Nationwide analysis of the breast cancer guidelines adherence in Bulgaria

Dobromir Dimitrov , Iskra Daskalova , Ivelina Petrova , Meri Shoshkova , Tsanko Yotsov , Damyan Boychev , Tihomir Andreev , Nikolai Ramadanov , Martin Karamanliev
{"title":"Nationwide analysis of the breast cancer guidelines adherence in Bulgaria","authors":"Dobromir Dimitrov ,&nbsp;Iskra Daskalova ,&nbsp;Ivelina Petrova ,&nbsp;Meri Shoshkova ,&nbsp;Tsanko Yotsov ,&nbsp;Damyan Boychev ,&nbsp;Tihomir Andreev ,&nbsp;Nikolai Ramadanov ,&nbsp;Martin Karamanliev","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2024.100044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer have tremendously changed in the last decades improving the survival and quality of life of the patients. Adherence to clinical practice guidelines in oncology significantly improves patients’ recurrence-free and overall survival. Nowadays, no national registry/database for breast cancer patients is available. This study aims to perform a nationwide analysis of the breast cancer guidelines adherence in Bulgaria, in particular regarding the diagnostic methods for histological confirmation and the types of radical surgery performed using an artificial intelligence (AI) powered software.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We analyzed data from January 2019 to August 2023 nationwide using the platform with access to anonymized medical information from Bulgaria's leading territorial oncology hospitals. A total of 13,790 patients met the inclusion criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The gold standard diagnostic tool, CNB, was done in 5427 patients (39.35%), an intraoperative frozen section was performed as a method for confirmation of breast cancer in 6257 patients (45.37%) and the standard technique for lymph node evaluation, sentinel lymph node biopsy, was done in 357 patients (2.99%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In Bulgaria, there are still difficulties in achieving comparable rates of core-needle biopsy for the diagnosis of breast cancer and we have demonstrated unacceptably high rates of frozen section use for intraoperative diagnosis of breast cancer. Breast-conserving surgery is widely accepted and available, but still, the rates are lower than usual for developed countries. The rates of sentinel lymph node biopsy, however, are unreasonably low.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100044"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X24000126/pdfft?md5=515dd0a0605a48fa490612aebfb3e8a8&pid=1-s2.0-S2773160X24000126-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X24000126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer have tremendously changed in the last decades improving the survival and quality of life of the patients. Adherence to clinical practice guidelines in oncology significantly improves patients’ recurrence-free and overall survival. Nowadays, no national registry/database for breast cancer patients is available. This study aims to perform a nationwide analysis of the breast cancer guidelines adherence in Bulgaria, in particular regarding the diagnostic methods for histological confirmation and the types of radical surgery performed using an artificial intelligence (AI) powered software.

Materials and methods

We analyzed data from January 2019 to August 2023 nationwide using the platform with access to anonymized medical information from Bulgaria's leading territorial oncology hospitals. A total of 13,790 patients met the inclusion criteria.

Results

The gold standard diagnostic tool, CNB, was done in 5427 patients (39.35%), an intraoperative frozen section was performed as a method for confirmation of breast cancer in 6257 patients (45.37%) and the standard technique for lymph node evaluation, sentinel lymph node biopsy, was done in 357 patients (2.99%).

Conclusion

In Bulgaria, there are still difficulties in achieving comparable rates of core-needle biopsy for the diagnosis of breast cancer and we have demonstrated unacceptably high rates of frozen section use for intraoperative diagnosis of breast cancer. Breast-conserving surgery is widely accepted and available, but still, the rates are lower than usual for developed countries. The rates of sentinel lymph node biopsy, however, are unreasonably low.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对保加利亚乳腺癌指南遵守情况的全国性分析
导言在过去的几十年中,乳腺癌的诊断和治疗发生了巨大的变化,提高了患者的生存率和生活质量。遵守肿瘤学临床实践指南可显著提高患者的无复发率和总生存率。目前,还没有针对乳腺癌患者的全国性登记/数据库。本研究旨在对保加利亚乳腺癌指南的遵守情况进行全国范围的分析,特别是使用人工智能(AI)驱动的软件进行组织学确认的诊断方法和根治手术的类型。材料和方法我们使用保加利亚主要地区肿瘤医院的匿名医疗信息访问平台,分析了2019年1月至2023年8月的全国数据。共有 13790 名患者符合纳入标准。结果5427 名患者(39.35%)采用了金标准诊断工具 CNB,6257 名患者(45.37%)采用了术中冷冻切片作为乳腺癌的确认方法,357 名患者(2.99%)采用了淋巴结评估的标准技术--前哨淋巴结活检。结论在保加利亚,核心针活检用于乳腺癌诊断的比例仍难以达到可比水平,而且我们已经证明冷冻切片用于乳腺癌术中诊断的比例高得令人无法接受。保乳手术已被广泛接受和使用,但其比例仍低于发达国家的一般水平。然而,前哨淋巴结活检率低得不合理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Surgical frontiers in metastatic disease: Shaping cancer care Individualized surgical approach based on Bismuth-Corlette classification for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma Liquid biopsy for monitoring minimal residual disease in colorectal cancer: A promising approach with clinical implications Diagnostic sensitivity of immune-inflammatory cell proportion in early diagnosis of endometrial cancer Chinese expert consensus on the pelvic exenteration for primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes and locally recurrent rectal cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1