Health Fluctuations in Dementia and its Impact on the Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life Using the EQ-5D-5L

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS Value in Health Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2024.04.010
{"title":"Health Fluctuations in Dementia and its Impact on the Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life Using the EQ-5D-5L","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2024.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To quantify health fluctuations, identify affected health-related quality of life (HRQoL) dimensions, and evaluate if fluctuations affect the HRQoL instruments recall period adherence in people living with dementia (PlwD).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Caregivers of PlwD completed a daily diary for 14 days, documenting if PlwD’s health was better or worse than the day before and the affected HRQoL dimensions. Health fluctuation was categorized into low (0-4 fluctuations in 14 days), moderate (5-8), and high (9-14). Also, caregivers and PlwD completed the EQ-5D-5L (proxy- and self-reported) on days 1, 7, and 14. Subsequently, caregivers were interviewed to determine whether recurrent fluctuations were considered in the EQ-5D-5L assessment of today’s health (recall period adherence).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fluctuations were reported for 96% of PlwD, on average, for 7 of the 14 days. Dimensions most frequently triggering fluctuations included memory, mobility, concentration, sleep, pain, and usual activities. Fluctuations were associated with higher EQ-5D-5L health-states variation and nonadherence to the EQ-5D-5L recall period “today.” PlwD with moderate to high fluctuation had the highest EQ-5D-5L utility change between day 1 and 14 (0.157 and 0.134) and recall period nonadherence (31% and 26%) compared with PlwD with low fluctuation (0.010; 17%). Recall period nonadherence was higher in PlwD with improved compared with those with deteriorated health in the diary (37% vs 9%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Health fluctuations frequently occur in dementia and strongly affect HRQoL assessments. Further research is needed to evaluate if more extended recall periods and multiple, consecutive assessments could capture health fluctuations more appropriately in dementia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":"27 8","pages":"Pages 1092-1099"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301524023428/pdfft?md5=b32743f1c93ee5cfb36816ffebf1bf17&pid=1-s2.0-S1098301524023428-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301524023428","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To quantify health fluctuations, identify affected health-related quality of life (HRQoL) dimensions, and evaluate if fluctuations affect the HRQoL instruments recall period adherence in people living with dementia (PlwD).

Methods

Caregivers of PlwD completed a daily diary for 14 days, documenting if PlwD’s health was better or worse than the day before and the affected HRQoL dimensions. Health fluctuation was categorized into low (0-4 fluctuations in 14 days), moderate (5-8), and high (9-14). Also, caregivers and PlwD completed the EQ-5D-5L (proxy- and self-reported) on days 1, 7, and 14. Subsequently, caregivers were interviewed to determine whether recurrent fluctuations were considered in the EQ-5D-5L assessment of today’s health (recall period adherence).

Results

Fluctuations were reported for 96% of PlwD, on average, for 7 of the 14 days. Dimensions most frequently triggering fluctuations included memory, mobility, concentration, sleep, pain, and usual activities. Fluctuations were associated with higher EQ-5D-5L health-states variation and nonadherence to the EQ-5D-5L recall period “today.” PlwD with moderate to high fluctuation had the highest EQ-5D-5L utility change between day 1 and 14 (0.157 and 0.134) and recall period nonadherence (31% and 26%) compared with PlwD with low fluctuation (0.010; 17%). Recall period nonadherence was higher in PlwD with improved compared with those with deteriorated health in the diary (37% vs 9%).

Conclusions

Health fluctuations frequently occur in dementia and strongly affect HRQoL assessments. Further research is needed to evaluate if more extended recall periods and multiple, consecutive assessments could capture health fluctuations more appropriately in dementia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痴呆症患者的健康波动及其对使用 EQ-5D-5L 评估健康相关生活质量的影响。
方法痴呆症患者(PlwD)的护理人员填写为期 14 天的每日日记,记录痴呆症患者的健康状况与前一天相比是好是坏以及受影响的 HRQoL 维度。健康波动分为低度(14 天内波动 0-4 次)、中度(5-8 次)和高度(9-14 次)。此外,护理人员和 PlwD 在第 1、7 和 14 天填写了 EQ-5D-5L(代理和自我报告)。随后,护理人员接受了访谈,以确定在 EQ-5D-5L 评估当今健康状况时是否考虑了反复波动(回忆期坚持)。最常引发波动的因素包括记忆力、活动能力、注意力、睡眠、疼痛和日常活动。波动与较高的 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态变化和不遵守 EQ-5D-5L "今天 "回忆期有关。与波动性低的 PlwD(0.010;17%)相比,波动性中高的 PlwD 在第 1 天和第 14 天之间的 EQ-5D-5L 效用变化(0.157 和 0.134)和回顾期不坚持率(31% 和 26%)最高。与日记中健康状况恶化的患者相比,健康状况改善的 PlwD 患者在回忆期间不坚持治疗的比例更高(37% vs 9%)。还需要进一步研究,以评估更长的回忆期和多次连续评估是否能更恰当地捕捉到痴呆症患者的健康波动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
期刊最新文献
Value Attribution for Combination Treatments: Two Potential Solutions for an Insoluble Problem. Evaluating the health and economic impacts of return-to-work interventions: a modelling study. Exploring social preferences for health and wellbeing across the digital divide. A qualitative investigation based on tasks taken from an online discrete choice experiment. Quantifying low-value care in Germany: An observational study using statutory health insurance data from 2018 to 2021. Indirect Costs of Alzheimer's Disease: Unpaid Caregiver Burden and Patient Productivity Loss.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1