASS anchor questions (the delighted-terrible scale and the satisfied scale) were included in the study. Patients who underwent either a double or triple arthrodesis were excluded. Patient responses to the anchor questions were dichotomized and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed. Using the Youden Index to balance sensitivity and specificity and maximize the area under the curve (AUC), PASS thresholds with 95% confidence intervals were quantified using 2000 bootstrapped iterations. Lastly, multivariable logistic regressions were performed to analyze the influence of patient demographics, preoperative PROMIS scores, and certain PCFD reconstruction procedures on the probability of reaching the PASS thresholds. Results: The PASS threshold for PROMIS PF was found to be 42.6 using both the delighted-terrible and the satisfied scale and 73.4% of patients (80/109) reached the threshold (both AUCs: 0.91) (Table 1). The PASS thresholds for PROMIS PI defined using the delighted-terrible scale and the satisfied scale were 54.5 (AUC: 0.90) and 57.5 (AUC: 0.91), respectively, with 72.5% of patients (79/109) and 81.7% of patients (89/109) meeting the respective thresholds. Neither patient demographics nor specific PCFD reconstruction procedures affected the probability of meeting the PASS thresholds. However, a lower preoperative PROMIS PF score or a higher preoperative PROMIS PI score significantly decreased the probability of achieving the PASS thresholds. Conclusion: Following reconstruction of the flexible PCFD, PASS thresholds for the PROMIS PF and PI domains were found to be lower and higher, respectively, than population norms. This suggests that patients may be satisfied with the outcome of their surgery despite not returning to the population mean. The probability of achieving the PASS thresholds was influenced by both preoperative PROMIS PF and PI scores but not by patient demographics or certain PCFD reconstruction procedures. In addition to guiding future outcomes research, these results may help foot and ankle surgeons optimize treatment for the flexible PCFD and better manage patient expectations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 PROMIS 界定进行性塌足畸形再造术后患者可接受的症状状态
导言/目的:虽然对柔性进行性塌足畸形(PCFD)的重建已被证明能改善患者报告的结果(PROs),但描述术后成功(以术后患者满意度来定义)的数据却很有限。与最小临床意义差异(MCID)不同,患者可接受症状状态(PASS)是一种新的患者报告结果测量方法,它代表了患者对术后结果满意度的症状阈值。本研究的主要目的是将患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)的身体功能(PF)和疼痛干扰(PI)评分与锚定问题相结合,定义柔性 PCFD 重建后的 PASS 阈值。另一个目的是分析患者的特定变量和某些 PCFD 重建程序会如何影响达到 PASS 临界值的概率。方法:利用从一家大型学术机构的足踝矫形登记处收集到的数据,研究纳入了 109 名在 2019 年 2 月至 2021 年 3 月期间接受柔性 PCFD 重建术的患者,这些患者术前和术后 2 年的 PROMIS PF 和 PI 得分,以及术后 2 年对两个 PASS 锚定问题(高兴-可怕量表和满意量表)的回答。接受双重或三重关节置换术的患者不包括在内。患者对锚定问题的回答被二分化,并进行了接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线分析。利用尤登指数(Youden Index)来平衡灵敏度和特异性,并最大化曲线下面积(AUC),通过 2000 次引导迭代来量化 PASS 阈值和 95% 置信区间。最后,通过多变量逻辑回归分析了患者人口统计学特征、术前 PROMIS 评分和某些 PCFD 重建程序对达到 PASS 临界值概率的影响。结果:使用 "高兴-可怕 "和 "满意 "两个量表,PROMIS PF 的 PASS 阈值为 42.6,73.4% 的患者(80/109)达到了该阈值(两个 AUC 均为 0.91)(表 1)。使用高兴-可怕量表和满意量表定义的 PROMIS PI PASS 阈值分别为 54.5(AUC:0.90)和 57.5(AUC:0.91),72.5% 的患者(79/109)和 81.7% 的患者(89/109)达到了各自的阈值。患者的人口统计学特征和特定的 PCFD 重建程序都不会影响达到 PASS 临界值的概率。然而,术前 PROMIS PF 评分较低或 PROMIS PI 评分较高会显著降低达到 PASS 临界值的概率。结论在进行柔性 PCFD 重建后,PROMIS PF 和 PI 领域的 PASS 临界值分别低于和高于人群标准。这表明,尽管没有恢复到人群平均水平,但患者可能对手术结果感到满意。达到 PASS 临界值的概率受术前 PROMIS PF 和 PI 评分的影响,但不受患者人口统计学或某些 PCFD 重建手术的影响。除了指导未来的结果研究外,这些结果还能帮助足踝外科医生优化柔性 PCFD 的治疗并更好地管理患者的期望值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1152
期刊最新文献
3D Analysis of Metatarsal Torsion by Computed Tomography in Normal, Hallux Valgus, and Hallux Rigidus Feet. A Retrospective Case Series of Single-Screw vs Dual-Screw Fixation for Treatment of Medial Malleolus Fractures. Long-term Outcomes After Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. Reduction Quality in Posterior Malleolar Fractures Using a Modified Posteromedial Ankle Approach. Influence of Social Deprivation on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Foot and Ankle Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1