Validating Health Economic Models With the Probabilistic Analysis Check dashBOARD

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS Value in Health Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2024.04.008
{"title":"Validating Health Economic Models With the Probabilistic Analysis Check dashBOARD","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2024.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Health economic (HE) models are often considered as “black boxes” because they are not publicly available and lack transparency, which prevents independent scrutiny of HE models. Additionally, validation efforts and validation status of HE models are not systematically reported. Methods to validate HE models in absence of their full underlying code are therefore urgently needed to improve health policy making.</p><p>This study aimed to develop and test a generic dashboard to systematically explore the workings of HE models and validate their model parameters and outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Probabilistic Analysis Check dashBOARD (PACBOARD) was developed using insights from literature, health economists, and a data scientist.</p><p>Functionalities of PACBOARD are (1) exploring and validating model parameters and outcomes using standardized validation tests and interactive plots, (2) visualizing and investigating the relationship between model parameters and outcomes using metamodeling, and (3) predicting HE outcomes using the fitted metamodel.</p><p>To test PACBOARD, 2 mock HE models were developed, and errors were introduced in these models, eg, negative costs inputs, utility values exceeding 1. PACBOARD metamodeling predictions of incremental net monetary benefit were validated against the original model’s outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>PACBOARD automatically identified all errors introduced in the erroneous HE models. Metamodel predictions were accurate compared with the original model outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PACBOARD is a unique dashboard aiming at improving the feasibility and transparency of validation efforts of HE models. PACBOARD allows users to explore the working of HE models using metamodeling based on HE models’ parameters and outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301524023404/pdfft?md5=41158b0742362657a09711b19c7d14aa&pid=1-s2.0-S1098301524023404-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301524023404","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Health economic (HE) models are often considered as “black boxes” because they are not publicly available and lack transparency, which prevents independent scrutiny of HE models. Additionally, validation efforts and validation status of HE models are not systematically reported. Methods to validate HE models in absence of their full underlying code are therefore urgently needed to improve health policy making.

This study aimed to develop and test a generic dashboard to systematically explore the workings of HE models and validate their model parameters and outcomes.

Methods

The Probabilistic Analysis Check dashBOARD (PACBOARD) was developed using insights from literature, health economists, and a data scientist.

Functionalities of PACBOARD are (1) exploring and validating model parameters and outcomes using standardized validation tests and interactive plots, (2) visualizing and investigating the relationship between model parameters and outcomes using metamodeling, and (3) predicting HE outcomes using the fitted metamodel.

To test PACBOARD, 2 mock HE models were developed, and errors were introduced in these models, eg, negative costs inputs, utility values exceeding 1. PACBOARD metamodeling predictions of incremental net monetary benefit were validated against the original model’s outcomes.

Results

PACBOARD automatically identified all errors introduced in the erroneous HE models. Metamodel predictions were accurate compared with the original model outcomes.

Conclusions

PACBOARD is a unique dashboard aiming at improving the feasibility and transparency of validation efforts of HE models. PACBOARD allows users to explore the working of HE models using metamodeling based on HE models’ parameters and outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用概率分析检查 dashBOARD (PACBOARD) 验证卫生经济模型。
目标健康经济(HE)模型通常被认为是 "黑箱",因为它们不公开,缺乏透明度,这妨碍了对 HE 模型的独立审查。此外,也没有系统地报告健康经济模型的验证工作和验证状态。本研究旨在开发和测试一个通用的仪表盘,以系统地探索 HE 模型的工作原理,并验证其模型参数和结果。PACBOARD 的功能包括:(1)使用标准化验证测试和交互式图表探索并验证模型参数和结果;(2)使用元模型可视化并研究模型参数和结果之间的关系;(3)使用拟合的元模型预测医疗结果。为了测试 PACBOARD,开发了 2 个模拟医疗模型,并在这些模型中引入了错误,例如负成本输入、效用值超过 1。结果 PACBOARD 自动识别了错误 HE 模型中引入的所有错误。与原始模型结果相比,元模型预测结果准确无误。结论 PACBOARD 是一个独特的仪表板,旨在提高高等教育模型验证工作的可行性和透明度。PACBOARD 允许用户使用基于 HE 模型参数和结果的元模型来探索 HE 模型的工作情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
期刊最新文献
Analytical Methods for Comparing Uncontrolled Trials with External Controls from Real-World Data: a Systematic Literature Review and Comparison to European Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Practice. Author Reply to "Cost-of/Burden-of-Illness Studies: Steps Backward?" Author Reply. Table of Contents Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1