Sunil Patel MD, PhD , Philip P. Storey MD , Mark R. Barakat MD , Vrinda Hershberger MD , William Z. Bridges Jr. MD , David A. Eichenbaum MD , David R. Lally MD, PhD , David S. Boyer MD , Sophie J. Bakri MD , Monica Roy OD, MPH , Dario A. Paggiarino MD
{"title":"Phase I DAVIO Trial: EYP-1901 Bioerodible, Sustained-Delivery Vorolanib Insert in Patients With Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration","authors":"Sunil Patel MD, PhD , Philip P. Storey MD , Mark R. Barakat MD , Vrinda Hershberger MD , William Z. Bridges Jr. MD , David A. Eichenbaum MD , David R. Lally MD, PhD , David S. Boyer MD , Sophie J. Bakri MD , Monica Roy OD, MPH , Dario A. Paggiarino MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xops.2024.100527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate safety and tolerability of EYP-1901, an intravitreal insert containing vorolanib, a pan–VEGF receptor inhibitor packaged in a bioerodible delivery technology (Durasert E™) for sustained delivery, in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) previously treated with anti-VEGF therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Phase I, multicenter, prospective, open-label, dose-escalation trial.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Patients with wAMD and evidence of prior anti-VEGF therapy response.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients received a single intravitreal injection of EYP-1901.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>The primary objective was to evaluate safety and tolerability of EYP-1901. Secondary objectives assessed biologic activity of EYP-1901 including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST). Exploratory analyses included reduction in anti-VEGF treatment burden and supplemental injection-free rates.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventeen patients enrolled in the 440 μg (3 patients), 1030 μg (1 patient), 2060 μg (8 patients), and 3090 μg (5 patients) dose cohorts. No dose-limiting toxicity, ocular serious adverse events (AEs), or systemic AEs related to EYP-1901 were observed. There was no evidence of ocular or systemic toxicity related to vorolanib or the delivery technology. Moderate ocular treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) included reduced visual acuity (2/17) and retinal exudates (3/17). One patient with reduced BCVA had 3 separate reductions of 17, 18, and 16 letters, and another had a single drop of 25 letters. One severe TEAE, neovascular AMD (i.e., worsening/progressive disease activity), was reported in 1 of 17 study eyes but deemed unrelated to treatment. Mean change from baseline in BCVA was −1.8 letters and −5.4 letters at 6 and 12 months. Mean change from baseline in CST was +1.7 μm and +2.4 μm at 6 and 12 months. Reduction in treatment burden was 74% and 71% at 6 and 12 months. Of 16 study eyes, 13, 8, and 5 were injection-free up to 3, 6, and 12 months.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In the DAVIO trial (<span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg> identifier, NCT04747197), EYP-1901 had a favorable safety profile and was well tolerated in previously treated eyes with wAMD. Measures of biologic activity remained relatively stable following a single EYP-1901 injection. These preliminary data support ongoing phase II and planned phase III trials to assess efficacy and safety.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74363,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524000630/pdfft?md5=9d462f7351a608ab1ac261afc7321547&pid=1-s2.0-S2666914524000630-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524000630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate safety and tolerability of EYP-1901, an intravitreal insert containing vorolanib, a pan–VEGF receptor inhibitor packaged in a bioerodible delivery technology (Durasert E™) for sustained delivery, in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) previously treated with anti-VEGF therapy.
Design
Phase I, multicenter, prospective, open-label, dose-escalation trial.
Participants
Patients with wAMD and evidence of prior anti-VEGF therapy response.
Methods
Patients received a single intravitreal injection of EYP-1901.
Main Outcome Measures
The primary objective was to evaluate safety and tolerability of EYP-1901. Secondary objectives assessed biologic activity of EYP-1901 including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST). Exploratory analyses included reduction in anti-VEGF treatment burden and supplemental injection-free rates.
Results
Seventeen patients enrolled in the 440 μg (3 patients), 1030 μg (1 patient), 2060 μg (8 patients), and 3090 μg (5 patients) dose cohorts. No dose-limiting toxicity, ocular serious adverse events (AEs), or systemic AEs related to EYP-1901 were observed. There was no evidence of ocular or systemic toxicity related to vorolanib or the delivery technology. Moderate ocular treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) included reduced visual acuity (2/17) and retinal exudates (3/17). One patient with reduced BCVA had 3 separate reductions of 17, 18, and 16 letters, and another had a single drop of 25 letters. One severe TEAE, neovascular AMD (i.e., worsening/progressive disease activity), was reported in 1 of 17 study eyes but deemed unrelated to treatment. Mean change from baseline in BCVA was −1.8 letters and −5.4 letters at 6 and 12 months. Mean change from baseline in CST was +1.7 μm and +2.4 μm at 6 and 12 months. Reduction in treatment burden was 74% and 71% at 6 and 12 months. Of 16 study eyes, 13, 8, and 5 were injection-free up to 3, 6, and 12 months.
Conclusion
In the DAVIO trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04747197), EYP-1901 had a favorable safety profile and was well tolerated in previously treated eyes with wAMD. Measures of biologic activity remained relatively stable following a single EYP-1901 injection. These preliminary data support ongoing phase II and planned phase III trials to assess efficacy and safety.
Financial Disclosure(s)
The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.