The Relationship of CHADS2 Score with In-stent Restenosis in Patients Undergoing Iliac Artery Stenting

Gokhan Demirci, A. Şahin, Mehmet Altunova, T. Aktemur, M. Tekin, Mustafa Yıldız, Mehmet Ertürk
{"title":"The Relationship of CHADS2 Score with In-stent Restenosis in Patients Undergoing Iliac Artery Stenting","authors":"Gokhan Demirci, A. Şahin, Mehmet Altunova, T. Aktemur, M. Tekin, Mustafa Yıldız, Mehmet Ertürk","doi":"10.51645/khj.2023.416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Percutaneous intervention to aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) is an approved choice of treatment instead of open surgery. However, despite improvement stent technology, in-stent restenosis (ISR) still remains a potential problem, especially in long-term follow-up of these patients. CHADS2 score is mainly a risk stratification tool for atrial fibrillation; however, it is found to be associated with the severity of atherosclerosis and worse outcome of percutaneous interventions. Thus, we aimed to interrogate the relationship between CHADS2 score and ISR in patients with stent implantation for AIOD.\n Methods: This was a retrospective, observational study that included 419 consecutive patients who had successful common iliac artery (CIA) and external iliac artery stent implantation. Post-procedural ISR is evaluated by either ultrasonography or angiography for each patient in the follow-up period. Patients were then divided into two groups ISR (+) and ISR (–). CHADS2 score was calculated for every patient.\n Results: ISR was detected in 47 out of 419 patients. Patients who had ISR had smaller stent diameter (8.4±0.9 vs. 7.2±2.8, p=0.005) and longer stent length (80 [59–120] mm vs. 59 [39–100] mm, p<0.001) than those without ISR. CHADS2 score was significantly found increased in patients with ISR than those without ISR (2.04 ± 0.98 vs. 1.45±0.93, p<0.001). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (hazard ratios [HR]: 2.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.535–5.293, p=0.001), CHADS2 score (HR: 1.571, 95% CI: 1.186–2.081, p=0.002), and decreased stent diameter (HR: 0.582, 95% CI: 0.366–0.926, p=0.022) were found to be independently associated with ISR.\n Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that COPD, CHADS2 score, and stent diameter were associated with ISR for patients who had successful iliac artery stent implantation. According to our study, this simple and applicable scoring system can be used to predict patients at high risk for ISR.","PeriodicalId":239985,"journal":{"name":"Koşuyolu Heart Journal","volume":"80 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koşuyolu Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51645/khj.2023.416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Percutaneous intervention to aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) is an approved choice of treatment instead of open surgery. However, despite improvement stent technology, in-stent restenosis (ISR) still remains a potential problem, especially in long-term follow-up of these patients. CHADS2 score is mainly a risk stratification tool for atrial fibrillation; however, it is found to be associated with the severity of atherosclerosis and worse outcome of percutaneous interventions. Thus, we aimed to interrogate the relationship between CHADS2 score and ISR in patients with stent implantation for AIOD. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational study that included 419 consecutive patients who had successful common iliac artery (CIA) and external iliac artery stent implantation. Post-procedural ISR is evaluated by either ultrasonography or angiography for each patient in the follow-up period. Patients were then divided into two groups ISR (+) and ISR (–). CHADS2 score was calculated for every patient. Results: ISR was detected in 47 out of 419 patients. Patients who had ISR had smaller stent diameter (8.4±0.9 vs. 7.2±2.8, p=0.005) and longer stent length (80 [59–120] mm vs. 59 [39–100] mm, p<0.001) than those without ISR. CHADS2 score was significantly found increased in patients with ISR than those without ISR (2.04 ± 0.98 vs. 1.45±0.93, p<0.001). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (hazard ratios [HR]: 2.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.535–5.293, p=0.001), CHADS2 score (HR: 1.571, 95% CI: 1.186–2.081, p=0.002), and decreased stent diameter (HR: 0.582, 95% CI: 0.366–0.926, p=0.022) were found to be independently associated with ISR. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that COPD, CHADS2 score, and stent diameter were associated with ISR for patients who had successful iliac artery stent implantation. According to our study, this simple and applicable scoring system can be used to predict patients at high risk for ISR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髂动脉支架植入术患者的 CHADS2 评分与支架内再狭窄的关系
目的:经皮介入治疗主动脉髂闭塞性疾病(AIOD)是取代开腹手术的公认治疗方法。然而,尽管支架技术不断进步,支架内再狭窄(ISR)仍然是一个潜在的问题,尤其是在这些患者的长期随访中。CHADS2 评分主要是对心房颤动进行风险分层的工具,但研究发现它与动脉粥样硬化的严重程度和经皮介入治疗的较差结果有关。因此,我们旨在研究因心房颤动而植入支架的患者的 CHADS2 评分与 ISR 之间的关系。方法:这是一项回顾性观察研究,共纳入了 419 名成功植入髂总动脉(CIA)和髂外动脉支架的连续患者。在随访期间,通过超声波或血管造影术对每位患者的术后 ISR 进行评估。然后将患者分为 ISR(+)和 ISR(-)两组。计算每位患者的 CHADS2 评分。结果在 419 例患者中,有 47 例检测到 ISR。与无 ISR 的患者相比,有 ISR 的患者支架直径较小(8.4±0.9 vs. 7.2±2.8,p=0.005),支架长度较长(80 [59-120] mm vs. 59 [39-100] mm,p<0.001)。ISR患者的CHADS2评分明显高于无ISR患者(2.04±0.98 vs. 1.45±0.93,P<0.001)。慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)(危险比 [HR]:2.85,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.535-5.293):发现慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)(危险比 [HR]:2.85,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.535-5.293,p=0.001)、CHADS2 评分(HR:1.571,95% CI:1.186-2.081,p=0.002)和支架直径减小(HR:0.582,95% CI:0.366-0.926,p=0.022)与 ISR 独立相关。结论我们的研究表明,对于成功植入髂动脉支架的患者,慢性阻塞性肺病、CHADS2 评分和支架直径与 ISR 相关。根据我们的研究,这一简单适用的评分系统可用于预测 ISR 高风险患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predictive Value of Post-operative Cardiac Troponin I and Lactate Levels After Ventricular Septal Defect Closure Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life Following TEVAR with or without Revascularization of the Left Subclavian Artery Distal Versus Proximal Radial Intervention; Is It Really Worth of It? What Did the Latest Updated Pulmonary Hypertension Guide Bring? Current Position and Future Perspectives of Melatonin and Its Supplements in Pulmonary Hypertension
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1