Identifying Asian American lung cancer disparities: A novel analytic approach

{"title":"Identifying Asian American lung cancer disparities: A novel analytic approach","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Asian Americans include heterogeneous subpopulations with unique burden as the only racial group with cancer as the leading cause of death. The purpose of the study was to identify differences in clinical stage and survival of patients with lung cancer between Asian Americans and its subgroups relative to other racial groups.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with lung cancer from 2016 National Cancer Database were divided into East Asian, Southeast Asian, South Asian subgroups based on geographic origins, and a composite Asian American group with White non-Hispanic, Black, and Hispanic comparison groups. Columnar <em>z</em> score analysis with adjusted residuals was employed and the terms underrepresented and overrepresented were utilized to describe significant statistical findings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 825,448 patients were analyzed. Asian Americans were underrepresented relative to White non-Hispanics in all clinical stages except IIIB and IV. In clinical stage IV, Asian Americans (51.0%), East Asians (47.2%), Southeast Asians (57.4%), and South Asians (52.2%) were overrepresented relative to White non-Hispanics (42.2%) and Southeast Asians were overrepresented relative to East Asians and South Asians. For survival across all stages, Asian Americans were overrepresented relative to White non-Hispanics and Blacks, but in clinical stage IV, Southeast Asians (17.9%) were underrepresented relative to East Asians (26.0%) and South Asians (26.6%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This is the first study to address lung cancer disparity in Asian American subgroups employing a novel analytical approach. Asian American subgroups demonstrated more advanced lung cancer diagnosis yet higher survival compared with White non-Hispanics, Blacks, and/or Hispanics with differences between subgroups. Interplay of complex factors may contribute to Asian American health disparities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266627362400113X/pdfft?md5=327ca1fe48289ed580cc8782ccb92e52&pid=1-s2.0-S266627362400113X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266627362400113X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Asian Americans include heterogeneous subpopulations with unique burden as the only racial group with cancer as the leading cause of death. The purpose of the study was to identify differences in clinical stage and survival of patients with lung cancer between Asian Americans and its subgroups relative to other racial groups.

Methods

Patients with lung cancer from 2016 National Cancer Database were divided into East Asian, Southeast Asian, South Asian subgroups based on geographic origins, and a composite Asian American group with White non-Hispanic, Black, and Hispanic comparison groups. Columnar z score analysis with adjusted residuals was employed and the terms underrepresented and overrepresented were utilized to describe significant statistical findings.

Results

A total of 825,448 patients were analyzed. Asian Americans were underrepresented relative to White non-Hispanics in all clinical stages except IIIB and IV. In clinical stage IV, Asian Americans (51.0%), East Asians (47.2%), Southeast Asians (57.4%), and South Asians (52.2%) were overrepresented relative to White non-Hispanics (42.2%) and Southeast Asians were overrepresented relative to East Asians and South Asians. For survival across all stages, Asian Americans were overrepresented relative to White non-Hispanics and Blacks, but in clinical stage IV, Southeast Asians (17.9%) were underrepresented relative to East Asians (26.0%) and South Asians (26.6%).

Conclusions

This is the first study to address lung cancer disparity in Asian American subgroups employing a novel analytical approach. Asian American subgroups demonstrated more advanced lung cancer diagnosis yet higher survival compared with White non-Hispanics, Blacks, and/or Hispanics with differences between subgroups. Interplay of complex factors may contribute to Asian American health disparities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别亚裔美国人的肺癌差异:新颖的分析方法
目的美国亚裔包括异质性亚人群,作为唯一以癌症为主要死因的种族群体,他们承受着独特的负担。该研究旨在确定亚裔美国人及其亚群肺癌患者的临床分期和生存率相对于其他种族群体的差异。方法将 2016 年国家癌症数据库中的肺癌患者根据地理来源分为东亚、东南亚、南亚亚群,以及亚裔美国人综合组和非西班牙裔白人、黑人和西班牙裔对比组。采用调整残差的柱状 Z 值分析法,并使用代表性不足和代表性过高两个术语来描述重要的统计结果。与非西班牙裔白人相比,亚裔美国人在除IIIB和IV期以外的所有临床分期中的比例都偏低。在临床 IV 期,相对于非西班牙裔白人(42.2%),亚裔美国人(51.0%)、东亚人(47.2%)、东南亚人(57.4%)和南亚人(52.2%)的比例偏高,而相对于东亚人和南亚人,东南亚人的比例偏高。在所有分期的生存率方面,亚裔美国人相对于非西班牙裔白人和黑人的比例偏高,但在临床IV期,东南亚人(17.9%)相对于东亚人(26.0%)和南亚人(26.6%)的比例偏低。与非西班牙裔白人、黑人和/或西班牙裔美国人相比,亚裔美国人亚群的肺癌诊断较晚,但生存率较高,亚群之间存在差异。各种复杂因素的相互作用可能会导致亚裔美国人的健康差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Discussion to: Salvage lung resection after immunotherapy is feasible and safe Salvage lung resection after immunotherapy is feasible and safe Identifying Asian American lung cancer disparities: A novel analytic approach Discussion to: Identifying lung cancer disparities among Asian Americans: A novel analytic approach Risk factors for thromboembolic events in pediatric patients with ventricular assist devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1