Ultrasonographic and Electrophysiologic Assessment of Ulnar and Median Nerves in Spastic Upper Limbs in Chronic Stroke Patients

Mohamed Salem, Mosalam Ali, Ahmad Osama Hosny, Mohamed Ebrahem Negm, Mohamed Abdelfattah Elsamahy, Iman Ahmed Yassine
{"title":"Ultrasonographic and Electrophysiologic Assessment of Ulnar and Median Nerves in Spastic Upper Limbs in Chronic Stroke Patients","authors":"Mohamed Salem, Mosalam Ali, Ahmad Osama Hosny, Mohamed Ebrahem Negm, Mohamed Abdelfattah Elsamahy, Iman Ahmed Yassine","doi":"10.21608/ejhm.2024.349085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Stroke is the primary cause of long-term disability and mortality among adults and is classified as a chronic illness. After suffering a stroke, spasticity manifests in around thirty percent of cases. Aim: To evaluate the effect of spasticity in chronic hemiplegic upper extremities on electrophysiological and morphological characteristics of the median and ulnar nerves. Subjects and methods: This was cross-sectional research that was performed on 50 patients with chronic stroke at the Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Neurology Department of Suez Canal University Hospitals, Suez Canal University and Ultrasonography Unit, Diagnostic Radiology Department, Ismailia, Egypt, from May 2021 to January 2023. All the patients were subjected to clinical evaluations: (Spasticity evaluation: including Brunnstrom Recovery Stages (BRS) and ultrasonographic measurements. Results: There was a statistically significant positive moderate association among ultrasonographic measures of median nerve (distal) and median nerve (proximal). On the paretic side, motor conduction velocities of the median nerve were significantly delayed (mean±SD) (48.3± 9.5) when compared with the non-paretic side (mean±SD) (54.4± 8.3) and p-value (0.020) demonstrated that there were statistically significant variances. The F-wave latencies of the median nerve were significantly higher on the paretic sides (mean ± SD) (32.2± 5.1) when compared with the non-paretic (mean ± SD) (27.5± 3.9) side, and the p-value (0.011) showed that there were statistically significant differences. Conclusion: We concluded that stroke peripheral nerve cases seem to be influenced electrophysiologically on the paretic side. But according to US measurements, they weren’t affected.","PeriodicalId":22467,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine","volume":"446 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2024.349085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke is the primary cause of long-term disability and mortality among adults and is classified as a chronic illness. After suffering a stroke, spasticity manifests in around thirty percent of cases. Aim: To evaluate the effect of spasticity in chronic hemiplegic upper extremities on electrophysiological and morphological characteristics of the median and ulnar nerves. Subjects and methods: This was cross-sectional research that was performed on 50 patients with chronic stroke at the Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Neurology Department of Suez Canal University Hospitals, Suez Canal University and Ultrasonography Unit, Diagnostic Radiology Department, Ismailia, Egypt, from May 2021 to January 2023. All the patients were subjected to clinical evaluations: (Spasticity evaluation: including Brunnstrom Recovery Stages (BRS) and ultrasonographic measurements. Results: There was a statistically significant positive moderate association among ultrasonographic measures of median nerve (distal) and median nerve (proximal). On the paretic side, motor conduction velocities of the median nerve were significantly delayed (mean±SD) (48.3± 9.5) when compared with the non-paretic side (mean±SD) (54.4± 8.3) and p-value (0.020) demonstrated that there were statistically significant variances. The F-wave latencies of the median nerve were significantly higher on the paretic sides (mean ± SD) (32.2± 5.1) when compared with the non-paretic (mean ± SD) (27.5± 3.9) side, and the p-value (0.011) showed that there were statistically significant differences. Conclusion: We concluded that stroke peripheral nerve cases seem to be influenced electrophysiologically on the paretic side. But according to US measurements, they weren’t affected.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性中风患者痉挛性上肢中尺神经和正中神经的超声和电生理评估
背景:中风是导致成人长期残疾和死亡的主要原因,被归类为慢性疾病。大约 30% 的病例在中风后会出现痉挛。目的:评估慢性偏瘫上肢痉挛对正中神经和尺神经的电生理和形态特征的影响。研究对象和方法:这是一项横断面研究,于 2021 年 5 月至 2023 年 1 月在埃及伊斯梅利亚苏伊士运河大学医院神经内科临床神经生理学室和放射诊断部超声波室对 50 名慢性中风患者进行了研究。所有患者均接受了临床评估:(痉挛评估:包括布伦斯特罗姆恢复阶段(BRS)和超声波测量)。结果正中神经(远端)和正中神经(近端)的超声波测量结果呈统计学意义上的正相关。瘫痪侧正中神经的运动传导速度(平均值±SD)(48.3±9.5)与非瘫痪侧正中神经的运动传导速度(平均值±SD)(54.4±8.3)相比明显延迟,P 值(0.020)表明存在统计学意义上的显著差异。正中神经的 F 波潜伏期在瘫痪侧(平均值±标准差)(32.2± 5.1)明显高于非瘫痪侧(平均值±标准差)(27.5± 3.9),P 值(0.011)表明存在统计学意义上的显著差异。结论我们得出结论,脑卒中周围神经病例似乎在瘫痪侧受到电生理影响。但根据美国的测量结果,他们并没有受到影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Role of Chromohysteroscopy in Evaluation of Endometrial Pathology as a Cause of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Preserving Approach in Management of Femur Giant Cell Tumor with Curettage and Bone Grafting in an Adult Patient: Case Report Effect of Adenotonsillectomy on Velopharyngeal Closure Patterns Association between Interleukin-21 Serum Level and IL-21 Genetic Polymorphism with the Cardiovascular Morbidity Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients Effects of Early Immunonutrition on Patients with Pelvic Malignancies Receiving Radiotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1