Ultrasound Viscosity Imaging in Breast Lesions: A Multicenter Prospective Study

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2024.03.017
{"title":"Ultrasound Viscosity Imaging in Breast Lesions: A Multicenter Prospective Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.03.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>To explore and validate the clinical value of ultrasound (US) viscosity imaging in differentiating breast lesions<span> by combining with BI-RADS, and then comparing the diagnostic performances with BI-RADS alone.</span></div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This multicenter, prospective study enrolled participants with breast lesions from June 2021 to November 2022. A development cohort (DC) and validation cohort (VC) were established. Using histological results as reference standard, the viscosity-related parameter with the highest area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was selected as the optimal one. Then the original BI-RADS would upgrade or not based on the value of this parameter. Finally, the results were validated in the VC and total cohorts. In the DC, VC and total cohorts, all breast lesions were divided into the large lesion, small lesion and overall groups respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 639 participants (mean age, 46 years ± 14) with 639 breast lesions (372 benign and 267 malignant lesions) were finally enrolled in this study including 392 participants in the DC and 247 in the VC. In the DC, the optimal viscosity-related parameter in differentiating breast lesions was calculated to be A′-S2-Vmax, with the AUC of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.91). Using &gt; 9.97 Pa.s as the cutoff value, the BI-RADS was then modified. The AUC of modified BI-RADS significantly increased from 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.88) to 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.93), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.89) to 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.93) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.87) to 0.90 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.92) in the DC, VC and total cohorts respectively (<em>P</em> &lt; .05 for all).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The quantitative viscous parameters evaluated by US viscosity imaging contribute to breast cancer diagnosis when combined with BI-RADS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633224001594","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives

To explore and validate the clinical value of ultrasound (US) viscosity imaging in differentiating breast lesions by combining with BI-RADS, and then comparing the diagnostic performances with BI-RADS alone.

Materials and Methods

This multicenter, prospective study enrolled participants with breast lesions from June 2021 to November 2022. A development cohort (DC) and validation cohort (VC) were established. Using histological results as reference standard, the viscosity-related parameter with the highest area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was selected as the optimal one. Then the original BI-RADS would upgrade or not based on the value of this parameter. Finally, the results were validated in the VC and total cohorts. In the DC, VC and total cohorts, all breast lesions were divided into the large lesion, small lesion and overall groups respectively.

Results

A total of 639 participants (mean age, 46 years ± 14) with 639 breast lesions (372 benign and 267 malignant lesions) were finally enrolled in this study including 392 participants in the DC and 247 in the VC. In the DC, the optimal viscosity-related parameter in differentiating breast lesions was calculated to be A′-S2-Vmax, with the AUC of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.91). Using > 9.97 Pa.s as the cutoff value, the BI-RADS was then modified. The AUC of modified BI-RADS significantly increased from 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.88) to 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.93), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.89) to 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.93) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.87) to 0.90 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.92) in the DC, VC and total cohorts respectively (P < .05 for all).

Conclusion

The quantitative viscous parameters evaluated by US viscosity imaging contribute to breast cancer diagnosis when combined with BI-RADS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺病变的超声粘度成像:多中心前瞻性研究
理论依据和研究目的探讨并验证超声(US)粘度成像与 BI-RADS 相结合在鉴别乳腺病变方面的临床价值,然后比较其与 BI-RADS 单独诊断的性能。建立了开发队列(DC)和验证队列(VC)。以组织学结果为参考标准,选择接收者操作曲线下面积(AUC)最大的粘度相关参数作为最优参数。然后,原 BI-RADS 将根据该参数值进行升级或不升级。最后,在 VC 和总队列中对结果进行了验证。结果 共有 639 人(平均年龄 46 岁 ± 14 岁)的 639 个乳腺病灶(372 个良性病灶和 267 个恶性病灶)被纳入本研究,其中 392 人参与了直肠癌研究,247 人参与了直肠癌研究。在 DC 中,计算得出区分乳腺病变的最佳粘度相关参数为 A′-S2-Vmax,AUC 为 0.88(95% CI:0.84,0.91)。以 > 9.97 Pa.s 为临界值,对 BI-RADS 进行了修改。修正后的 BI-RADS 的 AUC 从 0.85(95% CI:0.81,0.88)显著增加到 0.91(95% CI:0.87,0.93),0.85(95% CI:0.80,0.89)增加到 0.90(95% CI:0.85,0.93),0.85(95% CI:0.82,0.87)增加到 0.90(95% CI:0.结论 US 粘度成像评估的定量粘度参数结合 BI-RADS 有助于乳腺癌诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Impact of Radiologist's Alert System on Patient Care for High-risk Incidental CT Findings: A Machine Learning-Based Risk Factor Analysis. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Radiomics of Axial and Sagittal Orientation in Pregnant Patients with Suspected Placenta Accreta Spectrum. Navigating a Radiology Conference: A Comprehensive Guide for Learners. Radiomics Combined with ACR TI-RADS for Thyroid Nodules: Diagnostic Performance, Unnecessary Biopsy Rate, and Nomogram Construction. The association between FLAIR vascular hyperintensities and outcomes in patients with border zone infarcts treated with medical therapy may vary with the infarct subtype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1