Effect of vasopressin injection technique on ovarian reserve during laparoscopic cystectomy of ovarian endometriomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Minerva obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05310-1
Saeed Baradwan, M. Alshahrani, Rayan Al Sghan, H. Sabban, Khalid Khadawardi, Nabigah Alzawawi, H. H. Abduljabbar, A. M. Abdelhakim, Abdulhadi A Al Amodi, A. F. Elgamel
{"title":"Effect of vasopressin injection technique on ovarian reserve during laparoscopic cystectomy of ovarian endometriomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Saeed Baradwan, M. Alshahrani, Rayan Al Sghan, H. Sabban, Khalid Khadawardi, Nabigah Alzawawi, H. H. Abduljabbar, A. M. Abdelhakim, Abdulhadi A Al Amodi, A. F. Elgamel","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05310-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nTo evaluate the effect of injecting vasopressin during laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometriomas on ovarian reserve.\n\n\nEVIDENCE ACQUISITION\nFour different databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science) were searched to identify relevant studies in March 2023. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared vasopressin injection in the intervention group versus no injection of vasopressin in the control group among women undergoing laparoscopic cystectomy of ovarian endometriomas. The main outcomes were the amount of bleeding, number of coagulation events, and levels of serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). The available data were extracted and analyzed in a meta-analysis model using RevMan software.\n\n\nEVIDENCE SYNTHESIS\nSeven RCTs, involving a total number of 478 patients, were included in our study. The vasopressin group had significantly reduced blood loss amount and number of coagulation events compared to the control group (P=0.004 and P=0.005). There was a significant improvement in the AMH levels within 6 months after surgery in the vasopressin group (MD=0.52, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.93, P=0.01). In addition, the FSH levels within 6 months after laparoscopic cystectomy were significantly reduced with vasopressin injection.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nVasopressin injection during laparoscopic cystectomy of ovarian endometriomas is effective in reducing blood loss amount and frequency of coagulation, as well as protecting the ovarian reserve. More trials are encouraged to confirm our findings.","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05310-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION To evaluate the effect of injecting vasopressin during laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometriomas on ovarian reserve. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Four different databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science) were searched to identify relevant studies in March 2023. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared vasopressin injection in the intervention group versus no injection of vasopressin in the control group among women undergoing laparoscopic cystectomy of ovarian endometriomas. The main outcomes were the amount of bleeding, number of coagulation events, and levels of serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). The available data were extracted and analyzed in a meta-analysis model using RevMan software. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Seven RCTs, involving a total number of 478 patients, were included in our study. The vasopressin group had significantly reduced blood loss amount and number of coagulation events compared to the control group (P=0.004 and P=0.005). There was a significant improvement in the AMH levels within 6 months after surgery in the vasopressin group (MD=0.52, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.93, P=0.01). In addition, the FSH levels within 6 months after laparoscopic cystectomy were significantly reduced with vasopressin injection. CONCLUSIONS Vasopressin injection during laparoscopic cystectomy of ovarian endometriomas is effective in reducing blood loss amount and frequency of coagulation, as well as protecting the ovarian reserve. More trials are encouraged to confirm our findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜卵巢子宫内膜瘤囊肿切除术中血管加压素注射技术对卵巢储备功能的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
研究目的:评估在腹腔镜卵巢子宫内膜异位症切除术中注射血管加压素对卵巢储备功能的影响。证据获取:检索了四个不同的数据库(PubMed、Cochrane Library、Scopus 和 ISI Web of Science),以确定 2023 年 3 月的相关研究。我们选择了在接受腹腔镜卵巢子宫内膜异位症膀胱切除术的妇女中,比较干预组注射血管加压素与对照组不注射血管加压素的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结果是出血量、凝血事件数量以及血清抗缪勒氏管激素(AMH)和促卵泡激素(FSH)水平。我们的研究共纳入了七项 RCT,涉及患者总数达 478 人。与对照组相比,血管加压素组的失血量和凝血事件数量明显减少(P=0.004 和 P=0.005)。血管加压素组术后6个月内的AMH水平有明显改善(MD=0.52,95% CI:0.11,0.93,P=0.01)。结论 在卵巢子宫内膜异位症腹腔镜膀胱切除术中注射血管加压素能有效减少失血量和凝血频率,保护卵巢储备功能。我们鼓励进行更多试验来证实我们的研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
191
期刊最新文献
Clinical features and their associations with umbilical cord gas abnormalities. Computerized cardiotocography and fetal heart response to maternal coffee intake: a prospective study. New characteristics of polycystic ovary syndrome phenotypes according to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-based study of urinary steroid metabolome. Dysgerminoma of the ovary. Racial and ethnic disparities in non-invasive prenatal testing adherence: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1