Productive cough, a forgotten phenotype of refractory chronic cough

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Respiratory Medicine and Research Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1016/j.resmer.2024.101106
Jenny King , James Wingfield Digby , Sarah Hennessey , Paul Marsden , Jaclyn Smith
{"title":"Productive cough, a forgotten phenotype of refractory chronic cough","authors":"Jenny King ,&nbsp;James Wingfield Digby ,&nbsp;Sarah Hennessey ,&nbsp;Paul Marsden ,&nbsp;Jaclyn Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.resmer.2024.101106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Refractory chronic cough (RCC) patients typically complain of a dry cough. Sputum production in these patients has rarely been described in the literature. However, sputum production in RCC may be common, troublesome and particularly challenging to manage.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>We aimed to characterise patients referred to our regional specialist cough clinic who have significant sputum production (≥1 teaspoon of sputum daily) and compare their demographics, symptomatology and investigation results to those presenting with a dry RCC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective case note analysis of all consecutive referrals to a tertiary cough clinic identified as having a productive cough (≥1 teaspoon of sputum daily) was performed over a 12-month period. They were compared to a paired number of patients with dry RCC.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with productive cough represented nearly a quarter (98/398, 24.6 %) of new patient referrals to the clinic. Demographic information, symptomatology and investigation results were comparable to those with a dry RCC. Over a third, 35.8 % of patients with a productive cough reported expectorating an egg-cupful of sputum or more a day. Nearly half, 40% of those with high volume sputum production (≥egg-cupful daily) had both a normal CT thorax and normal spirometry.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients with RCC can expectorate significant volumes of sputum in the absence of underlying lung disease. This group have similar demographics to those with dry RCC. This is the first piece of work to our knowledge to describe this cohort. Future work needs to acknowledge this forgotten phenotype to ensure that they receive comprehensive evaluation and evidenced based treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48479,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 101106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590041224000229","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Refractory chronic cough (RCC) patients typically complain of a dry cough. Sputum production in these patients has rarely been described in the literature. However, sputum production in RCC may be common, troublesome and particularly challenging to manage.

Aims

We aimed to characterise patients referred to our regional specialist cough clinic who have significant sputum production (≥1 teaspoon of sputum daily) and compare their demographics, symptomatology and investigation results to those presenting with a dry RCC.

Methods

A retrospective case note analysis of all consecutive referrals to a tertiary cough clinic identified as having a productive cough (≥1 teaspoon of sputum daily) was performed over a 12-month period. They were compared to a paired number of patients with dry RCC.

Results

Patients with productive cough represented nearly a quarter (98/398, 24.6 %) of new patient referrals to the clinic. Demographic information, symptomatology and investigation results were comparable to those with a dry RCC. Over a third, 35.8 % of patients with a productive cough reported expectorating an egg-cupful of sputum or more a day. Nearly half, 40% of those with high volume sputum production (≥egg-cupful daily) had both a normal CT thorax and normal spirometry.

Conclusions

Patients with RCC can expectorate significant volumes of sputum in the absence of underlying lung disease. This group have similar demographics to those with dry RCC. This is the first piece of work to our knowledge to describe this cohort. Future work needs to acknowledge this forgotten phenotype to ensure that they receive comprehensive evaluation and evidenced based treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痰多咳嗽--被遗忘的难治性慢性咳嗽表型
背景难治性慢性咳嗽(RCC)患者通常主诉干咳。文献中很少描述这些患者的痰液产生情况。目的我们旨在了解转诊至本地区咳嗽专科门诊的大量痰(每天痰量≥1茶匙)患者的特征,并将其人口统计学、症状学和检查结果与干咳患者进行比较。方法 对一家三级医院咳嗽门诊在 12 个月内所有连续转诊的有痰咳嗽(每天痰量≥1 茶匙)患者进行回顾性病例分析。结果有痰咳嗽患者占新转诊患者的近四分之一(98/398,24.6%)。其人口统计学信息、症状和检查结果与干性 RCC 患者相当。超过三分之一(35.8%)的有痰咳嗽患者表示每天排出鸡蛋杯或更多的痰。近一半的高痰量(每天≥鸡蛋杯)患者(40%)的胸部 CT 和肺活量均正常。这组患者的人口统计学特征与干性 RCC 患者相似。据我们所知,这是第一部描述这一人群的著作。未来的工作需要承认这种被遗忘的表型,以确保他们得到全面的评估和循证治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory Medicine and Research
Respiratory Medicine and Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of convalescent plasma for the treatment of COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients: A multicenter French study. Prognosis of incidental lung cancer in lung transplant candidates. Evaluation of efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with progressive interstitial lung disease (ILD) with inflammatory component (EvER-ILD2): A multicentre double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. Pleural ultrasound for pneumothorax diagnosis after computerised tomography-guided biopsy Physical activity and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A prospective cohort study in UK Biobank and Mendelian randomization analyses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1