Patterns and outcomes of acute toxicological cases before, during, and after COVID-19 lockdown in Sohag University hospitals, Egypt.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY Toxicology Research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1093/toxres/tfae061
Meray Medhat Shokry Zaghary, Mai M Abd ElKader, Rasha Elhaddad Ali Mousa, Ahmed M Said
{"title":"Patterns and outcomes of acute toxicological cases before, during, and after COVID-19 lockdown in Sohag University hospitals, Egypt.","authors":"Meray Medhat Shokry Zaghary, Mai M Abd ElKader, Rasha Elhaddad Ali Mousa, Ahmed M Said","doi":"10.1093/toxres/tfae061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nToxicologists manage poisoning by preventing, detecting, and treating it, which requires continuous data collection and analysis of toxicological hazards.\n\n\nAim of the work\nThe study aims to report and compare the pattern and outcome of acute toxicological cases admitted to Sohag University Hospitals during the COVID-19 lockdown (2020-2021) with the year before (2019) and the year after (2022).\n\n\nMethods\nThis comparative study reviewed the sociodemographic and clinical data in the medical records. The study showed that Sohag University Hospitals received 670 toxicological cases between 2019 and 2022; 105 cases in 2019, 347 cases in 2020-2021, and 218 cases in 2022.\n\n\nResults\nMost of patients were below seven years with no sex differences. Accidental poisoning was the most frequent toxicity. The oral route was the most common in the three studied periods. During the lockdown, metal phosphide was the most frequent (19.0%), while therapeutic agents were the most reported after the lockdown (23.9%). The delay time showed a significant difference between the studied periods (p-value < 0.001). In the three studied periods, complete recovery was achieved in more than 70% of cases; however, the mortality rate and the rate of complications during the lockdown period (10.4% and 9.5%, respectively) were almost twice those of the year before and the year after the pandemic with significant odds ratio of mortality during pandemic (OR) 0.07 CI 95% (0.02, 0.11).\n\n\nConclusion\nThe pandemic had a bad impact on outcomes as showed the highest percentage of mortality compared to before and after COVID-19 periods.","PeriodicalId":105,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxres/tfae061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Toxicologists manage poisoning by preventing, detecting, and treating it, which requires continuous data collection and analysis of toxicological hazards. Aim of the work The study aims to report and compare the pattern and outcome of acute toxicological cases admitted to Sohag University Hospitals during the COVID-19 lockdown (2020-2021) with the year before (2019) and the year after (2022). Methods This comparative study reviewed the sociodemographic and clinical data in the medical records. The study showed that Sohag University Hospitals received 670 toxicological cases between 2019 and 2022; 105 cases in 2019, 347 cases in 2020-2021, and 218 cases in 2022. Results Most of patients were below seven years with no sex differences. Accidental poisoning was the most frequent toxicity. The oral route was the most common in the three studied periods. During the lockdown, metal phosphide was the most frequent (19.0%), while therapeutic agents were the most reported after the lockdown (23.9%). The delay time showed a significant difference between the studied periods (p-value < 0.001). In the three studied periods, complete recovery was achieved in more than 70% of cases; however, the mortality rate and the rate of complications during the lockdown period (10.4% and 9.5%, respectively) were almost twice those of the year before and the year after the pandemic with significant odds ratio of mortality during pandemic (OR) 0.07 CI 95% (0.02, 0.11). Conclusion The pandemic had a bad impact on outcomes as showed the highest percentage of mortality compared to before and after COVID-19 periods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃及索哈格大学医院在 COVID-19 封锁之前、期间和之后的急性中毒病例模式和结果。
背景毒理学家通过预防、检测和治疗中毒来管理中毒,这需要持续收集和分析毒物危害的数据。研究旨在报告和比较 COVID-19 封锁期间(2020-2021 年)与前一年(2019 年)和后一年(2022 年)索哈格大学医院收治的急性中毒病例的模式和结果。研究显示,2019 年至 2022 年期间,苏哈格大学医院共接收了 670 例中毒病例;其中 2019 年 105 例,2020-2021 年 347 例,2022 年 218 例。意外中毒是最常见的中毒。在三个研究期间,口服途径最为常见。在封锁期间,金属磷化物中毒最为常见(19.0%),而在封锁之后,治疗剂中毒报告最多(23.9%)。研究期间的延迟时间有明显差异(p 值小于 0.001)。在三个研究期间,超过 70% 的病例完全康复;然而,封锁期间的死亡率和并发症发生率(分别为 10.4% 和 9.5%)几乎是大流行前一年和后一年的两倍,大流行期间死亡率的显著几率比(OR)为 0.07 CI 95% (0.02, 0.11)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Toxicology Research
Toxicology Research TOXICOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: A multi-disciplinary journal covering the best research in both fundamental and applied aspects of toxicology
期刊最新文献
Design and computational analysis of a novel Azurin-BR2 chimeric protein against breast cancer. Synergistic effect of curcumin and Piperine loaded Niosomal nanoparticles on acute pulmonary toxicity induced by Paraquat in mice. Upregulation of ACSL, ND75, Vha26 and sesB genes by antiepileptic drugs resulted in genotoxicity in drosophila. Potential protective role of chlorogenic acid against cyclophosphamide-induced reproductive damage in male mice. The cliff-edge of toxicological concern: highlighting the potential issues of an over-reliance on "less-than-lifetime" thresholds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1