Unearthing care: Rooting alternative agricultural practices in Norway and Costa Rica

Isabelle Hugøy
{"title":"Unearthing care: Rooting alternative agricultural practices in Norway and Costa Rica","authors":"Isabelle Hugøy","doi":"10.1177/25148486241245012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article contributes to the growing literature on human-soil relations by exploring how care for agricultural soils unfolds among farmers who engage with alternative agricultural practices across different productions and sites in Norway and Costa Rica. These farmers approach soil as a living being and seek to approach care with macro- and microorganisms in response to soil challenges and economic instabilities. The article follows recent literature on soil care in showing how agricultural practices challenge the dominant approach to soils as passive. However, the article argues the necessity of expanding on existing notions of care. This, I argue, involves ethnographically “unearthing” care: unpacking and situating a diversity of soil care practices, their human and other-than-human entanglements, and how these relations are conditioned by environmental, genealogical, sociocultural, temporal, epistemic, economic, and political mechanisms within and beyond the farm. Considering these variables is essential to keep soil care in the emerging literature from following a romanticizing path toward abstract individualism.","PeriodicalId":507916,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space","volume":"945 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486241245012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article contributes to the growing literature on human-soil relations by exploring how care for agricultural soils unfolds among farmers who engage with alternative agricultural practices across different productions and sites in Norway and Costa Rica. These farmers approach soil as a living being and seek to approach care with macro- and microorganisms in response to soil challenges and economic instabilities. The article follows recent literature on soil care in showing how agricultural practices challenge the dominant approach to soils as passive. However, the article argues the necessity of expanding on existing notions of care. This, I argue, involves ethnographically “unearthing” care: unpacking and situating a diversity of soil care practices, their human and other-than-human entanglements, and how these relations are conditioned by environmental, genealogical, sociocultural, temporal, epistemic, economic, and political mechanisms within and beyond the farm. Considering these variables is essential to keep soil care in the emerging literature from following a romanticizing path toward abstract individualism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发掘关爱:在挪威和哥斯达黎加扎根的替代性农业实践
这篇文章探讨了挪威和哥斯达黎加从事替代农业生产的农民如何在不同的生产和地点开展对农业土壤的保护,从而为有关人类与土壤关系的文献做出了贡献。这些农民将土壤视为有生命的存在,并寻求用宏观和微生物来护理土壤,以应对土壤面临的挑战和经济不稳定性。文章沿用了近期有关土壤养护的文献,展示了农业实践如何挑战将土壤视为被动的主流方法。不过,文章认为有必要扩展现有的照料概念。我认为,这需要从人种学角度 "发掘 "照料:解读和定位土壤照料实践的多样性、它们与人类和非人类的纠葛,以及这些关系如何受到农场内外的环境、家谱、社会文化、时间、认识论、经济和政治机制的制约。要使新兴文献中的土壤护理不走向抽象个人主义的浪漫主义道路,考虑这些变量至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reindeer, rockets and space infrastructures: Enacting oligoptic-satellitarian environments in Northern Sweden Uncertainty talk for bio-digital technologies: Expert conceptions of uncertainties in genomic selection for forestry Accessible nature: Balancing contradiction in protected areas Ecology of grief: Climatic events and disasters in the Himalaya Against the promethean: Energy throughput and the far-right politics of degrowth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1