Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Leptomeningeal Disease Following Receipt of EGFR-Targeted Therapy, Immune-Checkpoint Blockade, Intrathecal Chemotherapy, or Radiation Therapy Alone

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical lung cancer Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cllc.2024.04.005
Matthew N. Mills , Akihiro Uno , Pinxue Li , Casey Liveringhouse , Youngchul Kim , Daniel E. Oliver , Bradford A. Perez , Benjamin C. Creelan , Michael Yu , Peter A. Forsyth , Yolanda Pina , Kamran A. Ahmed
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Leptomeningeal Disease Following Receipt of EGFR-Targeted Therapy, Immune-Checkpoint Blockade, Intrathecal Chemotherapy, or Radiation Therapy Alone","authors":"Matthew N. Mills ,&nbsp;Akihiro Uno ,&nbsp;Pinxue Li ,&nbsp;Casey Liveringhouse ,&nbsp;Youngchul Kim ,&nbsp;Daniel E. Oliver ,&nbsp;Bradford A. Perez ,&nbsp;Benjamin C. Creelan ,&nbsp;Michael Yu ,&nbsp;Peter A. Forsyth ,&nbsp;Yolanda Pina ,&nbsp;Kamran A. Ahmed","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2024.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>EGFR-targeted therapy (ETT) and immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) have shown promising results in treating NSCLC brain metastases (BM). However, little is known of their effect in treating leptomeningeal disease (LMD).</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective review of 80 patients diagnosed with NSCLC LMD from January 2014 to March 2021. Patients were grouped based on initial LMD treatment: radiotherapy (RT) alone, ETT, ICB, and intrathecal chemotherapy (ITC).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>EGFR mutation was present in 22 patients (28%). Twenty patients had positive cytology in cerebrospinal fluid, while 60 patients were diagnosed based on MRI with clinical correlation. The RT alone group consisted primarily of whole brain radiation (<em>n =</em> 20; 77%), stereotactic radiation (<em>n =</em> 3; 12%), and palliative spine radiation (<em>n =</em> 2; 7%). There were no significant differences amongst the treatment groups in age, performance status, or neurologic symptoms. Overall, the 6-month overall survival (OS) and craniospinal progression free survival (CS-PFS) were 35% and 24%, respectively. The 6-month OS for the ETT, ICB, ITC, and RT alone groups was 64%, 33%, 57%, and 29% respectively (log-rank <em>P</em> = .026). The 6-month CS-PFS for the ETT, ICB, ITC, and RT alone groups was 43%, 33%, 29%, and 19% respectively (log-rank <em>P</em> = .049). Upon univariate analysis, receipt of ETT compared to RT alone reached significance for OS (HR 0.35, <em>P</em> = .006) and CS-PFS (HR 0.39, <em>P</em> = .013).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The prognosis for patients with NSCLC LMD remains poor overall. However, the receipt of ETT for patients with EGFR-positive disease was associated with improved outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730424000482","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

EGFR-targeted therapy (ETT) and immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) have shown promising results in treating NSCLC brain metastases (BM). However, little is known of their effect in treating leptomeningeal disease (LMD).

Patients and Methods

This is a retrospective review of 80 patients diagnosed with NSCLC LMD from January 2014 to March 2021. Patients were grouped based on initial LMD treatment: radiotherapy (RT) alone, ETT, ICB, and intrathecal chemotherapy (ITC).

Results

EGFR mutation was present in 22 patients (28%). Twenty patients had positive cytology in cerebrospinal fluid, while 60 patients were diagnosed based on MRI with clinical correlation. The RT alone group consisted primarily of whole brain radiation (n = 20; 77%), stereotactic radiation (n = 3; 12%), and palliative spine radiation (n = 2; 7%). There were no significant differences amongst the treatment groups in age, performance status, or neurologic symptoms. Overall, the 6-month overall survival (OS) and craniospinal progression free survival (CS-PFS) were 35% and 24%, respectively. The 6-month OS for the ETT, ICB, ITC, and RT alone groups was 64%, 33%, 57%, and 29% respectively (log-rank P = .026). The 6-month CS-PFS for the ETT, ICB, ITC, and RT alone groups was 43%, 33%, 29%, and 19% respectively (log-rank P = .049). Upon univariate analysis, receipt of ETT compared to RT alone reached significance for OS (HR 0.35, P = .006) and CS-PFS (HR 0.39, P = .013).

Conclusions

The prognosis for patients with NSCLC LMD remains poor overall. However, the receipt of ETT for patients with EGFR-positive disease was associated with improved outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非小细胞肺癌胸膜疾病患者接受表皮生长因子受体靶向疗法、免疫检查点阻断疗法、鞘内化疗或单纯放疗后的临床疗效
背景EGFR靶向疗法(ETT)和免疫检查点阻断疗法(ICB)在治疗NSCLC脑转移瘤(BM)方面取得了可喜的成果。患者和方法这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是2014年1月至2021年3月期间确诊为NSCLC LMD的80例患者。患者根据最初的LMD治疗分组:单纯放疗(RT)、ETT、ICB和鞘内化疗(ITC)。20例患者脑脊液细胞学检查呈阳性,60例患者根据核磁共振成像和临床相关性确诊。单纯 RT 组主要包括全脑放射(20 人;77%)、立体定向放射(3 人;12%)和脊柱姑息放射(2 人;7%)。各治疗组在年龄、表现状态或神经系统症状方面无明显差异。总体而言,6 个月总生存期(OS)和颅骨无进展生存期(CS-PFS)分别为 35% 和 24%。ETT组、ICB组、ITC组和单纯RT组的6个月OS分别为64%、33%、57%和29%(log-rank P = .026)。ETT组、ICB组、ITC组和单纯RT组的6个月CS-PFS分别为43%、33%、29%和19%(对数秩P = .049)。经单变量分析,与单纯 RT 相比,接受 ETT 对 OS(HR 0.35,P = .006)和 CS-PFS (HR 0.39,P = .013)具有显著性意义。然而,表皮生长因子受体阳性患者接受 ETT 治疗可改善预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical lung cancer
Clinical lung cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
159
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lung Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lung cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
期刊最新文献
A Phase I Open-Label Study of Cediranib Plus Etoposide and Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy for Patients With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer or Metastatic Neuroendocrine Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Identification and Treatment of Lung Cancer Oncogenic Drivers in a Diverse Safety Net Setting Understanding the Social Risk Factors That Avert Equitable Lung Cancer Care Response to Editor: Commentary on “Influence of Tumor Cavitation on Assessing the Clinical Benefit of Anti-PD1 or PD-L1 Inhibitors in Advanced Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma” Letter to the Editor in Response to “Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening in a Centralized Academic Program”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1